RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01350
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her condition of Factor V Leiden Blood Clotting Disorder and the
damage she received from thrombus to her right jugular vein be
reevaluated and categorized as Existed Prior to Service (EPTS)-
Service Aggravated.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She believes her line of duty (LOD) determination was not taken
seriously because she was a Reservist that was getting ready to
retire. Her LOD consideration was to include damage from
thrombus which occurred to her right jugular vein. She now has
Post Phlebotic Syndrome because the vein was stretched out. Her
original blood clot was from a mutation called Factor V Leiden,
but her condition worsened by the size of the clot, which caused
her vein to be enlarged. This has caused constant pain that is
not getting any better. She would like her LOD to follow normal
procedures and be looked at seriously.
In support of her appeal, the applicant provides copies of the
Informal LOD Determinations; extended active duty orders; DD Form
214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty;
civilian and military medical records; electronic communications;
and a personal memorandum.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a former member of the Air Force Reserve (AFRES)
who retired in the grade of master sergeant (E-7). According to
the Informal LOD Determinations, dated 1 June 2010 and 14 June
2010, the applicants condition of Factor V Leiden Mutation was
found to be EPTS-LOD not applicable due to the fact the
applicants condition was genetic and clearly pre-existed prior
to service. Therefore, the LOD consideration was cancelled.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/SGP recommends denial. SGP states that an Informal LOD was
cancelled by the Readiness Management Group (RMG) on 30 June
2010. There was no evidence provided indicating the applicants
genetic and clearly pre-existing condition was permanently
worsened beyond natural progression as a result of her military
duties. A formal review by the Headquarters Air Force Reserve
Command LOD Board medical and legal officers was never
accomplished due to this case being cancelled.
The complete SGP evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
She understands that Factor V Leiden Blood Clotting Disorder is
hereditary, but the LOD should be about the damage the blood clot
caused, not because of the Factor V Leiden Blood Clotting
Disorder. She is at high risk for blood clots and is now
currently taking 12 milligrams of Warfarin daily to keep her
blood running thin and to prevent another mishap like the one
that happened while she was on active duty.
The applicants complete rebuttal is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
BCMR MEDICAL CONSULTANTS EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends granting the applicant
relief in the form of assigning a finding of in-the-line-of-duty
(ILOD) for her secondary condition of Post-Phlebitic Syndrome and
venous insufficiency of the right internal jugular vein. The
BCMR Medical Consultant acknowledges that the applicants Factor
V Leiden mutation is genetic in origin which, by definition, is
considered to have existed prior to service. However, with
respect to the applicants claimed diagnosis of Post-Phlebitic
[or Phlebotic] Syndrome, the BCMR Medical Consultant opines that,
but not for the venipuncture that resulted in thrombophlebitis in
the right upper extremity (site of attempted blood collection),
the applicant may not have developed the internal jugular vein
thrombosis; given there was no direct precipitating trauma to her
internal jugular or subclavian veins, as may occur with central
vein catheterization, infection, or an indwelling venous line.
Additionally, the fact the applicant was pregnant with twin
gestations introduced an additional factor contributing to her
hypercoagulable state. Thus, while the applicants Factor V
Leiden mutation is clearly EPTS her newly diagnosed
thrombophlebitis, which initially involved only the right upper
extremity, but which has been implicated in the clot development
within her right internal jugular vein, should be considered a de
novo service-incurred event with the resultant sequalae of
residual Post-Phlebitic Syndrome with venous insufficiency, as
demonstrated on duplex ultrasound.
The complete BCMR Medical Consultants evaluation, with
attachment, is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF BCMR MEDICAL CONSULTANTS EVALUATION:
She agrees with the BCMR Medical Consultants findings and
recommendation.
The applicants complete response to the BCMR Medical
Consultants evaluation is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After
considering the totality of the evidence before us, the Board
agrees with the opinion by the BCMR Medical Consultant that
although the applicants condition of Factor V Leiden Blood
Clotting Disorder is a genetic disorder and existed prior to
service, her secondary condition of Post-Phlebitic Syndrome and
venous insufficiency was more than likely caused by a
venipucture that resulted in thrombophlebitis of the right
jugular vein and should be considered service-incurred.
