RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00265 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM) (Will be administratively corrected) and the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214 does not reflect the VSM for his service in Saigon Okinawa, and to CCK Air Base, Taiwan, Republic of China while assigned to Kadena Air Base from 1973 to 1974. The KDSM is retroactive to the end of the Korean conflict, but was not approved while he was in country from 1981 to 1982. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and personal statements. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant retired on 1 Nov 87 in the grade of master sergeant. He is credited with 5 years, 1 month, and 12 days of Foreign Service. Additionally, he has prior U. S. Navy service. HQ AFPC/DPAPP was able to verify and confirm boots on ground at Kadena Air Base, Japan, from May 1974 to July 1975 and Kunsan Air Base, Republic of Korea, from May 1981 to May 1982. The VSM is awarded to all service members of the Armed Forces who, between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, served in the following areas of Southeast Asia: Vietnam and the contiguous waters and airspace, Thailand, Laos or Cambodia or the airspace there-over and in direct support of operations in Vietnam. A service member must have served on temporary duty for 30 consecutive days or 60 non-consecutive days to be eligible for award of the VSM. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial for award of the VSM. DPSIDR states they were able to verify the applicant’s entitlement to the KDSM and the records will be administratively corrected to reflect this entitlement. DPSIDR states no documentation was provided or could be located to substantiate the applicant served in Vietnam or in any of the areas of eligibility for award of the VSM. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13 May 11 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has not received a response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the VSM. As such, with the exception of the KDSM award that will be administratively added to his records, he is not entitled to any additional awards for his service in Vietnam; therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend favorable consideration of his application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. __________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-00265 in Executive Session on 21 July 2011, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 January 2011, w/atch. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. AFPC/DPAPP, Letter, dated 8 April 2011. Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSIDR, Letter, dated 4 May 2011. Exhibit E. SAF/MRBR, Letter, dated 13 May 2011, w/atchs. Panel Chair