AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00114
He be entitled to the award of the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA). As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-00114 in Executive Session on 16 August 2011, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Jan 11, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00126
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00126 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His nonjudicial punishment under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), be set aside or remedial alternatives be implemented to set-aside the punishment. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00130
On 21 Jun 89, the discharge authority approved the general discharge, without P&R. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency. We cannot, however, recommend approval based on the current evidence of record.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00131
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00131 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation be changed to hardship. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: While she was enlisted in the Air Force, she gave birth to her son. Additional relevant facts...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00134
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the FBI provided a copy of an Investigative Report pertaining to the applicant (Exhibit C). On 24 Mar 11, the applicant was provided a copy of the Investigative Report, along with a request for documentation concerning his activities since leaving military service (Exhibit D). Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00136
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00136 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1) Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 3 May 2002, the separation authority approved the discharge and directed she be separated from the Air Force with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00141
Her non-selections to the grade of major (0-4) be removed from her records in order to be hired into the Air Force Reserve (AFR). Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. The advisory does not address the main issue, which is the extreme amount of time it takes to gain a member into the Reserve that resulted in her inability to complete SOS and be selected to major during the promotion boards.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00145
On 27 Oct 58, the Air Force Board of Review affirmed the sentence from the rehearing. The applicants case received several reviews from the Staff Judge Advocate, the Air Force Board of Review and Court. Ultimately, there was no Article 32 hearing, the board was comprised of only officers, and the applicant was not provided a bilingual defense counsel or interpreter The opinion writer stated they did not have access to the court- martial records and cannot make a definitive decision...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00153
Home of Record reflects the residence at the time of entitlement, while state of legal residence reflects the state in which an individual claims as their current residence for legal and tax purposes. At no time was the applicant a resident of Texas prior to entering the USAFA or entering active duty service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00160
DPAPP is unable to confirm the applicant spent any time in Vietnam based on his Master Personnel Records. However, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicants records do not reflect he spent time in Vietnam. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00166
The correct character of service is uncharacterized and the correct narrative reason for separation is conditions not a disability. Uncharacterized service is appropriate in the applicants case because the separation action was initiated within the first 180 days of continuous active service. The DD Form 214 lists the correct separation code as JFV, which coincides with the narrative reason: conditions, not a disability. Unless the board directs otherwise, AFPC will...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00170
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicants military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 16 Nov 10. On 13 Dec 10, the applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to recommend his discharge from the Air Force for Fraudulent Enlistment. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-00170 in Executive...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00171
However, neither the applicant nor his former spouse deemed an election for former spouse coverage under the RCSBP and the applicant's RCSBP election changed to children only. When the member filled out his application for retired pay, DD Form 2656, he made an election for former spouse. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00173
AFBCMR BC-2011-00173 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00175
The AFI indicates that raters should be particularly careful about referring to charges preferred or other information that is not complete as of the closeout of the report; however, there was only a traffic citation issued at the time the report was rendered, but no substantial evidence to validate comments in the report related to his apprehended for driving under the influence (DUI). The contested AF Form 475, dated 29 Feb 08, was rendered upon the applicant and Block III, Comments,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00179
During the period in question, he was given a commander directed evaluation although he was not due an evaluation. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 22 Jul 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00181
Members of the Board, Ms. Rita S. Looney, Mr. Mark J. Novitski, and Mr. Algie Walker Jr. considered this application on 7 April 2011. RITA S. LOONEY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC//DPSOA dtd 18 February 2011 AFBCMR BC-2011-00181 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00191
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00191 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/A1PA recommends denial, stating, in part, the applicant was not denied the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00193
The Record of Trial indicates there was no error or injustice in the applicants case. However, because the applicant requested appellate review and was granted the rehearing of his case, the Air Force extended his enlistment as provided in AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force. AFI 36-3203, Service Retirements, table 2.2., rule 11 authorizes an enlisted member to request to retire in lieu of an administrative discharge action when the member is retirement eligible.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00196
Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the character of service, and assigned separation and RE codes, was appropriately administered and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicants DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to reflect the correct RE code 2C unless otherwise directed by the Board. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00200
There is no evidence the applicant submitted a DD Form 2656-2, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Termination Request, during the disenrollment period. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00204
The VONAPP system cannot be used to transfer this benefit; it must be done using the TEB web site. The applicant used the wrong system; however, he does not claim the Air Force incorrectly counseled him on the transfer process. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00208
AFBCMR BC-2011-00208 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00209
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00209 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code be changed to one that will allow him to re-enter the military. The Medical Consultant lauds the applicants desire to once again serve, and the support he has received from his parents, an employer, his youth pastor, and a...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00211
