Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04913
Original file (BC-2012-04913.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


AFBCMR BC-2012-04913

MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

	Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that:

	The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to                      ,                                            , be corrected to show that:

	a.  He was ordered to active duty for operational support for a period of two years from 1 September 2010 through 31 August 2012.

	b.  Competent authority approved his request for an Aviator Continuation Pay (ACP) agreement for the above period of service at a rate of $15,000 annually, under the Air National Guard Fiscal Year 2010 ACP program.  His agreement will be honored in full and he will be paid the second (and final) payment of $15,000, effective 1 September 2011.




	
		Director
		Air Force Review Boards Agency

















Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05081

    Original file (BC 2013 05081.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 29 August 2013, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) changed the effective dates of his FY 2010 ACP contract to 24 May 2010 through 3 May 2012. In a memorandum dated 24 February 2012, the Air Force implemented the FY12 ACP program for the Active Duty, Air National Guard and Air Force Reserves. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 January 2014.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05143

    Original file (BC 2012 05143.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR BC-2012-05143 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05082

    Original file (BC 2012 05082.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, ACC agreed to authorize two years of CED travel orders showing intent to remain through the contract. According to the FY 2010 Air National Guard ACP Policy, members are only eligible to apply " ... for the period of time for the orders in hand." ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that competent authority approved...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03788

    Original file (BC-2012-03788.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03788 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he is eligible to participate in the Air National Guard (ANG) Aviator Continuation Pay (ACP) program for fiscal year 2010 (FY10) with a four-year tour service commitment. He applied for the four-year ACP; it...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04300

    Original file (BC 2013 04300.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: After querying the Air Force OPR regarding the applicant’s case, ARPC/DPAF stated that it is entirely possible the applicant’s unit was not properly notified of the ACP program. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that competent authority approved his request for an Aviator Continuation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04059

    Original file (BC-2012-04059.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 11 Jun 12, AFBCMR sent the applicant the SAF/MRB Legal Advisory, dated 9 Apr 13, see Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF recommends approval. The complete NGB/A1PF evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was under the impression that ACP was not authorized at the time he signed his contract only due to Congressional...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04460

    Original file (BC-2012-04460.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was eligible to receive ACP in FY12; however, the message authorizing ACP was not released until 24 Feb 12. On 11 Jun 12, AFBCMR sent the applicant the SAF/MRB Legal Advisory, dated 9 Apr 13, see Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF recommends approval. He realized that there would be a delay in the FY11 [sic] ACP, but it would...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02941

    Original file (BC-2012-02941.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. Based upon the published policy guidance, the fact that the applicant met all eligibility requirements and that the delay in release of the FY12 ACP policy was through no fault of his, they recommend approval of the applicant's requests. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04158

    Original file (BC 2012 04158.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based upon the published policy guidance, the fact that he met all eligibility requirements and that the delay in release of the FY12 ACP policy was through no fault of the member, we recommend approval of the above member's request. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 October 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04158

    Original file (BC-2012-04158.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based upon the published policy guidance, the fact that he met all eligibility requirements and that the delay in release of the FY12 ACP policy was through no fault of the member, we recommend approval of the above member's request. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 October 2012.