RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00417
INDEX CODE: 100.06
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 AUGUST 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His separation program designator (SPD) and reenlistment eligibility (RE)
codes be changed to permit re-entry into the military (Army).
Examiner’s Note: On 16 May 06, AFPC/DPPRSP administratively corrected
applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty to change his narrative reason for separation, from
“Miscellaneous/General Reasons” to “Completion of Required Active Service.”
This action was taken based on the fact that applicant was serving on a
suspended punishment pursuant to an Article 15 at the time he was separated
with a reenlistment eligibility code of “4H.”
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His separation code and reentry code should be updated to normal conditions
since the suspension has been released. He would like the codes changed so
that he can join the Army.
In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form
214, and AF Form 3070, Record of Nonjudicial Punishment Proceedings.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 22 Sep 99, in the grade of
airman basic, for a period of six years.
On 13 Apr 04, applicant received an Article 15 for striking another airman
by shoving him on the shoulders with his hands on or about 14 Feb 04;
punishment imposed consisted of a suspended reduction to the grade of
airman, suspended forfeiture of $500.00 pay per month for two months, 30
days extra duty and a reprimand.
On 15 Sep 04, applicant was honorably discharged from active duty in the
grade of senior airman, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, with
separation program designator code (SPD) of “KND” (Miscellaneous/General
Reasons). He was issued an RE Code of 4H, “Serving suspended punishment
pursuant to Article 15.” He served 4 years, 11 months, and 24 days of
active military service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial of the applicant’s request. They note that
the applicant’s separation was consistent with the procedural requirements
of the discharge regulation. The discharge was within the discretion of
the separation authority.
The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or
injustices that occurred in the separation processing. Additionally, the
SPD and RE codes are correct and no corrective action is required.
The applicant was separated under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 and the
FY04 Force Shaping Program (DOS Rollback Program).
According to Military Personnel Flight Memorandum (MPFM) 04-35, commanders
were allowed to accelerate the dates of separation (DOS) on Airmen with
specific reenlistment eligibility codes based on the criteria of the DOS
Rollback Program. Specifically, Airmen in all Air Force Specialty Codes
with a reenlistment eligibility code of “4H” (serving suspended punishment
pursuant to Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice) would have their
DOS established as 15 Sep 04.
Airmen separated under the DOS Rollback Program with a reenlistment
eligibility code of “4H” were separated with Separation Program Designator
(SPD) of “JBK” (if member had served less than 6 years of active service).
Applicant had served on active duty for a period of 4 years, 11 months and
24 days.
The AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 9 Jun 06, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this
office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After reviewing the applicant’s records
and noting his contentions, the Board is of the opinion, although the
action and disposition in the applicant’s case were proper, the narrative
reason for separation and his RE code should be changed in order to provide
him another opportunity to serve in the military. His current RE code does
not allow him to pursue his desire to continue his military career.
Therefore, in view of his overall service, the Board recommends his records
be corrected as indicated below. Whether or not he is successful in
rejoining the military will depend on the needs of the respective military
service at the time and their recommendation in no way guarantees he will
be allowed to serve in the military again; this will simply afford him the
opportunity to apply for a waiver to enlist in the armed services.
Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected to the extent indicated
below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 15 September 2004 he was
separated under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1.2 (Secretarial
Authority) with a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3K and a separation
code of JFF.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2006-
00417 in Executive Session on 25 July 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. James W. Russell III, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
Mr. Elwood C. Lewis III, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Feb 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 19 May 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Jun 06.
JAMES W. RUSSELL, III
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2006-00417
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to [APPLICANT] be corrected to show that on 15 September 2004 he
was separated under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1.2
(Secretarial Authority) with a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3K
and a separation code of JFF.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01079
He believes there is no reason he should not be allowed to reenlist into another service component. DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 27 April 2007 for review and comment within 30 days. JAMES W. RUSSELL, III Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC [pic] Office Of The Assistant...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01938
Specifically, he was serving on a suspended punishment pursuant to an Article 15 at the time of his separation. In accordance with Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3208, “Airmen separating with RE code 4H or 4I will be separated with SPD code JBK.” He was serving on a suspended punishment pursuant to an Article 15 at the time of his separation thereby validating the SPD and RE code he received. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00599
The discharge authority approved the separation and directed the applicant be discharged with an honorable discharge without probation and rehabilitation. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. He provided...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00468
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. However, after reviewing the evidence of record and the Air Force assessment of this case, it is our opinion that the narrative reason and RE code improperly label the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01106
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied, and states, in part, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, the Board is of the opinion there was no deliberate deception on the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00835
On 31 May 11, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation Of Airmen, with a narrative reason of completion of required active service, a corresponding SPD code of JBK, and an RE code of 2X. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, stating, in part, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the narrative...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02095A
__________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Pursuant to the Board’s request, AFPC/DPPRS provided an information only evaluation of the applicant’s request for reconsideration of her case. AFPC/JA notes that this individual fell under the Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program. __________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 7 June 2006,...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00752
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an Article 15 and while he was on leave his commander received a notice to separate airmen with bad records under the Force Shaping program. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA states the applicant was not serving suspended punishment under Article 15, UCMJ at the time of his release. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02654
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends changing the applicants RE code to 3K, due to the RE code 4H being erroneous. The applicant is requesting his RE code and SPD code be changed to allow him to reenlist in military service. However, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02705
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02705 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 10 Jun 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 4H (Serving suspended punishment pursuant to Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) be changed so that he may enlist in the Air...