AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04360
INDEX CODE: 100.00 AFBCMR BC-2010-04360 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04394
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04394 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation code “FND” be changed to reflect she is eligible for separation pay. DPSOS notes based on the documentation in the applicant’s master personnel record, they did not find any errors or injustice in the processing of the applicant’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04404
AFBCMR BC-2010-04404 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04420
The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/RSOO recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04432
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AETC/SGPS recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his character of service and RE code. However, barring evidence in the applicant’s enlistment documents the condition existed prior to his entrance on active duty. DPSOA states the applicant’s RE code 2C is required per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the United States Air Force, chapter 3, based on his involuntary discharge with an...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04439
AFBCMR BC-2010-04439 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04494
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. It appears the applicant’s discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation in effect at the time, and within the commander’s discretionary authority. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04506
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS However, while convening authority subsequently approved the findings of guilty with regard to the violations of Article 134, the finding of guilty for the charge and second specification of the Article 113 violation was not approved and approved only so much of the sentence as provided for the BCD, six months of confinement, forfeiture of $249.00 pay per month for six months and a reduction to the grade of airman basic. There is no...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04523
AFBCMR BC-2010-04523 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04524
AFBCMR BC-2010-04524 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04531
AFBCMR BC-2010-04531 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04538
AFBCMR BC-2010-04538 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04552
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board, Ms. Barbara J. Barger, Mr. Algie Walker, Jr., and Ms. Catherine M. Bromley considered this application on 2 August 2011. BARBARA J. BARGER Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPPO dtd 25 April 2011 AFBCMR BC-2010-04552 MEMORANDUM FOR THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04559
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records Exhibit C. FBI Investigative Report. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 29 Dec 10, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04565
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04565 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service records be corrected to reflect he was promoted to the rank of captain with an effective date of 13 Jul 07. In addition, Air Force policy states that formal rules of evidence do not apply to a promotion propriety action. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04635
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04635 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service records be corrected to reflect award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM) for his service in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04709
AFBCMR BC-2010-04709 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04742
Members of the Board, Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Mr. Barry J. Hennessey, and Ms. Lynda T. O’Sullivan considered this application on 9 March 2011. MICHAEL V. BARBINO Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPSOA dtd 21 January 2011 AFBCMR BC-2010-04742 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-2122
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02122 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. He was discharged on 7 Jul 58 with a general discharge under the provisions of Air Force Regulation 39-16 (Inaptitude/Unsuitability). Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2010-02122 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011- 00800
Based on a review of the records provided, the applicant entered the service on 1 Jun 10 and was separated 23 Jun 10. The complete AETC/SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends changing the applicant’s RE code to 2C, - "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service. Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00004
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00004 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive a waiver of the recoupment of his pro-rata share of unserved active duty service commitment (ADSC) associated with his United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) scholarship. Other relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00009
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 6 July 2010, the applicant was awarded the Defense Meritorious Service Medal for Exceptional Meritorious Service for the Armed Forces of the United States. On 20 October 2010, the Missile Defense Agency awards manager amended the Military Personnel Award Order Number 2010-40, dated 7 July 2010, to read 29 June 2010 rather than 6 July 2010. On 1 March 2011, the applicant retired from the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00010
4) His UOTHC discharge characterization failed to reflect his honorable character in the Air Force, exemplified in his service record and in the recommendations of his superiors. His ex-wifes testimony proved pivotal to the outcome of the proceedings; in which the BOI recommended a UOTHC discharge; and ignored his entire service record and the recommendations of his superiors, and belied his years of honorable service. _________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00022
He feels he should have been referred to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) prior to his non-selection for reenlistment. A complete copy of the DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibits D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 July 2011, for review and comment within 30 days. We note the applicants contention that he should have been considered by an MEB for...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00024
On 17 September 2010, the applicant submitted a letter to AFPC/DPSOR and SAFPC, requesting retirement, with an effective date of 1 June 2011. DPSOR states the applicant submitted a retirement application to his commander less than two months prior to his deployment date. The commander recommended denial for a 1 June 2011 retirement date so the applicant would have sufficient time to out-process after his deployment.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00025
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 25 Mar 11, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2011-00025 in Executive Session on 9 Jun 11, under the provisions of AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026
AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00031
She has recently been diagnosed as Bi-Polar with Impulse Control Disorder. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00033