Therefore, in the interest of equity and justice, we recommend
the applicants records be corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 30 June 2010
her condition of Post-Phlebitic Syndrome and venous insufficiency
of the right internal jugular vein was found to be service-
connected and in the line of duty.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 9 February 2011, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-
01350 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dtd 29 Mar 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFRC/SG, dtd 13 Sep 11.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dtd 28 Oct 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dtd 7 Nov 11.
Exhibit E. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dtd 24 Jan 12,
w/atch.
Exhibit F. Email, Applicant, dtd 26 Jan 12.
Panel Chair
7
4
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01024
The conditions of history of deep vein thrombosis of the right and left lower extremities with post-phlebetic syndrome and chronic venous insufficiency as requested for consideration are the residuals that, IAW with the VASRD, should be used to rate the unfitting condition of heterozygous factor V Leiden deficiency and therefore they meet the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview; and are addressed below, as part of the review of the rating for the unfitting condition. ...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00559
There were no trophic skin changes or evidence of stasis dermatitis.” Diagnosis was “Postphlebitic syndrome, left lower extremity.” The VA (near entry into TDRL) used essentially the same exams and history as the military and rated the CI’s DVT-related conditions as 7121 (Left Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis) at 10%, and 6817 (Bilateral Base Pulmonary Emboli Secondary to Deep Venous Thrombosis) at 60%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00863
I then went before the formal board and received 10% with a disability code of 7121 which allows up to 30% disability rating which would have allowed me to retire.” In block 14 of the DD Form 294 he notes: “The following is the VA decision on disability: I was rated at 60% disabled with the following determinations: Right Kidney Cortical Atrophy with Compensatory Left Kidney Hypertrophy with Residual Thinning & Scarring, Aortic Valve Insufficiency with Regurgitation, Mitral Valve...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02239
The initial VA C&P examination (within the DES Pilot process occurred)dated3 June 2009, during the examination, the examiner noted that the CI was not currently in psychiatric treatment and during brief treatment for his MH symptoms in 2008 he was not hospitalized, was not suicidal and had not required any psychotropic medications.At the VA C&P examination the CI denied being anxious or depressedand the examiner noted the CI was “without signs of ongoing anxiety, depression, or psychosis at...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01048
Recurrent episodes of increased chest pain prompted evaluation for suspected recurrent pulmonary embolism in March 2000 and again in May 2001; however, pulmonary angiogram performed each time was negative for evidence of acute pulmonary embolism, chronic pulmonary embolism, or chronic pulmonary vascular disease. The evidence clearly establishes that, after the second pulmonary embolism in September 1999, the CI did not have recurrent or chronic pulmonary thromboembolism as specified in the...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01176
Repeat examination on 27 June 2004 also recorded that there was no edema of the lower extremities. On examination, the left calf and both thighs were tender to touch, and several distended veins were felt on the left lower calf and right upper thigh.A Coumadin Clinic encounter on 9 December 2005, recorded the CI experienced muscle pain when he overdid activities such as standing too long or playing basketball. The CI complained of edema of the lower extremities relieved with elevation on...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01365
Subsequently after two TDRL periodic exams, the PEB determined the CI’s left lower leg DVT to be stable and unfitting and at this time also determined the CI’s condition to be “post phlebitic syndrome” rated 10%. CI CONTENTION : “Per the findings of my Physical Evaluation Board Proceeding dated 17 Nov 2002, my combined disability rating was rated at 40% category I unfitting conditions. Both the PEBand the VA used the same code:7121, with the PEB rating the condition 10%and the VA rating it...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00114
Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records (BCMR). The service treatment record documented no thrombosis problems following the start of anticoagulant therapy in July 2001 through the MEB exam; and the MEB and C&P examiners reported no objective findings related to abnormal clotting or bleeding, or of any daily functional...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00560
The Board concluded that the evidence of the record did not support rating using the code for pulmonary vascular disease as there were no duty limiting respiratory symptoms and no evidence of chronic or recurrent pulmonary embolism. The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00125
It has also been found that the ICD-9 codes were misdiagnosis; May-Thurner Syndrome (45181): Compress iliac vein; Left Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis (4539): Blood clot. The Board first considered the TDRL entry rating and notes that the FPEB IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E rating increased the 40% rating during the period of TDRL solely due to the recency of the DVT. The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not...