Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00803
Original file (BC-2005-00803.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-00803
                                       INDEX CODE:  128.05
      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX                  COUNSEL: NONE

      XXXXXXXXXXXX                           HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  9 SEP 06

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be allowed to reenlist and obtain  his  Selective  Reenlistment  Bonus
(SRB).

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His reenlistment representative did not provide him  correct  information
regarding his SRB and advised him he was considered a “first term” airman
and that he would need a Career Job Reservation (CJR).   In  March  2004,
the list came out that reenlistment could not be  accomplished  until  90
days out so he decided  to  wait  until  March  2005.   If  there  was  a
possibility he could have reenlisted in  February  2004,  he  could  have
obtained his SRB in March 2004 and would  not  have  waited  until  March
2005.

The applicant provides no documentation in support of  his  appeal.   His
submission is at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the  rank  of  staff
sergeant (E-5) with a date of rank of 1 November 2002.  His Total  Active
Federal Military Service Date is 14 March 1997.   On  3 March  2005,  the
applicant reenlisted for a period of four years.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied.  DPPAE states  that  the
applicant reenlisted on 14 March 2001 for 4 years giving him  a  date  of
separation of 13 March 2005.  Effective  5  March  2004,  the  Air  Force
reduced the reenlistment window from 12 months to 3  months  prior  to  a
member’s expiration term of service (ETS).  The authorized  SRB  for  the
applicant’s career field was deleted when  changes  to  the  SRB  amounts
authorized were made effective 30 April 2004.  DPPAE states that when the
Air Staff reduced the reenlistment window from 12 to 3 months and deleted
the SRB in his career field, the applicant was not eligible to  reenlist.
In order for the applicant to be reenlistment eligible  and  receive  the
SRB, the applicant’s ETS had to be July 2004 or earlier.  The  AFPC/DPPAE
evaluation is at Exhibit B.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 25 March 2005, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant for review and comment.  As  of  this  date,  this  office  has
received no response.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate  the
existence  of  an  error  or  injustice.   Evidence  indicates  that  the
applicant was not eligible to reenlist on or  before  the  date  the  Air
Force reduced the reenlistment window from 12 months to  3  months  on  5
March 2004 because his 12-month  prior-to-ETS  date  was  13 March  2004.
While the applicant believes he has been the victim of an  injustice,  he
has not provided any evidence that  would  lead  us  to  believe  he  was
treated differently from other similarly situated members.  Therefore, we
agree with the opinion and recommendation of  the  Air  Force  office  of
primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as  the  basis  for  our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an  error  or
injustice.   Accordingly,  the  applicant’s  request  is  not   favorably
considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 10 August 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

            Mr. Michael J. Novel, Panel Chair
            Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member
            Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with  AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2005-00803:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 28 Feb 05.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 14 Mar 05.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Mar 05.



                                   MICHAEL J. NOVEL
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03159

    Original file (BC-2004-03159.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to HQ AFPC/DPPAE (Exhibit C), effective 5 Mar 04, the Air Force reduced the reenlistment window from 12 months to three months prior to a member’s ETS. As the Air Force announces SRB changes, affected personnel are given at least 30 days prior to the effective date of the SRB changes to reenlist. Eligibility is based on the policies in effect at the time the member reenlists.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03397

    Original file (BC-2004-03397.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He graduated from technical training school on 7 April 2004, and after inquiring about reenlisting, was informed the rules had changed and he was not eligible to reenlist, because he was not within three months of his date of separation (DOS). His complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E _________________________________________________________________ ADDITONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/JAA reviewed a similar application and provided an advisory which indicates in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03558

    Original file (BC-2004-03558.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was not notified of the change in policy of his SRB, and was miscounseled concerning whether or not he was eligible to reenlist immediately after school. In accordance with the governing instruction, AFI 36-2606, (Reenlistment in the United States Air Force) applicant had to reenlist within 30 days of class graduation date to receive the SRB that was in effect as of the date he was approved for retraining (31 July 2003). Applicant was not eligible to reenlist and receive an SRB...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01939

    Original file (BC-2004-01939.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the first date that the applicant was eligible for reenlistment was 1 May 2004. Evidence supports that even though the applicant was eligible to reenlist upon receiving his 3-skill level in June 2003, it appears his action to delay his reenlistment until March 2004 was solely his own choice. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 15 September 2004, under the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03180

    Original file (BC-2005-03180.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reenlistments section did not allow him to reenlist in the allotted 30- day window after completing retraining and receiving his 3-skill level in accordance with Air Force instructions and reenlistments continuity book. DPPAE explains at the time he graduated from retraining, the applicant had to meet the reenlistment eligibility window requirement of three months prior to expiration of term of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02161

    Original file (BC-2005-02161.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 April 2004 applicant applied for a CJR and was approved on 14 April 2004. DPPAE states effective 29 April 2004, the applicant’s SRB was deleted and she was not eligible to reenlist at that time to receive the SRB due to her not being within 3 months prior to her expiration term of service (ETS). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that the applicant should be given the relief requested.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02994

    Original file (BC-2004-02994.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02994 INDEX NUMBER: 128.05 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for his Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC), 4N051, Aerospace Medical Service Journeyman. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00609

    Original file (BC-2005-00609.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPAE states the applicant is not eligible to receive the SRB that was in effect when he was approved for retraining because he did not reenlist within 30 days of the notice of termination of the SRB for that career field. DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he never received official notification of the requirement to reenlist within 30 days of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01677

    Original file (BC-2005-01677.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board noted that the Air Force Separations Branch was unable to determine the propriety of the separation. Nevertheless, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force Reenlistments office that the applicant’s request should be granted based on the governing directive in effect at the time of his separation. Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2006-00561

    Original file (BC-2006-00561.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 Oct 05, the applicant’s commander notified her via an AF Form 286A, “Notification of Nuclear Weapons Personnel Reliability Program Permanent Decertification/Disqualification Action,” he was concurring with the recommendation of the medical authority to permanently decertify her from the PRP. Air Force Form 418, dated 29 Sep 04, which indicates she was selected for reenlistment just 13 months prior to the AF Form 418 dated 28 Oct 05 denying her reenlistment. After reviewing the...