AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00383
He was progressively promoted to the grade of senior master sergeant with an effective date and date of rank of 1 Jul 69. After a thorough review of the deceased military member’s military records they were unable to find evidence of a recommendation for, or award of the DSM. Complete copies of the evaluations are at Exhibit C and F. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The deceased military member’s son reiterated...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00384
INDEX CODE: 137.04 AFBCMR BC-2006-00384 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00385
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00385 INDEX CODE: 102.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 AUG 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her corrected Reserve appointment date of 1 Apr 87 be changed to 6 Apr 93. She was appointed as a Reserve of the Air Force in the grade of captain with a promotion service date...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00388
INDEX CODE: 135.02 BC-2006-00388 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00390
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: JPPSO-SAT/ECAF recommends denial. The JPPSO evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00393
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He did not receive recognition for combat while serving in Vietnam. After a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the available evidence of record, the Board was not persuaded that he should be awarded the Combat Recognition Ribbon. The Board notes to be eligible for the CRR, members must have engaged in combat after 18 September 2001.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00395
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00395 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 AUGUST 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM) for Foreign Service to Korea be reflected on his DD Form 214. The applicant's report on individual personnel records review...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00395A
The applicant's report on individual personnel records review printout dated 1 September 1984, verify and confirm the following dates of temporary duty (TDY) in Korea (see Exhibit B): September 1981 TDY to Korea 22 days August 1983 TDY to Korea 24 days February 1982 TDY to Germany 20 days On 18 April 2006, the Board considered and denied an application for correction of military records pertaining to applicant. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00396
He was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant while a POW, and should have been promoted to captain upon his release. Applicant has not provided any evidence that he was recommended for promotion to captain. Additionally, without the applicant’s record, they cannot determine whether he should have been promoted under any other provisions in policy or law HQ AFPC/DPPPO’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00397
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records; the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, nor did he provide any facts warranting a change to his character of service. We...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00402
The reason for this is: 1) to advise the ratee of the senior rater’s promotion recommendation and 2) to provide the ratee an opportunity to point out any errors of fact to the senior rater so they may be corrected prior to the CSB. The applicant has failed to provide supporting documents of a material error in the report. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice regarding the applicant’s request for consideration for promotion by...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00405
In accordance with AFI 36-2502, Airman Promotion Program, Table 2.1, Rule 2, dated 6 August 2002, a member must possess a PAFSC at the 5-skill level by the respective Promotion Eligibility Cutoff Date (PECD) for the cycle. They have no way of knowing whether the applicant’s commander would have approved a skill level waiver for cycle 02E5, especially since he had only been on active duty 52 days as of the PECD. He did not possess the skill level required, nor did he receive a skill...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00407
After considering all the matters presented, his commander determined that he committed the offenses alleged. She states that despite the fact the property was found in the residence of SSgt R---, the elements of the Article 121 offense of wrongful appropriation are met if the property appropriated was for “his own use or the use of any other person other than the owner.” The SJA cites the legal review for the applicant’s NJP appeal, which apparently states that, “He permitted a coworker to...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00412
On 3 Mar 06, AFPC/DPAPP notified the applicant that they were unable to find any documents in his military personnel records that show he was TDY at any time during his tour of duty in the Air Force. DPAPP asked the applicant to make a through search of his personal files to see if he had any documentation that would verify his claim, i.e., copies of Travel Vouchers, TDY Orders, or Flight Records that show a specific time and location of the TDY. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00413
DPPRS states based upon the documentation in the master personnel records the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge process; nor did he provide any facts warranting a change to his character of service or his RE code. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00416
DPPRS affirms the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, and did not provide any facts warranting a change to his reenlistment eligibility code. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00417
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00417 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 AUGUST 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation program designator (SPD) and reenlistment eligibility (RE) codes be changed to permit re-entry into the military (Army). Examiner’s Note: On 16 May 06, AFPC/DPPRSP...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00419
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00419 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 AUG 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, dated 8 August 2005, be removed from her records and her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00420
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial noting the HSM was awarded and approved for three Flood Relief Operations in West Virginia and Virginia. After a thorough review of the applicant’s records, AFPC/DPPPR indicated they were unable to find evidence the applicant participated in the approved operations. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00423
INDEX CODE: 107.00 AFBCMR BC-2006-00423 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00424
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 19 Apr 74, in the grade of airman basic (E-1), for a period of six years. Punishment imposed was a reduction in grade to airman (E-2) and forfeiture of $100 for one month; (10) O/a 3 and 4 Apr 78, applicant received an Article 15 for failure to go to his prescribed place of duty on time. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00425
_________________________________________________________________ SAF/MRB LEGAL REVIEW: Subsequent to the Board’s request, the SAF/MRB Legal Advisor provided a review of this appeal. In regard to the applicant’s request to restore his lost time, we note the SAF/MRB Legal Advisor indicates the AFPC/DPF advisory opinion is incorrect in stating that an AF Form 2098 should have been processed reversing the “bad” time computation, and the failure to do so was an error. His commander did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00427
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant’s request for upgrade of discharge to honorable and change of reenlistment eligibility code on 16 October 1975 (Exhibit B). On 9 February 1978, the Air Force Discharge Review Board again considered all the evidence of record and concluded that the applicant should receive an honorable discharge. He was successfully treated for this alcoholism while hospitalized at the Kingsbridge VA Hospital in Bronx, New York from 8 August 1976...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00432
The discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority, the applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, nor did he provide any facts warranting a change to her character of service. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Mar...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-004334
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00434 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 JUL 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority, the applicant did not submit any...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00434
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00434 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 JUL 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Therefore, based on the evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00440
INDEX CODE: 125.00 BC-2006-00440 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00447
They further state the Air Force requires more from their officers when dealing with professionalism, military bearing and maturity. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00448
While current Air Force policy requires performance feedback for personnel, a direct correlation between information provided during feedback sessions and the assessments on evaluation reports does not necessarily exist. Evaluators must confirm they did not provide counseling or feedback, and that this directly resulted in an unfair evaluation. AFPC/DPPPEP's complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00449
DPPPR states the NPRC was able to reconstruct a part of his military record; however, the complete record which may contain the documentation needed for the aforementioned awards was not found. Although the applicant’s entitlement to the requested awards could not be verified though his official records, the Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed documentation provided by the applicant, including a citation for the Distinguished Flying Cross and information taken from the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00453
They requested he provide a copy of the special order awarding the AFCM. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states he has the original copy of the citation with the raised seal and official certificate, however, he finds it hard to believe that somewhere there is not a copy of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00454
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS reviewed this application and indicated that there was no documentation in applicant’s master personnel records relating to the reason for discharge or the discharge process. We find no evidence of error in this case and after...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00456
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request for award of the PH be denied. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or an injustice. The applicant stated he received...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00457
One previous conviction was considered in this case. He was credited with 2 years, 4 months, and 3 days of active military service (excludes 151 days lost time due to confinement). The discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00463
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00463 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 AUGUST 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00466
INDEX CODE: 121.02 BC-2006-00466 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00467
She states she did not learn about the benefits of the MGIB program until she was in discussion with other military members after separating from the military. In an effort to provide the applicant an opportunity to present an incontrovertible case supporting her request, she was asked to provide supplementary documentation from witnesses who could corroborate the error or injustice causing her decision to disenroll from the MGIB. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Gregory A. Parker, Member Ms. Jan...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00468
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. However, after reviewing the evidence of record and the Air Force assessment of this case, it is our opinion that the narrative reason and RE code improperly label the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00475
INDEX CODE: 137.03 AFBCMR BC-2006-00475 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00477
He was considered and not selected for promotion by the CY04C Col Board that convened on 6 December 2004. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00480
AFBCMR BC-2006-00480 INDEX CODE: 107.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00482
Members of the Board, Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Ms. Josephine L. Davis, and Mr. James A. Wolffe, considered this application on 9 March 2006. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFRC/SG, dtd 21 Feb 06, w/atchs AFBCMR BC-2006-00482 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00487
To be awarded the BSM, a member while serving in any capacity with the Armed Forces of the United States on or after 7 December 1941, shall have distinguished himself by heroic or meritorious achievement or service. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPF states AFI 36-2903, Dress and Personal Appearance of Air Force Personnel, outlines the wear of sister-Service badges, insignias and patches and does not authorize permanent wear of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00488
He wants his Air Force and DVA records to reflect the change and CRSC compensation. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 18 Jun 06 (Exhibit D) for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00489
The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 Jun 06 (Exhibit D) for review and comment within 30 days. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00490
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00490 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: TERESA MOSCOVICH, VA HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 19 JUNE 2007 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Combat Recognition Award for his service in Vietnam. DPPPR states they were unable to verify his entitlement to the Combat Recognition Award (Combat Readiness...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00492
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00492 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 Sep 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by special selection board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 1999A (CY99A) Lieutenant Colonel Central...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00494
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 5 December 1984 and entered active duty. The Office of the Secretary of the Air Force, Personnel Council (SAF/PC), subsequently directed the applicant be permanently retired for physical disability. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00496
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPF recommends denial because the applicant was not representing the Air Force in a DOD-sanctioned event or role. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 31 Mar 06 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). Had there been sufficient time for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00499
At this time, she is functioning normally and there are no indications of any problems from the original diagnosis of polycystic kidney disease and kidney stones. Although she is reported to have normal kidney function with stable blood pressure, and no recent kidney stones, her condition remains disqualifying for service in accordance with medical standards for enlistment and reenlistment in Air Force Instruction 48-123, Attachment 3 (paragraph A3.18.6.3, Cystic or polycystic kidney,...