RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04770
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His 9 Sep 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Prior to the 9 Sep 12 FA, he received a valid waiver from his
physical training leader (PTL) exempting him from the walking
portion of his FA; however, the person who administered the FA
recorded the cardio portion of the FA as incomplete, causing
him to fail. This may have been done on purpose due to a
personality conflict he had with the FA administrator. The
unsatisfactory FA score caused his reenlistment and promotion to
be stopped.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served in the Air Force Reserve in the grade of
technical sergeant (E-6) during the matter under review.
The applicants last five FA results are as follows:
Date
Composite Score
Rating
9 Sep 12
37.50
Unsatisfactory
10 Sep 11
96.20
Excellent
12 Mar 11
87.80
Satisfactory
18 Sep 10
89.50
Satisfactory
13 Mar 10
79.55
Good
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility, which is included at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of
an error of injustice. In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Air
Force Guidance Memo 4, Fitness Program, the Unit Fitness Program
Manager (UFPM) retains the Fitness Screening Questionnaire (FSQ)
and/or the AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, and the
AF Form 422, Physical Profile Serial Report, in a folder until a
more current FSQ is signed or the AF Form 469 expires. The UFPM
notifies the Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC) of all exemptions.
The FAC enters exemptions into the AFFMS. The applicant did not
provide documented evidence that he received a waiver.
Therefore, this office cannot determine the existence of an
injustice. On 6 Nov 12, additional documentation was requested
from the applicant, but none was received.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment,
is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 17 Feb 13 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of AFPC/DPSIM and adopt its rationale as the
basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim
of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence
to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-04770 in Executive Session on 9 Jul 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Oct 12.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 2 Feb 13, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Feb 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01802
The applicants last eight FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 13 Nov 13 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU) 9 May 13 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU) *25 Mar 13 33.33 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from PU) *12 Dec 12 - Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14 28 Jun 12 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) *19 Mar 12 - Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14 2 Aug 11 84.70 Satisfactory 28 Apr 11 77.90 Unsatisfactory (minimum SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04414
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04414 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs), dated 12 Aug 08, 27 Apr 10, 29 Jul l0, 3 Nov l0, and 24 Apr 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 7 May 12 she was medically evaluated, at the request of her...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03968
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 29 Aug 13 95.75 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio) *30 May 13 37.00 Unsatisfactory (0 Points for Cardio) 29 Nov 12 76.30 Satisfactory 5 May 12 84.90 Satisfactory 5 Jan 12 98.50 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_AFGM5 (3 Jan 13), Attachment 1, Section 10, Paragraph b, If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury and provides...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03347
Commander memorandum, medical docs, or FAC memorandum). In accordance with (IAW) guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_ Fitness Program AFGM3 (3 Jan 12), Attachment 1, Section 10, If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander. The FSQ should be completed no...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02337
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02337 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 20 Dec 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In support of her appeal she submits an AF Form 469 Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 11 Mar 13, indicating she...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03538
On 15 Feb 13, he was given a AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Qualification Status, which incorrectly authorized him to complete push-ups and sit-ups during FA testing, resulting in failure of his 28 Feb 13 FA because he only completed 10 push-ups. The applicant did not provide the Army version of the profile that was given to him, nor did he provide the original profile that should have been dated and signed by the Medical Provider on or about 15 Feb 13. While the Board notes the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02960
An AF Form 422 dated 5 Oct 11 with the following statement: Cleared for the following AF Fitness assessment components: Ht, Wt, AC, 1.0 mile walk. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, indicating there is no documentation provided by the applicants commander to invalidate the contested FA. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Jan 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04682
The applicants last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 30 Oct 13 82.75 Exempt Satisfactory 28 Aug 13 32.60 32/0.00(1-mile walk) Unsatisfactory *13 Aug 13 71.75 Exempt Unsatisfactory 13 Feb 13 87.00 Exempt Satisfactory 7 Aug 12 80.20 15:52/44.10 Satisfactory * Contested FA A similar request was denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) on 14 Feb 14 on the basis of no letter from the commander to invalidate the Fitness Assessment. Also, no AF Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02331
On 2 Jan 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 Feb 14, applicant provided a memorandum in rebuttal of AFPC/DPSIM and FAAB memoranda. While we note an...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02388
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: There was a discrepancy between restrictions placed on his AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 19 Apr 2012 and the testing exemptions reflected on the AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, dated 20 Apr 2012. On 23 Apr 2012, he took his copy of the AF Form 422 to his scheduled FA. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...