Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04774
Original file (BC-2012-04774.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-04774
			
			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His fitness assessment (FA), dated 10 July 2012, be removed from 
the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He broke his back during the sit-up portion of his 10 July 2012 
FA.  This rendered him incapable of a fair assessment.  There 
was an X-ray taken on the day of his FA proving he sustained a 
debilitating injury.  The injury, however, could not be 
confirmed until 10 days later when he was administered an MRI.  
He has since undergone treatment for this injury.

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides AF Form 422, 
Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, AF Form 
469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, E-mail correspondence and 
his Air Force Fitness Management System print out.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of technical sergeant.  On 10 July 2012, the applicant 
achieved a composite score of 77.40 on his FA.  He did not 
attain the minimum amount of sit-up for this gender/age group; 
therefore, his fitness level was listed as “unsatisfactory.”

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends approval of removing the cardio, push-up 
and sit-up components of the FA dated 10 July 2012.  The 
applicant provided an AF Form 422 stating that he was cleared 
for the abdominal measurement only.  

The cardio, push-up and sit-up components of the assessment 
should be updated to reflect “exempt.”   The applicant’s overall 
composite score would then reflect 100.00 - excellent. 

The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 30 October 2012, for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit C).  As of this date, this office has received 
no response.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We find 
insufficient evidence to warrant removal of the contested FA in 
its entirety.  Therefore, we find no basis upon which to 
recommend favorable consideration of his request to remove the 
contested FA from the AFFMS. 

4.  Notwithstanding the above determination, we believe some 
relief is warranted.  We took note of the recommendation of the 
Air Force office of primary responsibility to “exempt” the 
applicant from the sit-up, push-up and cardio components of the 
contested FA and agree the record should be corrected 
accordingly.  The applicant has provided substantial evidence 
that he was seriously injured during the contested FA.  
Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected 
only to the extent indicated below.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the sit-
up, push-up and cardio components of the Fitness Assessment 
dated 10 July 2010, be amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air 
Force Fitness Management System. 

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04774 in Executive Session on 6 June 2013 under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

				Panel Chair
				Member
				Member

All members voted to correct the record, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 4 Oct 12, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 18 Oct 12, w/atch.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Oct 12.




                                                                  
Panel Chair







Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05779

    Original file (BC-2012-05779.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A resume of the applicant's FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Rating *28 Nov 12 38.40 Unsatisfactory 31 May 12 85.90 Satisfactory 13 May 11 93.90 Excellent 23 Nov 10 80.10 Good 5 May 10 79.25 Good 2 Nov 09 85.00 Good * Contested FA The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. They...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01591

    Original file (BC 2013 01591.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 29 Nov 2011, a medical evaluation letter was signed by the same provider who issued the previous AF Form 469s. The letter states, “There are medical conditions that preclude this member from achieving a passing score on the Air Force fitness assessment.” On 1 Dec 2011, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was initiated from his Medical Provider, which could exempt the applicant from the cardio and push-up components of the FA. On 27 Mar 2012, a medical evaluation letter was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00377

    Original file (BC-2013-00377.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the applicant's DD Form 149, he also indicated he had ankle pain when completing the sit-up component of the 31 August 2012 FA. Unfortunately, neither profile exempts him from the sit-up component. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05279

    Original file (BC 2013 05279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 Oct 13 she received an updated AF Form 469, stating that she was exempt from the cardio component of the FA. The applicant's AF Form 469 shows the cardio limitations expired on 23 Sep 13, which would have allowed the applicant to complete the cardio component of the FA. The applicant did not provide an updated AF Form 469 to show the exemption expired on a later date.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02364

    Original file (BC-2012-02364.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: DATE 10 Feb 10 31 Aug 10 * 14 Sep 11 27 Oct 11 2 Feb 12 *Contested FA score. _________________________________________________________________ , Panel Chair , Member , Member THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the cardio and sit-up components of the Fitness Assessment dated 14 Sep 11 be amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04151

    Original file (BC-2012-04151.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04151 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA), dated 2 August 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not medically fit to complete the walk,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02813

    Original file (BC-2012-02813.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the cardio, sit-up, and push-up components of her FA dated 2 Apr 2012 reflect “exempt” in the AFFMS. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Oct 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04468

    Original file (BC 2013 04468.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Finally, the applicant did not provide any additional supporting documentation to consider, i.e., commander’s invalidation, AF Form 422, etc.” AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to void and remove the FAs dated 22 Feb 11, 1 Mar 11, and 22 Jun 11. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM and AFPC/DPSIDE evaluations is at Exhibit B and Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00822

    Original file (BC 2013 00822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 30 Jul 13 85.40 Satisfactory 1 Feb 13 75.33 Satisfactory *19 Dec 12 32.50 Unsatisfactory 7 Jun 12 83.50 Satisfactory 29 Feb 12 38.10 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04690

    Original file (BC-2012-04690.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 March 2011, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, which exempted him from the 1.5 mile run and sit-up components of the FA, until 10 May 2011. On 17 May 2011, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, which exempted him from the 1.5 mile run and sit-up components of the FA, until 10 June 2011. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...