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00211 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show that he changed the base amount of his spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) from full to a reduced level of retired pay. The Legal Advisor states it appears the applicant was not properly out...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00219
AFBCMR BC-2011-00219 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00221
The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants master personnel records, are contained in the evaluation by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he read the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00222
An exception to policy be granted so that he may be considered by a retroactive Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion to the grade of major after receiving his first officer performance report (OPR) following the relief granted in AFBCMR Docket No. He is not requesting an SSB for the FY01 promotion board. After being granted relief by this Board that has allowed the applicant to resume his career in the Air Force Reserves, the applicant asserts that to remedy the injustice he...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00225
AFBCMR BC-2011-00225 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00226
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFROTC/CC recommends denial. AFROTC/CC advises that Air Force and AFROTC policy states applicants are not eligible for service with the Air Force if they have ever...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00229
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00229 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be evaluated for medical boarding and entry into the Wounded Warrior Program. The Medical Consultant states there is a lack of clear and convincing evidence of an unfitting condition at the time of retirement from active duty service. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00231
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00231 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for his service in Taiwan. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00235
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00235 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code be changed from MDF Pregnancy or Childbirth to hardship. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends correction of the applicants separation code. Therefore, we recommend that the records be...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00237
Packages arriving at ANG/DP after the dates stated will be held for the subsequent ANG Colonels Federal Recognition Review Board. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1POP states there is no action they can take or relief they can grant since the TX ANG has never submitted the applicant for promotion to the grade of colonel. The applicant's complete response is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00241
He provided additional information and was subsequently disapproved twice. While the applicants condition meets the VA requirements for service connected compensation, the evidence does not support additional compensation under CRSC. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement and extracts from his master personnel record.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00245
AFBCMR BC-2011-00245 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00249
Additionally, the RE code of 2C is driven by the involuntary discharge with honorable character of service and is not associated with the applicants narrative reason for separation of Homosexual Admission. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, stating, in part, the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. The applicant's discharge from the Air Force for...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00252
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00252 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). At the same time, the AFBCMR staff offered the applicant an opportunity to provide information pertaining to his activities since leaving the service (Exhibit D). Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00254
She be granted a medical evaluation board (MEB) and be retired for physical disability, instead of being voluntarily transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), effective 6 Jun 09. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was forced to leave the Air Force Reserve due to her illnesses when she should have been recommended for an MEB due to her shoulder surgery and other medical conditions. While we do not find the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00255
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00255 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. DPAPP states there was no official documentation found in the applicants records, nor did the documentation provided substantiate Foreign Service time in the Republic of Vietnam. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00256
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00256 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant is requesting that he be awarded the VSM for service in Vietnam from Nov 61...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00257
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00257 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was physically and sexually attacked while in the Air Force. After 30 years, he...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00265
After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicants complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the VSM. As such, with the exception of the KDSM award that will be administratively added to his records, he is not entitled to any additional awards for his service in Vietnam; therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00272
On 13 Aug 84, Headquarters Fifteenth Air Force approved the discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial and directed the applicant receive an UOTHC discharge. At the same time, the applicant was offered an opportunity to provide information pertaining to his activities since leaving the service (Exhibit D). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00285
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00285 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) be upgraded to a medical or honorable discharge. We therefore agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and the BCMR Medical Consultant and adopt their rationale as...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00287
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00287 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) 4D (grade is Senior Airman or Sergeant, completed at least 9 years TAFMS, but fewer than 16 years TAFMS, and has not been selected for promotion to Staff Sergeant) be changed to a code that will not bar him from enlisting in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00289
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty be corrected to reflect his service in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, supporting Operations DESERT SHIELD and DESERT STORM. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of his request to correct his DD Form 214 to reflect his service in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicants complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00291
AFBCMR BC-2011-00291 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00292
After serving his 30-days of confinement, he was informed he was being recommended for an undesirable discharge. He understood if his request for discharge was approved that his separation from the Air Force could be under conditions other than honorable and he could receive an undesirable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00294
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-00294 in Executive Session on 4 May 11, under the...