RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04760
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His narrative reason for separation be changed.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was injured while on active duty. He is a 20 percent
disabled veteran.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 17 Sep 85, the applicant commenced his enlistment in the
Regular Air Force.
On 10 Jan 86, the applicants commander notified him that he was
recommending his discharge from the Air Force for drug abuse.
The specific reason for the action was the applicant wrongfully
used marijuana as evidenced by his positive drug test result.
On 10 Jan 86, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the action,
his right to consult with legal counsel, and submit statements
in his own behalf and, on 13 Jan 86, he waived his right to
submit statements.
On 21 Jan 86, the case was found legally sufficient and, on
17 Jan 86, the discharge authority directed the applicant be
furnished a general (under honorable conditions) discharge.
On 5 Feb 86, the applicant was furnished a general (under
honorable conditions) discharge with a narrative reason for
separation of Misconduct Drug Abuse. He was credited with
4 months and 19 days of total active service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of
primary which is attached at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicants request to
change his narrative reason for discharge, indicating there is
no evidence of an error or injustice. Based on the
documentation on file in the master personnel records, the
discharge to include the service characterization was
appropriately administered and within the discretion of the
discharge authority. The applicant did not provide any evidence
that an error or injustice occurred in the processing of his
discharge and has provided no facts warranting a change to his
narrative reason for separation.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 14 Dec 12 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit E).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-04760 in Executive Session on 4 Jun 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Oct 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 10 Dec 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Dec 12.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02890
On 10 Jan 86, the case was found to be legally sufficient and, on 17 Jan 86, the discharge authority directed the applicant be furnihed a general discharge. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05111
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05111 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Narrative Reason for Separation on her DD 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, of Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service/Drug Abuse be removed. On 22 Nov 10, the applicant was furnished an ELS with uncharacterized service...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05751
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05751 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 3A (1st term airman separating before 36 months) and narrative reason for discharge of childbirth on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to hardship due to dependency. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05751
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05751 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 3A (1st term airman separating before 36 months) and narrative reason for discharge of childbirth on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to hardship due to dependency. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05647
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice regarding the applicants discharge. Based upon the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05647
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice regarding the applicants discharge. Based upon the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03965
On 17 Jul 1995, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was not recommending him for reenlistment in the Air Force. DPSOR states that the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include his separation code was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03965
On 17 Jul 1995, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was not recommending him for reenlistment in the Air Force. DPSOR states that the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include his separation code was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04397
On 18 Apr 11, the legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient and recommended discharge with an honorable discharge. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial noting the applicant has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice regarding his RE code. Based on the evidence of record, it appears the applicants honorable discharge for unsatisfactory performance was consistent with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04487
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the service characterization was appropriately administered...