AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01240
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01240 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be restored 4 days of leave. For ending on a non-duty day, the day of return shall not be charged as a day of leave. Air Force Guidance Memorandum 2, dated 8 April 2011, revised AFI 36-3003, Table 1, Rule 3, to reflect the following: If a...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01241
AFBCMR BC-2011-01241 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01247
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Thailand and Vietnam; however, his orders and record copies reflecting his service from 1966 through 1977 are missing. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement; a copy of his DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued in conjunction with his 28 Aug 70 discharge; an extract of an airman performance report (APR); a statement from a former...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01248
AFBCMR BC-2011-01248 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01253
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He applied to transfer from the MGIB to the Post 9/11 GI Bill in February 2010 but was advised by the Nellis education office to wait one year to apply for TEB. A&FRCs use a standardized briefing that informs members there are additional service commitments associated with transferring Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits and they should seek additional counseling if interested in transferring benefits. As...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01255
On 28 June 1988, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge in the grade of airman basic. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01258
The KDSM is awarded for military service in the Republic of Korea (ROK) and surrounding waters after 28 July 1954, to a date to be determined by the Secretary of Defense. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01260
She would not have done a DITY move had she known the correct rate provided no incentive and resulted in extra costs. Effective 1 April 2010, change 283 to the JFTR requires that Government Constructed Costs (GCC) used to determine the incentive payments in PPM be based on best value versus the low cost charges. Although it does appear the applicant was miscounseled regarding the amount of reimbursement she could expect to receive for a Personally Procured Move, she was fully...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01268
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01268 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. He requests his discharge be upgraded based on clemency. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01271
He receive deployment credit for his service in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM and INFINITE JUSTICE. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP gave no recommendation and requests the Board review the available master personnel record (MPR) and determine whether the applicant deployed in support of Operations INFINITE JUSTICE and ENDURING FREEDOM. Should the applicant be able to provide additional evidence to substantiate...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01272
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: While serving on extended active duty (EAD), she was injured and involuntarily released from active duty prior to her medical condition being resolved. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1PS recommends denial, stating, in part, at this time there is no documentation provided showing the applicant was unable to perform ~military duties...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01280
There is no evidence whether this is the case here, but in such a case, the applicants commander could also have charged the applicant with dereliction of duty or violation of a lawful order, in violation of Article 92, UCMJ. After considering the matters raised by the applicant, the commander determined that the applicant had committed the offense alleged and imposed punishment on the applicant. The applicant has not provided any evidence showing that the imposing commander or the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01283
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01283 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, epilepsy be assessed as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. The evidence of record does not support a finding that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01284
AFBCMR BC-2011-01284 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01285
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01285 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with an additional 23 days of active duty for pay and points. In addition, his LES reflects that he was paid and credited for the following training periods: 16 29 Jun 10 AD 30 Jun 11 Jul 10 IDT 1 15 Aug 10 AD On 9 Sep 10, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01286
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01286 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Cardio Results of his 30 Sep 10 Fitness Assessment (FA) be changed to reflect he was Exempt, rather than Incomplete. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was injured during the aerobic...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01293
The CRSC program is designed to provide compensation for combat- related injuries. The available evidence of record does not support a finding that the service- connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat- related were incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war; and, therefore, does not qualify for compensation under the CRSC Act. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01300
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01300 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his award of the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01301
X In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and her 2009 and 2010 Form 1099R, Tax Statements. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01312
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01312 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Article 15 be expunged from his record and the resulting negative information be expunged from his security background. The Air Force Automated Military Justice Analysis and Management System (AMJAMS) does not show a vacation action relating to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01315
Though the applicant notes Reserve duties aggravated his condition, there is no evidence in the Reserve orders or medical record that support his claim. The applicant points out that SG accurately states, according to documentation from the Department of Veterans Affairs that the associated disability originated from his service while on active duty and is service connected. c. He submits documentation from his medical records to support his claim that his Reserve duties aggravated his...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01315 ADDENDUM
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-1315 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive a medical retirement from the Air Force Reserve rather than being discharged. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants discharge; and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01323
The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was mailed to the applicant on 30 September 2011, for review and comments within 30 days. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01329
The complete DPSDC evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He has never hidden the fact he had a knee injury prior to his Air Force career. The available evidence of record and the documentation provided by the applicant does not support a finding that his service- connected knee conditions he believes are combat-related were incurred as the direct result of armed conflict,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01331
