RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00448
INDEX CODE: 111.05
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 AUGUST 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 16 August
2004 through 23 January 2005, be declared void and removed from his
records.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He received no disciplinary action of any sort to justify the ratings
rendered. He was never provided feedback of any substandard duty
performance. No derogatory information of any kind can be found in his
Personnel Information File (PIF) to justify these ratings. On-the-job-
training (OJT) records were never updated to reflect training in the areas
that he has been downgraded.
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, a copy
of the EPR and feedback statement, letters of support from the additional
rater and co-workers, copy of his training record.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of
technical sergeant.
On 11 July 05 and 30 January 2006, the applicant filed an appeal under the
provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation
Reports. The ERAB denied the applicant's request.
The following is a resume of the applicant's recent EPR profile.
PERIOD ENDING OVERALL EVALUATION
02 Aug 05 5
23 Jan 05* 3
15 Aug 04 5
19 Dec 03 4
31 Mar 03 5
31 Mar 02 5
* - Contested report
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPEP reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. The
applicant is requesting the report be removed in accordance with AFI 36-
2401, para A1.5.8, lack of counseling or feedback. This paragraph reads as
follows, "Only members in the rating chain can confirm if counseling was
provided. While current Air Force policy requires performance feedback for
personnel, a direct correlation between information provided during
feedback sessions and the assessments on evaluation reports does not
necessarily exist. For example, if after a positive feedback session, an
evaluator discovers serious problems, he or she must record the problems in
the evaluation report even when it disagrees with the previous feedback.
There may be occasions when feedback was not provided during a reporting
period. Lack of counseling or feedback, by itself, is not sufficient to
challenge the accuracy or justness of a report. Evaluators must confirm
they did not provide counseling or feedback, and that this directly
resulted in an unfair evaluation. The applicant must supply specific
information about the unfair evaluation so the Board can make a reasoned
judgment on the appeal. Finally, every airman knows the existing standards
for indebtedness, weight, fitness, etc. Lack of counseling in these areas
provides no valid basis for voiding a report." In addition, AFI 36-2406,
para 2.10 states, "While documented feedback sessions are required, they do
not replace informal day-to-day feedback. A reader's failure to conduct a
required or requested feedback session, or document the session on a PFW,
will not, of itself, invalidate any subsequent performance report or PRF."
AFPC/DPPPEP's complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28
April 2006 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this
office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice warranting voidance of the EPR closing 23
January 2005 and removal from his records. In this respect, after a
thorough review of the evidence of record, we believe reasonable doubt has
been established as to whether or not the performance report closing
23 January 2005, is a true and accurate assessment of his performance
during the period in question. Based on the evidence provided, in
particular the statement from the additional rater, it appears that a lack
of communication may have existed between the applicant and his rater that
hindered that individual's ability to objectively assess the applicant's
performance. In consideration of all the circumstances involved it is our
opinion that the benefit of any doubt in this matter should be resolved in
the applicant’s favor. Accordingly, we recommend that his records be
corrected to the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Enlisted Performance Report, AF
Form 910, rendered for the period 16 August 2004 to 23 January 2005,
be declared void and removed from his records.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006-00448
in Executive Session on 22 June 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
Ms. Glenda H. Scheiner, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Nov 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPPPEP, dated 14 Apr 06.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Apr 06.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AFBCMR BC-2006-00448
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXX II, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that the Enlisted
Performance Report, AF Form 910, rendered for the period 16 August 2004
through 23 January 2005, be, and hereby is, declared void and removed from
his records.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03399
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-03399 INDEX CODE: 111.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) closing 8 Sep 06 be voided and removed from his record. HQ AFPC/DPPPEP’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01081
DPPPEP states the applicant filed two appeals under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Reports. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 May 05. CHRISTOPHER D. CAREY Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-01081 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01175
On 23 August 2004, she was provided a copy of her 1 July 2004 EPR from the military personnel flight (MPF). AFPC/DPPPEP complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 June 2005, for review and response within 30 days. We are not convinced by the evidence she provided in support of her appeal, that the contested...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02059
The applicant filed an appeal under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 18 Aug 06 for review and comment within 30 days. MARILYN M. THOMAS Vice Chair AFBCMR BC-2006-03059 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01402
AFPC/DPPPEP's complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 June 2006 for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the...
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Enlisted Performance Report, AF Form 910, rendered for the period 24 July 1997 through 11 December 1998, be declared void and removed from her records. ROSCOE HINTON JR. Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-01041 MEMORANDUM...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01716
In support of her request, the applicant provided a personal statement, copy of statement Reason for Appeal of Referral EPR, AF IMT Form 910 Enlisted Performance Report, a Rebuttal to Referral Report Memorandum, a Letter of Appreciation, AF Form IMT 931, Performance Feedback Worksheet, five Letters of Recommendation and excerpts from her military personnel records. On 3 October 2005, an unsigned copy of the referral EPR dated 30 September 2005 was presented to her. After reviewing the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03017
On 17 April 2001, the applicant filed an AF Form 1168 (Statement of Suspect/Witness/Complaint) contending that his signature was forged on a notification feedback letter for the EPR closing 5 March 2001. The validity of the document the applicant alleges to have been forged cannot be verified and the applicant has not provided any evidence to substantiate the report was not an accurate of assessment of his performance during the rating period. After reviewing the available evidence, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02414
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02414 INDEX CODE: 111.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 FEB 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His enlisted performance report closing 13 Sep 05 be voided. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPEP reviewed...
Except for the contested report and a 2 Dec 91 EPR having an overall rating of “4,” all of the applicant’s performance reports since Dec 90 have had overall ratings of “5.” Since the Article 15’s suspended reduction expired on 12 Aug 96, prior to the 31 Dec 96 Promotion Eligibility Cutoff Date (PECD) for promotion cycle 97E6, the Article 15 did not affect the applicant’s eligibility for promotion consideration to technical sergeant for that cycle. ...