The Air Force determined that members with a retirement date of 1 Aug 09 were technically not on duty such that they could transfer benefits since their last duty day was 31 Jul 09. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00039
Between February and September 1961, the applicant was counseled six times; three for failing to report for duty on time, once for failing to keep his room in inspection order, and twice for failing to report for duty. On 4 October 1961, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge in the grade of airman basic. We have considered the applicants overall record of service, the events which precipitated the discharge, and the contents...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00039 ADDENDUM
ADDENDUM RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00039 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Always on time for work, doing his job well and not causing any problems. During that time, he married and had a daughter.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00042
However, he did not provide any documentation supporting that contention, and based on his earliest retirement eligibility date, the applicant was not eligible to transfer benefits without an additional service commitment at the programss 1 Aug 09 inception. Had he known his ADSC waiver would have been disapproved, he would have applied for the TEB in Oct 09 with plenty of time to fulfill the requisite ADSC by the time he eventually retired in Jan 11. We took notice of the applicant's...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00044 ADDENDUM
JA states that unfortunately, the evidence the applicant presents indicates the former service member understood his actions well enough at the time he declined coverage to manipulate others and lie convincingly to get what he wanted. Rather than an incompetent person at the time he made his elections, the documents indicate he had become an immoral person. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00047
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00047 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) 2C (involuntary separation with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow him entry into the Air National Guard. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00056
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: A letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 20 December 2010, indicates he is authorized the KDSM for his more than 30 days of service at Suwon Air Base, Korea. In addition, he has provided a letter from the NPRC attesting to the fact that he served more than 30 days in Korea as a member of the Rapid Area Distribution Support (RADS) Team and, that he is entitled to the KDSM. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00062
She indicates there is no evidence the deceased former member elected former spouse coverage for any of his former spouses. In Dec 92, DFAS received an SBP Open Enrollment Election form from the member requesting to change the applicants coverage from spouse to former spouse. A complete copy of the AFRBA Legal Advisor evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00066
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She intended to transfer some of her benefits to her daughter to attend college in Feb 10, but was unable to access the Air Force Portal sites to complete the transfer. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibits...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00067
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00067 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation and separation program designator (SPD) code be reviewed. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was discharged under Phase II of the force shaping...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00071
His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant was sent a letter requesting additional documentation to confirm his Vietnam Service; however, the documentation he provided did not verify that he served on a TDY assignment for more than 30 days. After reviewing the documentation submitted, we believe, the applicant has provided sufficient evidence to support award of the VSM.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00074
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force provided discipline without counseling. The applicants complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-00074 in Executive Session on 7 Sep 11, under...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00078
Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. The DPSOO complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicants spouse reiterates her original contentions; however, she wants her husbands Officer Evaluation Report (OER) examined to see why he would be promoted to major below-the-zone and then...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00079
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. It appears the applicant’s discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation in effect at the time, and within the commander’s discretionary authority. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00080
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00080 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be promoted to the grades of senior master sergeant (E-8) and chief master sergeant (E-9). The applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00081
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00081 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) that was incurred as a result of the Post 9/11 GI Bill transfer of education benefits (TEB) to his dependent children be changed from 8 April 2014 to 19 August 2013. The complete AF/A1PA evaluation is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00088
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00088 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His honorable discharge be changed to a medical discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1POE does not provide a recommendation. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 May 11.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00093
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00093 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00095
His claim also qualifies for a loss of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) compensation, as his injuries involved a traumatic brain injury (TBI). The applicants complete submission was thoroughly reviewed and his contentions were duly noted; however, no evidence has been presented that convinces us the applicant met the eligibility criteria for traumatic injury protection under the TSGLI program. Therefore, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00106
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/A1K recommends denial. AFRC/A1K states after reviewing the documentation provided by the applicant he has failed to provide a completed AF IMT 348 with a recommendation and signature from the appointing authority; an AF IMT...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00108
By letter dated 25 May 11, HQ AFPC/DPSOAA states there is no evidence to support the applicants deceased grandfather enlisted rather than being inducted under the selective service system which was highly active during WWII. His date of induction is recorded in block 22 as 16 Feb 42, matching his date of entry on active duty recorded in block 24. The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00110
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00110 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/A1PA makes no recommendation, but notes that if the Board finds there was...