Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01372
Original file (BC-2011-01372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01372 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, be updated to reflect award of the Air 
Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was awarded the AFCM after leaving Vietnam and separating from 
active duty. The AFCM was not updated on his DD Form 214. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in 
this Record of Proceedings. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIDR reviewed this application and recommends denial. The 
applicant served on active duty from 1 Apr 66 through 3 Aug 70. 
The applicant’s entitlement to the AFCM could not be verified. 
There was no official documentation provided or in his personnel 
records verifying his entitlement to the AFCM. The AFCM is 
awarded to service members of the Armed Forces who served in any 
capacity with the Air Force after 24 Mar 58, who distinguished 
themselves by meritorious achievement and service. The degree of 
merit must be distinctive. The acts of courage does not have to 
involve the voluntary risk of life required for the Soldier’s 
Medal (or the Airman’s Medal now authorized for the Air Force) 
may be considered for the AFCM. 

 

 

 


The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 
20 May 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After careful 
consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence 
of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to 
warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated in the 
advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and 
have not been adequately rebutted by applicant. Absent 
persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which he was 
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or 
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to 
disturb the existing record. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-01372 in Executive Session on 27 Oct 11, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

 


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-01372 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Apr 11. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 10 May 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 May 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02366

    Original file (BC-2011-02366.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02366 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) be updated on his Officer Selection Brief and he be considered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY10D Major Central Selection Board for promotion. In support of his request, the applicant provides a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00560

    Original file (BC-2011-00560.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFCM is awarded to service members of the Armed Forces who served in any capacity with the Air Force after 24 Mar 58, who distinguished themselves by meritorious achievement and service. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2011-00217

    Original file (bc-2011-00217.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, he provides two personal memoranda, dated 22 Mar 10 and 11 Feb 12; letters of support from his Commander during the specified tour of duty, dated 20 Jan 10 and 25 Jan 12; letter of support from the Squadron’s Operations Officer, dated 5 Oct 10; Evaluation Reports and Appeals Board (ERAB) decision to rescind the EPR (case#2812143), dated 30 Nov 10; second request for AFCM, 1 OLC re-instatement, dated 11 Feb 12; and justification memorandum from the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01975

    Original file (BC-2011-01975.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This order becomes a permanent part of his military personnel file, and can be attached to his DD Form 214 reflecting the final disposition of permanent retirement. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the AFCM. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01100

    Original file (BC-2011-01100.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC has verified the applicant’s entitlement to the Bronze Star Medal, Air Force Commendation with 1 bronze OLC, Presidential Unit Citation, Air Force Good Conduct Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with one silver star and three bronze service stars, Air Force Longevity Service Award, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Armed Forces Honor Medal. The complete DPSIDR evaluation, with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04634

    Original file (BC-2011-04634.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits B and C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial. The applicant was considered and tentatively selected for promotion to master sergeant during promotion cycle 11E7. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02642

    Original file (BC-2011-02642.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02642 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His basic Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), for the period Apr 01 thru Apr 02 be placed into his records. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record we are not persuaded his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04477

    Original file (BC-2011-04477.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04477 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The former member’s records be updated to reflect award of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). After a thorough review of the applicant’s military personnel records and provided documentation, DPSIDR was unable to locate official...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03297

    Original file (BC-2011-03297.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided an unsigned certificate and citation for his service with the 19 Tactical Air Support Squadron, Bien Hoa Air Base, Republic of Vietnam; however, no special order could be located verifying the applicant was submitted for, or ever awarded the AFCM. The complete DPSIDR evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response to the Air Force advisory opinion,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01604

    Original file (BC 2011 01604.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this respect, we note the AFCM certificate and citation, provided by the applicant, indicates the decoration was awarded to him on 1 Jul 1969 for meritorious service. Although the applicant has not provided a copy of the order awarding the AFCM, we find the documentation the applicant has provided sufficient to resolve any doubt in his favor. Therefore, we recommend his record be corrected as indicated below _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...