AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00796
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00796 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 Sep 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that allows reenlistment. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00801
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00801 INDEX CODES: 111.02, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 Sep 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 9 Apr 02 through 14 Feb 03 be declared void and removed from his records, and the attached reaccomplished OPR be accepted...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00803
DPPAE states that when the Air Staff reduced the reenlistment window from 12 to 3 months and deleted the SRB in his career field, the applicant was not eligible to reenlist. Evidence indicates that the applicant was not eligible to reenlist on or before the date the Air Force reduced the reenlistment window from 12 months to 3 months on 5 March 2004 because his 12-month prior-to-ETS date was 13 March 2004. _________________________________________________________________ The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00804
Nevertheless, the applicant has provided a notarized statement alleging she did not receive the notification letter. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00805
INDEX CODE: 121.03 AFBCMR BC-2005-00805 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00806
INDEX CODE: 121.03 AFBCMR BC-2005-00806 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00814
On 15 March 2002, applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending discharge from the Air Force for fraudulent entry. The base legal office reviewed the case file and found it legally sufficient to support the discharge and recommended applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized entry-level separation. The applicant’s RE code had its basis in his involuntary discharge for fraudulent entry into the service.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00815
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00815 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 10 SEP 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal for a combat injury received while stationed in Da Nang Vietnam from 7 Feb 69 to 7 Feb 70. Applicant’s complete submission...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00818
Members of the Board, Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Mr. Wallace F. Beard Jr., and Ms. Martha A. Maust, considered this application on 15 June 2005. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 19 May 05, w/atch AFBCMR BC-2005-00818 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00819
His Officer Promotion Brief (OPB) be updated to reflect the “C” prefix for his Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC), the Armed Force Reserve Medal (AFRM) and his overseas duty be reflected in his overseas history on the OPB. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states a corrected version of his MSM for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00821
Further, since the Article 15 was the sole reason for his discharge and the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) has upgraded his discharge to honorable, the reason for his discharge and RE code should also be changed. The applicant has not provided any evidence showing that the imposing commanders or the reviewing authority abused their discretionary authority, that his substantial rights were violated during the processing of the Article 15 punishments, or that the punishments...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00823
DPP states the applicant’s records indicate he completed 26 years, 3 months, and 6 days of honorable Federal service as of his discharge from the Air Force Reserve; however, only 18 years, 4 months, and 9 days of this time was satisfactory service creditable toward retirement pay eligibility. Since the applicant was discharged from the Air Force Reserve prior to the enactment of this provision of law, he is not eligible for RTAP pay or Reserve Retired pay. The evidence provided confirms...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00826
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00826 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 Sep 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion by special selection board (SSB) for the CY04B Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board with the Officer Performance Report (OPR)...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00827
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00827 INDEX CODE: 112.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 Sep 06 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to participate in the Enlisted College Loan Repayment Program (ECLRP). The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00828
AFBCMR BC-2005-00828 INDEX CODE: 121.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00829
His request claims his progress since returning to active duty has not only benefited him, “but has also benefited the Air Force as well.” The applicant’s specific request is that he be immediately promoted to E-4, skipping the time and performance requirements for promotion to E-2, to E-3 and to E-4. He was promoted to the grade of airman (E-2) with a date of rank of 6 November 2004, and an effective date of 17 June 2004. b. He was promoted to the grade of airman (E-2) with a date of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00830
Applicant states he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received on 9 December 1964. However, the documentation in the record reflects the Purple Heart was awarded for wounds received 9 December 1967. Novel, Panel Chair Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member Mr. Vance E. Lineberger, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Mar 05, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00832
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00832 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Sep 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Selection Brief (OSB) prepared for consideration by the Calendar Year 2003A (CY03A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board be amended to reflect his master’s degree, and he...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00833
Although the applicant requested FRV insurance on her HHG shipment and took all the necessary steps to get it, JACC recommends no additional payment be made on her claim. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00834
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). In this respect, we are in agreement with the opinion and recommendation of the appropriate Air Force office, AFLSA/JACC, that the evidence supports awarding the recommended amount of $807.49 by the Traffic Management Office rather than the applicant’s requested amount of $1,138.84. FREDERICK R. BEAMAN III Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-00834 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00835
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement and six character reference letters. However, documentation provided by the applicant in support of his appeal is over 13 years old. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00836
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request be denied, and states, in part, the applicant was deployed in support of ONW and OEF, while assigned to Incirlik Air Base, Turkey, from December 2000 to March 2002. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit F. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Under the heading...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00838
He was found guilty by his commander who imposed the following punishment: reduction in grade from airman first class to airman and ordered to forfeit $100.00 per month for two months, but the execution of the portion of the punishment which provided for reduction to airman was suspended until 1 August 1974, at which time, unless the suspension was sooner vacated, it would be remitted without further action. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00842
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00842 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 AUGUST 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. He received a Letter of Reprimand for this misconduct. On 23 March 2004, the Air Force Discharge Review...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00843
