Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00204
Original file (BC-2011-00204.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00204 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
son. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He attempted to transfer this benefit to his son and daughter in 
2009. He assumed the transfer was completed until he received 
an e-mail in October 2010 informing him that he had not 
transferred any benefits. It appears none of the applications 
he submitted on the VA benefits web site were processed. His 
son turned 23 in April 2010. He is no longer eligible for the 
transfer. 

 

The applicant submits no supporting documentation. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently active duty serving in the grade 
Colonel/O6. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

USAF/A1PA recommends denial. The Department of Veterans Affairs 
(DVA), Department of Defense (DoD) and the Military Services 
widely publicized the Post-911/GI Bill and the transferability 
feature of this specially developed website to facilitate the 
transfer of educational benefits (TEB). The system was 
available on 27 June 2009 for the purpose of transferring 
benefits. The Directive Type Memo and the Air Force Instruction 
required the transfer application to be made using the TEB 
website. 

 


The applicant states he used the DVA Online Application (VONAPP) 
to transfer his benefits to his son and daughter in 2009, but 
has no documentation to support this contention. The VONAPP 
system cannot be used to transfer this benefit; it must be done 
using the TEB web site. The applicant used the wrong system; 
however, he does not claim the Air Force incorrectly counseled 
him on the transfer process. 

 

The complete A1PA evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 4 March 2011, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant was not denied the opportunity to transfer benefits to 
his son and he has not provided evidence that he was 
miscounseled. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-00204 in Executive Session on 12 March 2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Jan 11. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, USAF/A1PA, dated 28 Feb 11. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Mar 11. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01784

    Original file (BC-2011-01784.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant does not provide any evidence that he submitted an application on or about 16 January 2011. The A1PA complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states his spouse decided to further her education and he would like to transfer his benefits to his spouse. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01573

    Original file (BC-2011-01573.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He again tried to transfer the education benefits and found out that he might not be eligible to transfer the benefits. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant notes his application to transfer education benefits was not untimely.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02291

    Original file (BC-2011-02291.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02291 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. A1PA reviewed the DMDC’s TEB database that confirmed the applicant did not apply to transfer his benefits before his 1 Dec 10 retirement. To date, a response has not been...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01722

    Original file (BC-2011-01722.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01722 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, has at least 6...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00815

    Original file (BC-2011-00815.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00815 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His active duty service commitment (ADSC) for transferring his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents be corrected to reflect an expiration date of 24 Jun 11. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01337

    Original file (BC-2011-01337.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was not denied the opportunity to transfer benefits while on active duty, and he provided no evidence to support governmental injustice or error. Had he been counseled or warned, he would have made sure benefits were transferred before retiring from active duty. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00854

    Original file (BC-2011-00854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/A1PA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant stated he started the VONAPP process; perhaps he tried to transfer his benefits to his dependents in this system and not the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00454

    Original file (BC-2010-00454.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was advised during his retirement out-processing that all he needed to do was complete the required forms to transfer his GI benefits to his dependents before he retired. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 August 2009 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air Force personnel. The complete HQ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01105

    Original file (BC-2011-01105.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01105 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In August 2009, the Education Center on Bolling AFB briefed that active duty members may only transfer Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to dependents. If the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00755

    Original file (BC-2011-00755.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00755 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent son. He was relieved from active duty, on 31 May 2010, with a reason for separation voluntary retirement sufficient service for retirement. Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member...