RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01260
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
She be compensated for her Personally Procured Move (PPM) as
briefed to her by Hickam Transportation Management Office (TMO).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The TMO office incorrectly used low cost rates to counsel her
on her PPM application rather than the newly implemented Best
Value rates. As such, the counselor incorrectly estimated the
amount of compensation she would receive for a Do-it-Yourself
(DITY) move. She would not have done a DITY move had she known
the correct rate provided no incentive and resulted in extra
costs.
In support of her appeal, the applicant provides a letter from
the Commander, and other forms associated with her move.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is in the Regular Air Force serving in the grade
of technical sergeant.
On 27 April 2010, pursuant to Permanent Change of Station
orders, from Hickam AFB, HI to Eglin AFB FL, the applicant was
counseled on PPMs. The applicant was quoted $22,111.584 as the
Estimated Gross Incentive to personally procure her move.
Based on that amount, the applicant was given an advance payment
of $13,965.21.
On 6 August 2010, the Eglin TMO computed the applicants actual
cost as 9,098.01. Since the applicant received an advance, she
owed the government, $4,422.21. On 5 January 2011, the Air
Force remitted that debt.
Effective 1 April 2010, change 283 to the JFTR requires that
Government Constructed Costs (GCC) used to determine the
incentive payments in PPM be based on best value versus the
low cost charges.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
PPA HQ/ECAF recommends denial. ECAF states the JFTR requires
the members incentive be based on 95 percent of the GCC, and at
the time of the applicants shipment, the GCC was based on best
value rates. The applicants total moving expenses totaled
$9098.01. Although, she did not receive as much incentive as
she was initially advised, she did not lose any money on the
PPM. The applicant applied for and was approved for a remission
of the debt established for the excess advance payment she
received in the amount of $4,422.21.
The complete ECAF evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 29 July 2011, for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has not received a
response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting
the relief sought in this application. Although it does appear
the applicant was miscounseled regarding the amount of
reimbursement she could expect to receive for a Personally
Procured Move, she was fully compensated for her move and in
reality received a de facto incentive through remission of the
debt she incurred for the excess advance she initially received.
We believe this constitutes proper and fitting relief.
Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of PPA
HQ/ECAF and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice
warranting further action by this Board. In the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-01260 in Executive Session on 8 September 2011,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Vice Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Mar 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. PPA HQ/ECAF, Letter, dated 21 Jul 11.
Exhibit D. SAF/MRBR, Letter, dated 29 Jul 11.
Vice Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01334
She would not have done a DITY move had she known the correct rate provided no incentive and resulted in extra costs. Effective 1 April 2010, change 283 to the JFTR requires that Government Constructed Costs (GCC) used to determine the incentive payments in PPM be based on best value versus the low cost charges. Although it does appear the applicant was miscounseled regarding the amount of reimbursement she could expect to receive for a Personally Procured Move, she was fully...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01423
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded by stating that he did not receive the briefing regarding the change in the JFTR until 25 Jun 10, two full months after the change. The TMO agreed to allow him to cancel the PPM. Although it does appear the applicant was miscounseled regarding the amount of reimbursement he could expect to receive for a Personally Procured Move, he was fully compensated for...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01032
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01032 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be compensated for his Personally Procured Move (PPM) as briefed to him by the Hickam Transportation Management Office (TMO). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The TMO office incorrectly...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02483
He would not have done a DITY move had he known the correct rate provided no incentive and resulted in extra costs. On 2 Apr 12, PPA HQ ECAF amended paragraph 6 of their original Air Force evaluation to read should the Board choose to provide the applicant the relief he is seeking, recommend the records be changed to reflect that under competent authority, the PPM was processed on 1 Apr 10 resulting in the utilization of low cost rates under the Transportation Operational Personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01992
Had he been briefed correctly, he would not have agreed to a PPM that provided no incentive and resulted in excess costs. Although it does appear the applicant was miscounseled regarding the amount of reimbursement he could expect to receive for a Personally Procured Move, he was fully compensated for his move and in reality received a de facto incentive through remission of the debt incurred for the excess advance initially received. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Oct 11.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01577
ECAF states the JFTR requires that a members incentive be based upon 95 percent of the GCC, and at the time of the applicants shipment, the GCC was based upon the best value rates reflected in the DPS. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). Although it does appear the applicant was miscounseled regarding the amount of reimbursement he could expect to receive for a PPM, he was fully compensated for his move and in reality received a de facto incentive through remission...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01499
The applicant completed a DD Form 2278, Application for Do-it-Yourself Move and Counseling Checklist, and was quoted an estimated incentive payment of $19,524.78 to personally procure his move. Based on that amount, the applicant was given an advance payment of $12,331.44. ECAF recommends the applicant be reimbursed for any funds personally expended in excess of the authorized GCC.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03079
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03079 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be compensated for his personally procured move (PPM) as briefed to him by the Hickam Traffic Management Office (TMO), or in the alternative cover the actual cost of the PPM. He was only compensated $8,370.24, which did not cover the total move...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02715
The applicant completed a DD Form 2278, Application for Do-It-Yourself Move and Counseling Checklist, and was quoted an estimated incentive payment of $17,689.20 to personally procure his move. Based on that amount, the applicant was given an advance payment of $10,613.52. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C).
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01139
The complete DD evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant stated the advisory falsely states that he did not lose any money. The recommendation only considers the gross amount and reimbursable expenses. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting the relief sought in this application.