AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00786
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be allowed to apply to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits
to his dependents with an effective date of June 2009 to avoid
incurring an additional active duty service commitment (ADSC)
beyond 24 June 2013.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
In 2009, he registered for Post 9/11 GI Bill education benefits
with the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) and was led to
believe that his Defense Enrollment Eligibility System (DEERS)
dependents would be automatically eligible to receive the
education benefits. He discovered in November 2011 that his
dependents were not enrolled and in order to transfer education
benefits to his dependents he would incur a four year ADSC with
an effective date as of the time of enrollment.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of an
extract of the TEB Discussion Thread and his DVA Certificate of
Eligibility.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of
Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) (O-5).
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the
Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial noting the applicant did not provide
adequate justification or documentation showing an error or
injustice occurred. If the applicant had accessed the Department
of Veterans Affairs (DVA) website on how to switch from the
Montgomery GI Bill to Post 9/11, he would have been able to
select the option to transfer benefits to dependents via the
Official DoD TEB website link which would have led him to the
website link to Transfer of Education Benefits. TFSC RNT records
reflect the applicant did not inquire about the status of his TEB
until 3 November 2011, two years after his initial application
date.
Under Title 38 United States Code (USC), Chapter 33, service
members are allowed to transfer unused educational benefits to
their dependent spouses and children. Any member of the Armed
Forces, active duty or Selected Reserves, officer, or enlisted,
on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI
bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on
the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional
period of duty in the Armed Forces from the date of election, may
transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. The Air
Force, in implementing its guidance, developed a communication
plan that used the Air Force Personnel Center Commander and the
Education and Training Sections at each installation to serve as
spokespersons to communicate the Post-9/11 GI Bill transfer-to-
dependent program using internal media, internal communication
tools, and external trade publications. There were various news
articles about the Post-9/11 GI Bill; most noted the requirement
to be on duty on the 1 August 2009 effective date of the Post-
9/11 GI Bill to be eligible to transfer benefits. Some articles
mentioned that service members on active duty or in the selected
reserve could transfer benefits. Notably, since 1 August 2009,
the Air Force approved over 50,000 transferability applications.
The Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), the DoD and the
Military Services widely publicized the Post-9/11 GI Bill and the
transferability feature. DoD developed a special website, hosted
by Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC), to facilitate the
transfer of educational benefits. The website system was
operational on 27 June 2009 for the purpose of accepting transfer
of benefits applications. The Directive Type Memo (DTM) and Air
Force Instruction state the transfer must be made while the
member is serving in the Armed Forces. Both documents were
published on government-hosted websites prior to 1 August 2009,
the effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.
The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation, with attachments, is at
Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
2
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 1 May 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we did not find his assertions
sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided by Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as
the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the
victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-00786 in Executive Session on 13 September 2012,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
3
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-00786 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Nov 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Military Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 22 Mar 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 May 12.
Panel Chair
4
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02587
Had the applicant gone onto the Air Force website to transfer benefits he would have been approved and would have found out about the ADSC he would have incurred as a result of the transfer of education benefits. If the advertising of the GI Bill was as robust as suggested by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, then he or at least one of the five counselors mentioned above would have known the process of how to transfer GI Bill benefits to his dependents. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04298
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04928 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits (TEB) to his dependents on 17 Aug 11. He should be granted the 17 Aug 11 TEB transfer date because he met the requirements by signing the AF Form 4406, Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits Statement of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05210
He completed the required application to transfer his Post- 9/11 GI Bill TEB to his dependent. On multiple occasions in the months of January through March, his network administrators worked on his computer multiple times a week sometimes even several times a day. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 22 February 2010, he...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01366
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, stating, in part, the application is not supported with evidence that the applicant was a victim of an error or injustice. After a 2 thorough review of the evidence of record, we do not find persuasive evidence that his Post 911 GI Bill Transfer of educational benefits date is in error. While the applicant believes he was not properly briefed on the requirements to transfer...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01703
He would have transferred his MGIB benefits to the Post-9/11 Bill if he would have known that MGIB transferability to dependents went away and/or that his ADSC would have been waived if he transferred to the Post-9/11 GI Bill. He was not provided the proper information pertaining to the GI Bill benefits or transferring his education benefits to the Post-9/11 GI Bill. While the applicant contends he was unaware that he could not transfer the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) (Chapter 30) to his...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00338
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00338 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to apply to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents with an effective date of January 2010 to avoid incurring an additional active duty service commitment (ADSC). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00409
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve (SelRes), officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election. If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05696
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05696 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. DPSIT states that the applicant retired effective 31 Jul 2009. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01521
He was not informed by the DVA or the Air Force of the need to transfer the benefits. Had the applicant gone onto the Air Forces website to transfer benefits - he would have been approved and would have found out about the ADSC he would have incurred as a result of the transfer of benefits. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 May 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01541
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating the applicant did not provide adequate justification or documentation to substantiate approval of his request. Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, eligible for...