RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00823
INDEX CODE: 108.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 10 September 2006
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He receive Reserve retired pay at age 60, some type of medical benefits, or
Reserve Transition Assistance Pay (RTAP).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He believes his records are unjust due to the fact he completed almost 18½
years of satisfactory military service creditable towards retired pay
eligibility; was injured in August 1988 while performing his Reserve duty;
and when his unit was disbanded on 10 July 1991, he was honorably
discharged without medical benefits or RTAP. He is still under doctor’s
care for his back condition.
In support of his application, the applicant provided a personal statement.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 1 October 1965, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the
grade of airman third class (E-2) for a period of four years. He was
credited with 5 months and 26 days of satisfactory Federal service of which
4 months and 8 days was active duty from prior military service in the Army
Reserve. On 13 August 1976, the applicant was released from active duty
under the PALACE CHASE program incurring a Ready Reserve obligation service
date of 22 August 1978. On 14 August 1976, the applicant enlisted in the
Air Force Reserve in the rank of staff sergeant (E-4) for a period of two
years and nine days. The applicant continued to participate in the Ready
Reserve by reenlisting, with his last reenlistment establishing an
Expiration Term of Service (ETS) of 10 July 1991.
On 29 April 1987, the applicant’s current enlistment was extended until 28
May 1987 due to his failure to meet his maximum allowable weight (MAW). On
3 May 1987, the applicant was identified as being seven pounds over his MAW
of 199 pounds. After evaluation and counseling by the medical clinic, the
applicant was cleared for WMP entry. On 17 June 1987, his commander
temporarily increased the applicant’s MAW to 205 pounds based on his
military appearance, the use of body fat measurement (BFM), and the
recommendation of the medical practitioner. On 14 November 1987, the
applicant weighed 219 pounds during a weight check, resulting in his
enrollment into the Air Force Reserve (AFRES) “Informal” WMP for failure to
maintain his MAW. His commander notified the applicant that he was
ineligible to reenlist while enrolled in the WMP and failure to maintain
his MAW could result in his separation. The applicant acknowledged receipt
of the notification. Under the AFRES Informal WMP the applicant was given
90 days to reach his MAW. On 9 April 1988, after failing weight checks on
5 December 1987, 9 January 1988, 8 February 1988, and 26 March 1989, the
applicant was enrolled into the Formal WMP. After satisfactory weigh-ins
in May and June of 1988, the applicant was red-lined (loss of pay and
points for training) for the 9 July 1988 Unit Training Assembly (UTA) for
unsatisfactory progress in the WMP when he gained weight instead of
continuing to lose weight. On 20 August 1988, the applicant weighed-in at
his MAW of 199 and was allowed to participate in training. He was placed
into Phase II of the WMP and required to be weighed monthly for a period of
six months. Following an injury he sustained during training in August
1988, the applicant’s weight checks were put in a pending status due to his
non-participation.
In August 1988, the applicant received medical care following an injury he
sustained to his back while performing Reserve duty. The diagnosis was a
slipped disc on C-1 and re-injury of a pre-existing back condition.
According to a physical profile serial report, dated 30 August 1988, the
applicant was placed on temporary restriction indicating he could no longer
participate for pay or points until a full medical evaluation was completed
to determine his world wide service fitness or to perform in his Air Force
duty as a firefighter. The report indicated the applicant was also
disabled from his civilian employment as a firefighter. A memorandum from
his commander, dated 23 October 1988, notified the applicant that his
physical profile report dated 12 October 1988, found the applicant world
wide qualified; however, certain restrictions were imposed that would
interfere with his duties as a Prime Beef team member. His commander
instructed the applicant to report for duty on the scheduled UTA scheduled
for 5-6 November 1988 for career counseling and possible retraining into
another career field. According to the applicant’s Point Credit Summary
prepared 14 October 1989, the last training the applicant performed was 13-
14 August 1988.
On 3 March 1989, the applicant was reassigned to the Non-obligated, Non-
participating Ready Personnel Section (NNPRS) due to non-participation.
The applicant was honorably discharged from the Air Force Reserve on 10
July 1991 upon his ETS. His unit was disbanded effective the same day.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPP recommends denial. DPP states the applicant’s records indicate he
completed 26 years, 3 months, and 6 days of honorable Federal service as of
his discharge from the Air Force Reserve; however, only 18 years, 4 months,
and 9 days of this time was satisfactory service creditable toward
retirement pay eligibility. There is no documentation in the applicant’s
record that indicates he was medically disqualified for continued military
service.
DPP states the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995,
which was signed into law on 5 October 1994, amended Title 10 United States
Code (USC), Section 12731 to include early qualification for retired pay
for members who were medically disqualified for duty. To establish
eligibility for Reserve retired pay at age 60 under the provisions of Title
10 USC, Section 12731a, for physical disqualification, a member must have
completed at least 15 years, but less than 20 years, of satisfactory
Federal service and been medically disqualified for military service on or
after 5 October 1994. Since the applicant’s record does not show he was
medically disqualified and he was honorably discharged prior to 5 October
1994, he is not eligible for Reserve retired pay or any other benefits
associated with retired pay, under this provision.
