AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04933
AFBCMR BC-2012-04933 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04938
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-JBJE/CL recommends denial, indicating the applicant did not submit his request in a timely manner and, in accordance with the law, they cannot terminate his SBP at this time. While the applicant contends a series of unfortunate significant personal struggles caused him to forget to submit a request to terminate his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage, we do not find the documentation presented...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04941
The complete DPFD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: His back pain was not a pre-existing condition. He also contends that he was not offered legal representation; however, according to the applicants Request for Discharge for Physical Disability letter, dated 15 Sep 1959, he certified that his request for discharge was fully explained to him and that he understood that he could...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04943
The parties divorced on 5 Jun 98, and in the Child Custody Marital Dissolution Agreement, incorporated in the divorce decree, the member agreed the applicant would receive survivor benefits from his military retirement. There is no evidence of Air Force error, and absent a competing claimant, we recommend the member's record be corrected to reflect that he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay and named the applicant as the eligible former spouse...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04944
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04944 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect award of the appropriate medals and boots on the ground for his service in Honduras and in support of Operation ELDORADO CANYON in Sicily. He was credited with four years of active duty service, including...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04946
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14 Dec 12, for review and comment within 30 days. After a thorough review of the applicants complete submission and the evidence of record we found it insufficient to conclude that he was permanently assigned to Vietnam. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04947
AFBCMR BC-2012-04947 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04949
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04949 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits (TEB) to his dependent son while he was on active duty. When he out-processed through the Educational Office at Bolling AFB, DC, no mention was made of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04950
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04950 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessments dated 29 Jun 12 and 27 Sep 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04952
AFBCMR BC-2012-04952 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04956
On 26 Aug 69, SAF authorized the AFOEA to recognize the achievements and accomplishments of USAF organizations or activities. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the AFOEA, indicating they were unable to verify the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04957
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04957 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 2656, Data for Payment of Retired Personnel, be corrected to reflect he declined the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and his spouse concurred. DPFFF states that the applicant completed an election to decline SBP coverage; however, his wifes...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04962
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating the applicant was approved for retirement on 19 May 09, nearly three full months prior to the start of the program on 1 Aug 09. The applicant has not provided any evidence that he was never briefed of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04963
He believes this to be in error because he measured his abdominals the morning of the FA and measured at a 37.5. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 25 April 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04967
It should be noted that the applicant was diagnosed in Dec 11 with her medical condition and was administered the FA in Mar 12, which she successfully completed the push-up component. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice with regard to the applicants request to remove her 12 Sep 12 FA test from the AFFMS. We note the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility; however, after reviewing the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04968
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04968 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect award of the Silver Star and Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). Based on their review of the applicant's official military personnel...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04971
In response to the request, the applicant states that he is almost 81 years old and his friends and relatives are not aware of his undesirable discharge. His complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. At the time of the applicants discharge, AFR 39-17, paragraph 8, stated that when discharged because of unfitness, an Undesirable Discharge (UD) will be furnished. However, in 1959, AFR 39-17 was changed to state that an airman discharged under this regulation should be furnished...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04975
DPSOE states that it is not clear which record the applicant wants corrected as the MilPDS reflects the following grade history: Grade DOR Effective Date AB 13 Apr 04 13 Apr 04 A1C 28 May 04 26 Aug 04 SrA 28 Sep 06 28 Sep 06 A1C 3 Dec 07 3 Dec 07 SrA 1 Apr 08 1 Apr 08 AB 7 Nov 08 7 Nov 08 DPSOE states that no further corrections are required as MilPDS reflects the applicant held the grade of senior airman. The second part, in the amount of $2,235.66 is due to overpayment of military pay...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04980
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04980 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) for Tranfer of her Post-9/11 Educational Benefits (TEB) be corrected to reflect 26 Jan 14, instead of 25 Sep 15. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04981
Since being retired, he found out that the SERB board appears to have selected officers for early retirement based on length of service rather than the required qualitative records review. He also provides a Chi-Squared test results to compare the differences in the selection rate for the various groups and concluded that age/length of service were in correlation with selection for early retirement. The applicant asserts that the SERB used age/length of service as a factor when selecting...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04984
DPSID states, the applicant contends that his OPR with an inclusive period of 29 Apr 11 through 17 Aug 11 was unjustly rendered due to various violations, by his rating chain, of the referral process in accordance with (lAW) AFI 36-2406 guidance. Regarding the applicants allegation that his rater failed to accrue the minimum number of days (60) to render the referral OPR, they have reviewed the OPR in question and have noted that the rater recorded 62 days of supervision on the OPR. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04991
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04991 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reason for separation (Fraudulent Entry in Military Service Board Waiver) along with the corresponding separation code of HDA be changed. On 21 Sep 12, the applicant submitted a conditional waiver of an administrative discharge board...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04992
On 9 May 2012, the applicant submitted an additional response to his denial of reenlistment and demotion action because he indicated that he just received the ROI. On 19 September 2012, by authority of the Secretary of the Air Force, his 3 August 2012 request for redress filed under Article 138 was denied as the actions taken by the command were determined to be appropriate to the circumstances. The applicants discharge was correctly administered on the basis of his RE code of 2X (denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04995
The AFEM is awarded to members of the armed forces of the United States who after 1 Jul 58 participate, or have participated as members of the U.S. military units in a military operation in which Service members of any Military Department participate, in the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, in significant numbers. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04997