As a result of missing medical records she was not able to complete her enlistment with the PAANG and begin earning points until 23 January 2004, after the affected R/R year had passed. DPP notes the issue of missing medical records as the cause of her not earning her final point with the PAANG in time is not relevant. DPP’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00846
Members of the Board, Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Ms. Cheryl V. Jacobson, and Ms. Marcia Jean Bachman, considered this application on 12 April 2005. PEGGY E. GORDON Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 16 Mar 05, w/atch AFBCMR BC-2005-00846 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00851
The applicant alleges these evaluation boards would not consider anyone for promotion if they were not an NCO Academy graduate. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response to the Air Force evaluations, the applicant notes that he was eligible for promotion during the senior master sergeant boards held in 1972, 1973, 1974, and 1975. The applicant indicates agreement...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00852
The discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority, the applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, nor did he provide any facts warranting a change to his DD Form 214. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Mar 05, for...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00857
Additionally, while flying several missions over Germany, under extremely cold weather conditions, he received residual cold injuries to his hands and feet (frostbite). After a thorough review of his submission and the supporting documentation he provided, to include the rating assessment from the Veterans Administration, these documents do not persuade us that he should be awarded the Purple Heart Medal. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Terry L. Scott, Member Ms. Cheryl V. Jacobson, Member The...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00861
AFBCMR BC-2005-00861 Index Code: 131.01 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00863
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00863 INDEX CODE: 107.00 xxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NONE xxxxxxxxxxxxx HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 SEP 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show his entitlement to the Air Medal (AM). After a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the available...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00866
He filed a rebuttal of the charges stating his spouse was also a military member and he wanted to combine her weight allowance with his entitlement. The governing regulation stipulates that when a military member is married to another military member, neither can be counted as being a dependent of the other to increase any allowance (including HHG weight). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00867
Members of the Board, Ms. B.J. White-Olson, Ms. Janet I. Hassan, and Mr. Grover L. Dunn, considered this application on 26 April 2005. WHITE-OLSON Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPFF, dtd 12 Apr 05, w/atch AFBCMR BC-2005-00867 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00870
DPPPR’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment on 8 April 2005. We took notice of the applicant’s contention that her late husband should be awarded the KDSM for time served in Korea; however, sufficient evidence has not been presented to substantiate this claim. We thoroughly reviewed the former...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00872
Combining both the Army Reserve and Air Force Reserve service, he received credited with one year of satisfactory Federal service for the period 11 January 1975 to 10 January 1976. A review of the applicant’s military personnel record indicates he completed a total of 23 years, 11 months and 22 days of honorable service as of 2 January 1993, his date of discharge from the Air Force Reserve. However, only 19 years and 11 months of this time is satisfactory service creditable toward retired...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00873
INDEX CODE: 131.05 BC-2005-00873 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00874
INDEX CODE: 131.05 BC-2005-00874 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00875
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR BC-2005-00875 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00890
When he arrived at his new duty station, he tried to cancel his extension but was told he could not do so as his extension paperwork indicated he could only cancel the extension within 30 days after canceling his orders. He had 30 days from the 4 November 2003 date in which to cancel his extension. LAURENCE M. GRONER Panel Chair BC-2005-00890 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00893
INDEX CODE: 135.02 AFBCMR BC-2005-00893 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00905
Therefore, it appears that the appropriate corrective action to be taken in this case would be to partially approve her request by restoring 5 days of leave to her leave account. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that five (5) days of annual leave were added to her leave account commencing 2 October 2004. MARILYN M....
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00906
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00906 INDEX CODE: 123.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 SEP 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 24 days of confinement he served as the result of an Article 15 be removed from his records. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00907
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00907 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 SEPTEMBER 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. He served 1 year, 2 months, and 12 days total active service with 216 days of lost time. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00908
On 14 September 1998, the Secretary of the Air Force approved the IPEB’s recommendation and directed that the applicant’s name be placed on the TDRL. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 8 April 2005, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant for review and response within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00919
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Based on the addition of the Air Force Commendation Medal, First Oak Leaf Cluster (AFCM, 1 OLC), and the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), he would have been selected for promotion to the grade of master sergeant prior to his retirement since he missed promotion by 1 point or so. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. However, based upon the presumption of regularity in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00925
AFBCMR BC-2005-00925 INDEX CODE: 137.04 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00933
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00933 INDEX CODE: 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 Sep 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1985 general discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 6 Nov 85, the commander recommended the applicant be separated with a general discharge for drug abuse. Accordingly, we recommend...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00937
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He desires to reenlist in the service. On 2 June 1998, the applicant was found guilty by his commander who imposed the following punishment: reduction to the grade of airman first class from senior airman, with a new date of rank of 2 June 1998 and 45 days of extra duty. The execution of the punishment which provided for reduction in grade was suspended until December 1998, after which time, it would...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00938
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00938 INDEX CODE: 100.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 Sep 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2Q (personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to a code which will enable his reenlistment into the Air Force. On 12 Jul...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00940
586063TA2, which is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied. The applicant did not provide any facts warranting an upgrade of his discharge, nor did he submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in his discharge processing. Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 22 Jun 05, w/FBI Report Number 586063TA2, dated 9 May 05.