RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04867
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He receive joint duty credit from 23 May 06 through 2 Nov 06.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His joint duty assignment is not recorded on his records. From
23 May 06 through 2 Nov 06, he served in a joint duty position
in Combined Forces Command-A, which the Secretary of Defense
approved as being eligible for joint duty credit.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________ ______________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant initially entered the Air Force on 5 Jul 00.
On 31 Mar 08, the applicant was honorably discharged from active
duty for completion of his required active service, and credited
with 7 years, 8 months, and 26 days active service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPAPPO recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of
an error or an injustice. On 1 Oct 07, the law changed to allow
officers to apply for joint duty credit for any joint
experiences they may have previously had, retroactive to
11 Sep 01. The applicant was on active duty at the time, but
neglected to apply. In Mar 08, the applicant separated from
active duty. On 1 Oct 10, the policy changed so officers had to
apply for joint credit within one year of the completion of
their experience. In Feb 12, the applicant returned to active
duty, and requested credit for his joint duty experience from
2006, which is now over six years old. There are no waivers
allowed to this Joint Staff policy.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPPO evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 11 Jan 13 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-04867 in Executive Session on 9 Jul 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Oct 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPPO, dated 10 Dec 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jan 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01296
If the Air Force was to meet the required promotion rate for JSOs, IAW Public Law 99-433, para 662.a.2, an additional 19 JSOs would need to be promoted from the CY11B Col CSB. average average 2 above board (board The complete DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: By letter dated 30 Jul 12, the applicant states there are two critical areas in which the two advisory opinions did...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01699
The applicant was awarded credit for JPME II (for attending Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)) in Nov 05; however, JPME II is not reflected on OSBs. The applicant completed JPME II on 18 Nov 05, but did not receive full joint tour credit until 1 Sep 09. AFPC/DPSID notified the applicant that his attendance at JPME II is documented in his training report (TR) rendered for the period 12 Sep 05 to 18 Nov 05, and they verified that the report was filed in his officer selection...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00611
She was not recommended for a permanent change of station (PCS) decoration for her service between March 2006 and June 2008, because she did not have a current PT on file, even though the squadron commander had waived the requirement. 2 AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of a decoration for her service between March 2006 and June 2008. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSOO recommends denial of the applicant’s request for...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01357
His personnel records be changed to reflect credit for a deployment rather than being cited for his PCS assignment to Al Udeid Air Base from Jun 06 – Jun 07, and his record be considered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 2007B (CY07B) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB). In addition, he notes that an article from the Air Force Times indicates that Air Force policy has changed to mask deployment histories in the OSB. B. TAYLOR, JR. Chief Examiner Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04080
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-04080 INDEX CODE: 131.01 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for the Calendar Year 2008A (CY08A) (P0608A) Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB), with inclusion of a new letter to the promotion board. The letter was...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03901
In a letter dated 18 Jan 06 (Exhibit C), HQ AFPC/DPAMF2 requested the applicant explain why she felt she should have been awarded the grade of captain when she entered active duty. The time between her commissioning as a lLT in the Air Force Reserve on 2 Nov 78 and when she entered active duty on 10 Jan 79 is not active service nor creditable as active service for retirement. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 22 Jan 06, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02605
Applicant’s records were administratively corrected to reflect the following awards on his DD Form 214, dated: 1) Awarded the BSM, Special Order G-3337, dated 17 Aug 04. Therefore, they were not authorized to be on the officer selection brief (OSB) and he was not entitled to a Special Selection Board. The applicant previously requested a correction of his records and was granted an SSB in Apr 01.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01441
Upon reentering the military in the BSC, she was initially awarded two full years of credit without specifying which dates were the dates for which she received the educational credit. Per USC Title 10, “A period of time shall be counted only once when computing constructive service credit.” To prevent awarding service credit for the same period of time for her commissioned military service time and time spent earning her MPH degree, DPAFM2 must subtract her two years of educational credit...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2005-02374
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02374 INDEX CODE: 112.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: By amendment, he be awarded additional constructive service credit (CSC) for his master’s degree in biochemical engineering and for his professional experience in the Canadian Forces. Applicant’s complete response, with...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | bc-2009-01709
On 4 Feb 08, the applicant’s rater requested input from the previous rater for the EPR closing 28 Jan 08. On 13 Feb 08, the applicant appealed the EPR to the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) contending the EPR indicated incorrect dates of supervision. A complete copy of the DPSIDEP evaluation is at Exhibit C.