RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04891
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her fitness assessment (FA) recorded on 4 October 2012 be
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her fitness assessment score sheet has an incorrect run time of
16 minutes and 23 seconds. This needs to be corrected to a run
time of 16 minutes and 19 seconds. That was the stated run time
called out as she crossed the finish line on her final lap.
In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of AF
Form 1168, Statement of Suspect/Witness/Complaint, from herself
and two other witnesses, her fitness assessment score sheet and
AFFMS Individual Test History.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of Senior Airman (SrA), E-4.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states the applicant
provided a copy of her FA score sheet and witness statements
from other members who tested on the same day. In accordance
with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Assessment, Air Force Guidance
Memorandum (AFGM) 4, Attachment 1, paragraph 5, states Fitness
Assessment Cell (FAC) staff will supervise Airmen conducting
push-ups, sit-ups, and the 1.5 mile run/1-0-mile walk at a ratio
of no more than 12 members for every one FAC staff member or
Physical Training Leader (PTL). Additionally, the applicant
provided no additional documentation to further support her
request.
The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at
Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 11 January 2013 for review and comment within 30
days (Exhibit D). To date, a response has not been received.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After a
thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's
submission, we see no evidence of error or impropriety in the
administration of the contested FA and subsequent score. The
documentation submitted by the applicant in support of her
request is duly noted; however, we find she has not provided
substantial evidence to support her contention that her run-time
for the cardio component of the contested FA was entered
incorrectly. Therefore, in the absence of such evidence, we
find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 13 August 2013, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2012-04891:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dtd 17 Oct 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 14 Dec 2012, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jan 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02511
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of the FACs lap count sheets from his 16 Feb 12 FA and his retest on 13 Mar 12. The applicants last five FA results: Date Composite Score Rating 13 Mar 12 85.70 Satisfactory 16 Feb 12 72.20 Unsatisfactory 12 Jul 11 83.10 Satisfactory 23 May 11 75.80 Unsatisfactory 16 Nov 10 77.80 Satisfactory The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02277
On 24 Apr 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained a composite score of 64.40 unsatisfactory due to failure to achieve minimum requirements on the AC. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant submitted; a memorandum from the FAC validating that she in fact asked for a re-tape by another...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03846
The airman indicates the applicant completed the run portion of the FA ahead of his 12:59 run time. He again entered the track to provide support to the airman in completing the run by running with the airman and when they crossed the finish line the Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC) personnel incorrectly recorded his time as 13:34. In this respect, we note the applicant has provided a supporting statement from a fellow participant indicating the time recorded for the applicant must be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02621
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02621 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 23 May 13 be corrected to reflect a 1.5 mile run time of 14:00 minutes in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The other participant had a recorded time of 13:57, yet he was given a time of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02006
His providers memorandum for record (MFR) stated he had a medical condition that prevented him from attaining a passing score on the walking component of his FA; however, the test was not removed from his records. Upon expiration of your 42 days reconditioning, you are cleared to test in all components of the AF Fitness Test. On 29 May 12, a memorandum was sent to applicant requesting additional documentation for removal of his FA dated 29 Oct 10. While he contends that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02387
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-02387 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _____________________ _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 5 October 2011, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02331
On 2 Jan 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 Feb 14, applicant provided a memorandum in rebuttal of AFPC/DPSIM and FAAB memoranda. While we note an...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03908
On 29 Nov 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA and failed to attain the minimum score in the cardio component. On 14 Feb 14, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) disapproved the applicants request for relief on the basis that the applicant should not have completed the contested FAs once she became injured; additionally, the applicant did not provide a commanders invalidation memorandum invalidating contested FAs. For Regular Air Force and AGR, they will enter the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02179
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She received an unsatisfactory score due to Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC) misinterpreted the Italian handwriting of the FAC when recording the number of push-ups performed. The applicant did not provide an official statement from the FAC stating there was an error. On 6 Nov 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04682
The applicants last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 30 Oct 13 82.75 Exempt Satisfactory 28 Aug 13 32.60 32/0.00(1-mile walk) Unsatisfactory *13 Aug 13 71.75 Exempt Unsatisfactory 13 Feb 13 87.00 Exempt Satisfactory 7 Aug 12 80.20 15:52/44.10 Satisfactory * Contested FA A similar request was denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) on 14 Feb 14 on the basis of no letter from the commander to invalidate the Fitness Assessment. Also, no AF Form...