Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00765
Original file (BC-2012-00765.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-00765 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED: NO 

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 
 
IN THE MATTER OF: 
 
   
 
   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His fitness assessment (FA) score recorded on 12 October 2011 be 
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He  had  a  known  injury  documented  by  a  flight  surgeon  on  a 
Memorandum for Fitness Assessment Cell, dated 27 September 2011, 
and  a  medical  evaluation  recommending  postponing  the  fitness 
assessment  through  13  October  2011.    Due  to  operational 
necessity  he  was  forced  to  take  the  fitness  assessment  on 
12 October  2011  to  comply  with  simulated  Operational  Readiness 
Inspection  (ORI)  deployability  requirements  inside  of  the 
recommended  medical  postponement  period.    Unfortunately,  the 
injury  reoccurred  during  the  run  portion  of  the  assessment 
causing an unsatisfactory component score by 7 seconds.   
 
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
AFFMS  Individual  Test  History  and  a  Memorandum  for  Fitness 
Assessment Cell letter dated 27 September 2011.   
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  is  currently  serving  in  the  Regular  Air  Force  in 
the grade of Major, O-4.   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
HQ  AFPC/DPSIM  recommends  denial.    DPSIM  states  the  flight 
surgeon’s  recommended  postponement  period  was  for  7  to  10  days 
from  3  October  2011,  meaning  the  applicant  could  have  tested 
anywhere from 10 October to 13 October 2011, in which he tested 
on  12  October  2011.    They  recommend  denial  of  his  request  to 

have the fitness assessment dated 12 October 2011, removed from 
AFFMS.   
 
The  complete  AFPC/DPSIM  evaluation,  with  attachment,  is  at 
Exhibit B. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A copy of the Air Force evaluation (Exhibit C) was forwarded to 
the applicant on 12 April 2012, for review and comment within 30 
days.  To date, this office has not received a response.   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed.   
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.    After  a 
thorough  review  of  the  evidence  of  record  and  the  applicant's 
submission,  we  see  no  evidence  of  error  or  impropriety  in  the 
physical  fitness  test  and  subsequent  fitness  assessment  score. 
Therefore,  we  agree  with  the  opinion  and  recommendation  of  the 
Air  Force  office  of  primary  responsibility  and  adopt  its 
rationale  as  the  basis  for  our  decision  that  the  applicant  has 
failed to sustain his burden of having suffered either an error 
or  injustice.    Therefore,  in  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the 
contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief 
sought in this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 

 

2 

 
 
 
 
 
     
     
 

The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  this  application 
BC-2012-00765 in Executive Session on 2 October 2012, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
  
 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 17 February 2012, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 21 March 2012, 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 April 2012. 
 
 
 
 
                                    
                                   Panel Chair 

Panel Chair 
Member 
Member 

w/atchs. 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00749

    Original file (BC-2012-00749.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By letter dated 19 March 2012, HQ AFPC/DPSIM requested the applicant provide additional supporting documentation to substantiate his claim; specifically, a signed memorandum from the Fit Cell staff documenting that his pushups were counted incorrectly. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provided an expanded statement of the events of 6 December 2011 and provided supporting documents. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01084

    Original file (BC-2012-01084.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her request, the applicant provides a letter from the flight surgeon, a Report of Individual Fitness, AF Forms 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status and AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report. The applicant’s overall composite score will reflect 80.25 (Satisfactory) The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. We believe the documentation provided by the applicant provides a reasonable basis to conclude the applicant should...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04175

    Original file (BC-2011-04175.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends the sit-up portion of the fitness assessment dated 6 October 2011 be updated to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS), since he sought immediate medical attention following the test and his existing...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02387

    Original file (BC-2012-02387.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-02387 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _____________________ _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 5 October 2011, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01534

    Original file (BC-2012-01534.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends updating the push-up component of the applicant’s fitness assessment to reflect “exempt” in AFFMS; which would change her overall composite score to 88.33 (Satisfactory). The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSID recommends approval of the applicant’s request to remove her contested EPR. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04234

    Original file (BC-2012-04234.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIM states that on 25 September 2012, a memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional documentation - specifically, a memo from the 382nd TRS superintendent stating that she was administered a fitness assessment by a non-PTL, non-prior service, technical student and a copy of her signed fitness assessment score sheet dated 5 June 2012. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04898

    Original file (BC 2013 04898.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 5 May 2014, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) considered and denied the applicant’s request to remove the FA dated 14 February 2012 from the AFFMS. The board stated while they had determined there was clear evidence the applicant was miscounseled on what the score was to pass the fitness assessment, the FAAB had determined that it is the applicant’s responsibility to understand what the standards are for his age requirement. After a thorough review of the evidence of record...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05054

    Original file (BC-2011-05054.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on applicant’s senior airman date of rank (DOR) of 5 April 2011, the first time he would be eligible for promotion consideration to staff sergeant is cycle 12E5. The DPSOE complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 27 April 2012, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02364

    Original file (BC-2012-02364.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: DATE 10 Feb 10 31 Aug 10 * 14 Sep 11 27 Oct 11 2 Feb 12 *Contested FA score. _________________________________________________________________ , Panel Chair , Member , Member THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the cardio and sit-up components of the Fitness Assessment dated 14 Sep 11 be amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05600

    Original file (BC 2012 05600.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05600 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 14 October 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 16 October 2012, the applicant’s commander indicated he was aware that the applicant did not complete the FA and...