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 18 Jul 11, the applicant was disenrolled from the AFROTC program under the provisions of AFI 36-2011, Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps Program, para 6.1.5, and AFROTCI 36-2011, Cadet Operations, para 11.4.2.3, for failure to maintain military retention standards. There were many more such counseling statements on file therefore the statement that an accident was the reason for not passing...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05001
This guidance supersedes guidelines established in AFI 36-2905 (dated 1 Jul 10), paragraph A8.2.14. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating the FA was conducted IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 2.1, which was applicable at the time of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05012
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05012 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) benefits to his dependents. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had planned on retiring in April 2009;...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05019
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05019 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Air Force (AF) Form 707, Officer Performance Report (OPR), rendered for the period 19 May 08 through 18 May 09, be declared void and removed from his records. Furthermore, the applicant has provided no evidence to show that the referral comment on...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05021
There is no evidence either party submitted an election to change spouse coverage to former spouse coverage within the first year following their divorce. SBP premiums for spouse coverage continued to be deducted from the members retired pay, and the former spouses name and date of birth remained as the applicants eligible spouse beneficiary until DFAS-CL received his 19 Mar 12 request to change spouse coverage to former spouse SBP coverage. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05023
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05023 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an Honorable discharge. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we do not find the documentation presented sufficient...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05024
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating the applicant clearly elected to participate in RCSBP. We took notice of the applicants complete submission, including his rebuttal response, in judging the merits of the case;...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05025
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05025 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation Convenience of the Government Failure to satisfactorily participate in training of the unit be changed. A letter from the Director of Base Medical Services, dated 27 January 1976 indicates that it was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05028
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05028 COUNSEL: NONE (DECEASED SERVICE MEMBER) HEARING DESIRED: NO (APPLICANT) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her spouses records be corrected to reflect she submitted a timely request for her Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05036
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05039
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A thorough review of the applicants official military personnel records revealed that he qualified for award of two BSSs to his...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05040
Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least six years of service on the date of election may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, the applicant retired from active duty prior to the Tranfer of Benefits becoming effective on 1 Aug 09 and, other than argument and conjecture, he has presented no evidence to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05045
On 21 Aug 95, the applicant was informed of the findings and recommendations of the board and did not provide a letter of exception or rebuttal. The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANTS REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Nov 12 and 14 Jan 13, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibits D). Therefore, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05047
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05047 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 12 Oct 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The fitness monitor incorrectly counted...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05048
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05048 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05054
DPTT states based on the information provided, the applicant did not elect to add his dependent son within the one-year time period as prescribed by U.S.C. The applicant acquired a dependent son on 6 July 2000 and their office was not notified of the birth of his son within one year as required by law. The applicant requested to change his RCSBP coverage within one year of the divorce as required by law Title 10, USC, Section 1448.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05056
On 14 Jun 85, the applicant was discharged from active duty with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge, with a Narrative Reason for Separation of MisconductPattern Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline, an RE code of 2B, and was credited with 1 year, 2 months, and 11 days of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05059
She had a break in service from 4 Nov 10 until 14 Jan 11, at which time she reenlisted in the Reserve. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Therefore, the applicants correct...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05065
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C and F. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice with respect to the applicants discharge. While the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) saw fit to award the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05069
Specifically, § 1552(f)(1) permits the correction of a record to reflect actions taken by a reviewing authority under the UCMJ. We find no evidence which indicates the applicants service characterization, which had its basis in his court-martial conviction and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that it exceeded the limitations set forth in the UCMJ. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05072
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05072 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions (UHC)) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 19 Jun 13, a request for information pertaining to his post- service activities was forwarded to the applicant for response within 15 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05073
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was not provided any information on transferring educational benefits to her dependents. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05077
Based upon the presumed sufficiency of the referral OPR as served, and insufficient evidence to support the allegations made by the applicant, they find that the referral comment mentioned in the applicant's contested report was appropriate, and as such there is no basis in which to support removal of the contested evaluation. After reviewing all of the evidence provided, we are not persuaded the applicants referral OPR should be expunged and her record be given Special Selection Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05084
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05084 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His active duty service commitment (ADSC) incurred for participation in the Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Beta Test Program (UBTP) be changed from six years to three years. In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a 66-paragragh personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05096
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05096 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 31 Aug 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 30 Nov 12 88.00 Satisfactory* 31 Aug...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05098
The applicant appealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his general discharge, narrative reason for separation, and reentry code upgraded. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFP/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is insufficient evidence in the applicants military record pertaining to his discharge. We note the applicant's discharge records are not available for our review.