RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01345
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The fitness assessment (FA) score she received on 29 December
2010 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System
(AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
During the run/cardio portion of the physical fitness (PT) test,
she became ill and left the track. It is her belief that the
test should have been terminated at that time.
In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of her
AFFMS Individual Test History, AF Form 469, Duty Limiting
Condition Report, AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force
Members Qualification Status, and a letter addressed to the 43rd
Medical Squadron/SGGF from her psychologist.
Her complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of Staff Sergeant (SSgt).
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application
extracted from the applicants military personnel records are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force (Exhibit C). Accordingly there is no need to
recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
USAF/A1PP recommends denial. A1PP states the applicant became
ill during her fitness assessment and left the track. However,
she has a run time of 16:37 annotated on her AFFMS history which
is consistent with her previous run times. The applicant does
not provide any additional information to support her position
that she left the track. The A1PP medical subject matter expert
reviewed applicants attached letter from the psychologist as
well as her AF Form 469 and determined the referenced medical
condition diagnosed as Code 300.00 Anxiety State, Unspecified
would not apply to the test failure of 29 December 2010.
The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant provided an undated letter with two attachments.
The first attachment dated 19 May 2011 is a letter of support
from a Technical Sergeant who was with applicant during the run
portion of the PT test on 29 December 2010. The second
attachment dated 23 May 2011 is from the applicants
psychologist stating that the applicant completed psychotherapy
between 21 January 2011 and 6 April 2011 for acute performance
anxiety when faced with taking a PT test and that she will work
with the applicant to find a referral to a psychologist since
the applicant has been relocated to the state of Arizona during
the course of this application.
The applicants complete response is at Exhibit E
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After a
thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's
submission, we see no evidence of error or impropriety in the
physical fitness test and subsequent fitness assessment score.
Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the
rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the
applicant has failed to sustain her burden of having suffered
either an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered this application
BC-2011-01345 in Executive Session on 12 January 2011, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Vice Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 April 2011, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ USAF/A1PP, dated 28 April 2011.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 May 2011.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, undated w/atchs.
Vice Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03584
He still felt pain in his left knee and the cool weather seemed to intensify the pain level. RMG/CC states, the applicants records indicate he was eligible for promotion with a 1 Jan 2011 effective date. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03584
He still felt pain in his left knee and the cool weather seemed to intensify the pain level. RMG/CC states, the applicants records indicate he was eligible for promotion with a 1 Jan 2011 effective date. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02932
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02932 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her fitness assessments, dated 8 September 2010 and 27 October 2010, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02702
He asks the Board to consider his medical conditions and complications and how they have negatively impacted his ability to meet the Air Forces fitness requirements in relation to the new abdominal circumference, and how his long term affliction of obstructive sleep apnea has notably affected his fitness assessment scores in previous years. The applicant's complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01118
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01118 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The fitness assessment (FA) score he received on 31 Jan 11 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was exempt from 3 of the 4...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04609
Her 16 November 2010, 14 February 2011, 5 January 2012, 3 April 2012, and 2 July 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) scores be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends approval of the applicants request to have her 16 November 2010, 14 February 2011, 5 January 2012, 3 April 2012, and 2 July 2012 Fitness Assessments removed from the Air Force Fitness...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03826
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. A1PP recommends removing the 9 August 2011 FA score from AFFMS due to supporting documentation from the applicants evaluating physician and treating physical therapist. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02102
After a thorough review of the available records, the majority of the Board found no evidence that the applicants referral EPR is unjust or inaccurate. In accordance with Air Force Instruction 36- 2502, table 1.1, Rule 22, receipt of a referral report renders a member ineligible for promotion; therefore, a majority of the Board recommends denying her request to reinstate her line number for promotion to technical sergeant. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 01883
She states that the MTF failed to initiate an AF Form 469 in a timely manner, and that she was not placed on a FA exemption until Nov 10. SAF/IG also states that Because these abnormal X-ray results were not communicated to her until Oct 10, almost a year later, she dutifully continued to comply with the muscular plan of care treatments that resulted in an Air Force FA failure for pushups, even with continuing symptoms. In fact, the applicant achieved a perfect score of 10/10 points on...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02279
The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOE states, should the Board remove the three fitness failures from the applicants record, DPSOE recommends revoking the demotion orders and restoring the applicants rank to staff sergeant. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states at this time he does not have any additional evidence in support of his...