RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01301 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her name be changed in her military personnel records to reflect XXXXXXXXXX. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her name is backwards on the Defense Finance and Accounting Service Form 1099R, Tax Statement. Her name is listed as XXXXXXXXXX instead of XXXXXXXXXX. X In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and her 2009 and 2010 Form 1099R, Tax Statements. Her complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was released from active duty on 30 Nov 92 and retired effective 1 Dec 92. She was credited with serving 20 years, and 24 days. The applicant’s DD Form 214, reflects the name XXXXXXXXXX. On 21 Apr 11, AFPC/DPSIR sent a letter to the applicant requesting the original or a certified copy of her divorce decree in order to change her name. The applicant failed to provide the necessary documents. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIR recommends denial. DPSIR states the applicant did not provide the proper documentation required to change a name. Chapter 5 of Air Force Instruction 36-2608, Military Personnel Records Systems, makes clear the documentation required to change or correct a name is a birth, baptismal, marriage, or naturalization certificate, civil court order, or other legal document. The complete DPSIR evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 4 Nov 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. However, it appears the applicant is seeking to correct her name on a DFAS form and we recommend her contact that office for relief. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-01301 in Executive Session on 4 Jan 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Apr 11, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIR, dated 17 Oct 11. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Nov 11. Panel Chair