RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01333
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
25.5 days of leave be restored and she receive payment for those
days.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
During the period of 5 Dec 2009 through 26 Apr 2011, she was on
convalescence leave to recover from a periacetabular osteotomy
hip reconstructive surgery. She was immobile for 4 months, in a
wheelchair for 12 months and a walker for the remaining time.
She also required intense physical therapy.
Her doctor placed her on convalescence leave through the start
date of her terminal leave. During this period she was unable
to take time off for leisure time.
In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of her
AF IMTs 988, Leave Request/Authorization; leave transaction
documents and a memorandum from the commandant of the
Noncommissioned Officer Academy.
Her complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to Special Order number ACD-01975, dated 21 Apr 2011,
the applicant retired in the grade of master sergeant (MSgt, E-
7), from the Regular Air Force by reason of Permanent
Disability, with a disability compensable percentage of
30 percent.
Her retirement was effective 28 Jul 2011. She served a total of
20 years, 7 months and 21 days.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application,
extracted from the applicant's available military records, are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR).
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states in accordance
with AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, states in part a
member's application must clearly establish that an error or
injustice by the Air Force caused the member's lost leave.
Additionally, AFI 36-3003, para 10.9.3, states, in part that
hospitalizations, aero-evacuations, quarters, and convalescent
leaves are not authorized means for leave restoration.
The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 11 May 2012, for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has not received a
response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 4 Oct 2012, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-01333:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Apr 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 24 Apr 2012.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 May 2012.
Panel Chair
2
2
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01730
She was profiled [sic] from taking leave while undergoing the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) processes. DPSIM states that IAW AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, a members application must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the members lost leave. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04402
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04402 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 32 days of advance leave she was charged while on leave in in Shreveport, LA be restored. The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04876
Then, she was on convalescent leave and in rehabilitation until 17 Sep 11, and not permitted to leave the local area due to her medical condition. The applicant lost 16 days of leave because her extensive convalescent leave and rehabilitation precluded her from taking ordinary leave. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01302
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01302 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 27 days of leave she lost at the end of fiscal year (FY) 2011 be restored. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was unable to use 27 days of leave due to her being deployed in support of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03927
DPSIM recommends relief for 6 days only as the 45 days the applicant requests has already been reinstated. The additional DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant submitted copies of her Leave and Earnings Statement showing her leave balance was 63 days. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01775
According to the information provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility the applicant carried forward 63.5 days of leave at the beginning of FY 2010. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit C....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00449
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00449 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Thirty days of lost leave be reinstated. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01886
According to the applicants Master Military Pay Account statement dated 12 Dec 2012, he lost 15 days of leave in FY12. Requests must clearly establish that an error or injustice caused by the Air Force prevented the member from using the lost leave. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Feb 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01298
During this time the applicant was forced to use 51 days of leave. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that fifty-one (51) days of leave were restored to his account commencing 2 October 2012. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 July 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00868
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice that warrants restoring 2.5 days of leave to the applicants records. If, at any time, the leave balance drops to or goes below 60 days (75 days during the period 1 Oct 08 to 30 Sep 15), then...