RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01286 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Cardio Results of his 30 Sep 10 Fitness Assessment (FA) be changed to reflect he was “Exempt,” rather than “Incomplete.” ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was injured during the aerobic portion of the contested FA. He was told to immediately report to the hospital and procure a medical profile that would exempt him from the run. He was told he would have to provide the profile paperwork within five days of the test. He was finally seen by the podiatrist on 4 Oct 10. He was issued an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, stating he was not to run between the dates of 30 Sep 10 through 4 Apr 11. Though he stayed in constant contact with the medical personnel accomplishing his paperwork, it still took an inordinate amount of time to be approved and was not submitted in time to remove the Incomplete from his Cardio Results score. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement and copies of his AF Form 469, AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Therefore, there is no need to recite these facts in this record of proceedings. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAF/A1PP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant injured his foot during the 1.5 mile run portion of his FA. He immediately reported to the medical treatment facility for evaluation. His health care provider issued him an AF Form 469 on 4 Oct 10, indicting he was restricted from running during the period 30 Sep 10 through 4 Apr 11. At the time of his FA failure, AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, paragraph 2.4, states that all components of an FA must be rescheduled at the earliest opportunity if extenuating circumstances exist that prevent completion of the test. In short, there is no provision to grant his single component recalculation request. This request was reviewed by the medical subject matter expert at the Air Force Medical Support Agency who concurs with this recommendation. A complete copy of the AF/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 23 Sep 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been adequately rebutted by the applicant. Absent persuasive evidence the applicant was denied rights to which he was entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-01286 in Executive Session on 2 Feb 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Mar 11, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AF/A1PP, undated. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Sep 11. Panel Chair