The Board recommended the applicant be discharged from the Air Force with an undesirable discharge. Accordingly, we recommend that his records be corrected as indicated below. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 22 Jul 11.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01332
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was judged as exhibiting misconduct because he refused to surrender his weapon to someone other than the armorer. His punishment consisted of reduction to the grade of airman, with a new date of rank (DOR) of 4 June 2002, forfeiture of $200 per month for two months (however it was suspended until 3 December 2002, after which time it was to be remitted without further action unless sooner vacated),...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01333
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01333 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 25.5 days of leave be restored and she receive payment for those days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01334
She would not have done a DITY move had she known the correct rate provided no incentive and resulted in extra costs. Effective 1 April 2010, change 283 to the JFTR requires that Government Constructed Costs (GCC) used to determine the incentive payments in PPM be based on best value versus the low cost charges. Although it does appear the applicant was miscounseled regarding the amount of reimbursement she could expect to receive for a Personally Procured Move, she was fully...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01337
The applicant was not denied the opportunity to transfer benefits while on active duty, and he provided no evidence to support governmental injustice or error. Had he been counseled or warned, he would have made sure benefits were transferred before retiring from active duty. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01338
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01338 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable and her rank be restored. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01342
The applicant had three opportunities to elect SBP coverage for his wife, but failed to do so. The complete DPSIAR evaluation is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01343
The complete DPSIAR evaluation is at Exhibit C. On 19 Dec 11, the applicant was provided advisories prepared by the SAF/MRB Legal Advisor, HQ USAF/JAA, and SAF/GCM on similar cases considered by the Board. The applicant asserts that the divorce decree issued to her and the deceased former member awarded her benefits under SBP. ___________________________________________________________ __ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01345
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01345 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The fitness assessment (FA) score she received on 29 December 2010 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01350
Her original blood clot was from a mutation called Factor V Leiden, but her condition worsened by the size of the clot, which caused her vein to be enlarged. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 30 June 2010 her condition of Post-Phlebitic Syndrome and venous insufficiency of the right internal jugular vein was found to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01355
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. The application was timely filed. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01357
DPSOE states the first time the decoration in question (worth one point) would have been used in the promotion process was cycle 08E6 to the grade of TSgt. At the time of the DPSOE evaluation, the applicant had been considered and non-selected for promotion to TSgt three times (cycles 08E6, 09E6, and 10E6). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01358
__________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who was considered and not selected for retention by the CY10A Lt Col SERB. The remaining relevant facts extracted from the applicant military service records are contained in the evaluations by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility at Exhibits B and C. __________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01366
Her Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 8 July 2009, be expunged from her Officer Selection Record (OSR). The applicant filed an appeal through the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB); however, the ERAB was not convinced the report was unjust or inaccurate and denied her request for relief. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military service records, are contained in the evaluations by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility at Exhibits C...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01371
His DD Form 214 is missing the GCM with three loops, UNSM, KSM with a Bronze Arrowhead and two BSSs, RKPUC, AFEM, VSM, AFCM, AM, PUC with three BOLCs, PH Medal, Senior Missile Badge, and Senior Air Crew Member Badge. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) and AFBCMR Medical Consultant, which are included at Exhibits C, D, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01372
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01372 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be updated to reflect award of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01377
To be eligible, a service member must be: 1) attached to or regularly serving for one of more days with an organization participating in ground and/or shore (military) operations, 2) attached to or regularly serving for one or more days aboard a navy vessel directly supporting military operations, 3) actually participating as a crew member in one or more aerial flights directly supporting military operations in the areas of responsibility, 4) serving on temporary duty (TDY) for 30...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01380
The BCMR Medical Consultant states more likely than not the applicant would have been found unfit for military service only for his left knee ailment with no greater than the 10 percent rating he has received via DVA adjudication. Although the applicant's left knee condition reportedly resulted from a service incurred injury while playing basketball in 1990, it appears that he may have also been administratively released from military service, under the provision of AFI 36-3209, Separation...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01385
Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to show that: a. on 2 December 2009, he elected to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits. His active duty service commitment date (ADSC) reflect 1 December 2011. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, USAF/A1PA, dtd 25 May 2011 AFBCMR BC-2011-01385 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01386
AFBCMR BC-2011-01386 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01387
AFBCMR BC-2011-01387 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01396
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01396 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Missions flown between 74 and 76, during in peace time do not support award of the AM for sustained operational activities or flights. Additionally, the applicant failed to provide any official evidence to support award of the AM for heroism or...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01398
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request to change or remove her EPR. While it appears the applicant performed [her duties] extremely well during the reporting period, the failed fitness...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01401
He receive a copy of the order and the narrative for the MSM. In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of his DD Form 214, and various other documents associated with his request. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 2011-01401 in Executive Session on 1 Dec 11 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01404
AFBCMR BC-2011-01404 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01405
AFBCMR BC-2011-01405 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board, considered this application on 9 August 2011. Executive Director Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records