DPP states RTAP was established to offer compensation to members of the
Selected Reserve who were separated involuntarily due to force reduction
measures (i.e. base closures, unit inactivation, relocation, and tenure
programs) used to shape the future force. From 23 October 1992 to 31
December 2001, a member of the Selected Reserve involuntarily transferred
from the Selected Reserve with at least 15 years, but less than 20 years,
of satisfactory service and was involuntarily separated due to force
reduction, was eligible for retirement under the provisions of Title 10
USC, Section 12731a. Since the applicant was discharged from the Air Force
Reserve prior to the enactment of this provision of law, he is not eligible
for RTAP pay or Reserve Retired pay.
The AFPC/DPP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force Evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8
April 2005, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). In
response the applicant forwarded copies of his service records, and two
statements from his civilian doctors. The copies of service records are
included at Exhibit B. The statements from the applicant’s civilian
doctors are at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the available
records, we found no evidence that the individual is eligible for
retirement under the provisions of Title 10, USC, Section 12731. We note a
member must have 20 years of satisfactory Federal service, with the last
eight years of qualifying service in a Reserve component, to be eligible
for Reserve retired pay. Additionally, we note the applicant does not
qualify for early retirement under the provisions of the National Defense
Authorization Act of 1995 nor does he qualify for compensation under RTAP.
The evidence provided confirms the applicant was credited with 26 years, 3
months, and 6 days of honorable Federal service; however, the record
indicates that only 18 years, 4 months, and 9 days of this time was
satisfactory Federal service credible toward retired pay eligibility.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence by the applicant that would lead us
to believe he participated as an active member of the Air Force Reserve to
a greater degree than that indicated by his record or that his point credit
histories are improperly recorded, we agree with the assessment by the Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their conclusions as our
findings in this case. Accordingly, the applicant’s request is not
favorably considered.
__________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
__________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 8 September 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael J. Novel, Panel Chair
Ms. Cheryl V. Jacobson, Member
Mr. Terry L. Scott, Member
The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2005-00823
was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Mar 05, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPP, dated 5 Apr 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Apr 05.
Exhibit E. Applicant’s Rebuttal, dated 14 May 05, w/atchs.
MICHAEL J. NOVEL
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01222
He remained in the WMP for a period of 2 years and 10 months, during which time he received 2 LORS, control roster action, and demotion to the grade of sergeant for his failure to maintain Air Force weight standards. His military medical records indicate that during two separate separation physical examinations he was found medically qualified for separation and had described his health as very good, with no health problems. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01359
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge process. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02510
On 22 January 1988, his commander notified the applicant that he was being recommended for discharge due to his unsatisfactory performance, exceeding weight standards, according to Air Force Regulation 39-10, under the provisions of paragraph 5-26f. On 26 February 1988, the discharge authority accepted the conditional waiver and directed the applicant be honorably discharged without P&R The applicant was discharged effective 4 March 1988 with a honorable characterization of service, a...
On 20 May 1997, the applicant received an LOR for failure to reduce body fat or weight at the rate described for satisfactory progress in accordance with AFI 40-502, the WMP. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. The Directorate of Personnel Program Management, AFPC/DPPRRP, also reviewed this application and states that the law which allows for advancement of enlisted members of the Air Force, when their active service plus service on the retired list totals...
Applicant continued in t h e WMP and on 19 October 1990, he received a Letter of Counseling for being 29 % pounds over his MAW. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Acting Chief , Commander's Programs Branch, HQ AFPC/DPSFC, states that maintaining Air Force weight standards is an individual responsibility. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states, in summary, that he is not questioning whether the Air Force had the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02519
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. Applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 14 November 1991, for a period of six years. He had served a total of 22 years and 1 month of satisfactory service at the time of discharge, of which the last five were in the Air Force Reserve.
On or about 22 Nov 85, he failed to progress satisfactorily in the Air Force WMP by gaining 10 pounds instead of losing the 5 pounds required. On 30 Jan 89, the commander, Air Refueling Wing, , received the proposed demotion case against the applicant and agreed with the applicant’s commander that demotion action was appropriate, effective 30 Jan 89. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application...
She provided a letter from a new commander in which he proposes retroactive promotions based on his review of the records and opinion that her weight problem was outside her control and that her duty performance warranted such promotions. Had this been known, her previous commander would have requested promotion from the wing commander. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01747
Since there was no Reserve Sanctuary law in place until 1992, the applicant could not have been placed in Sanctuary when he was transferred to the IRR in 1986 or discharged in 1988. If he had served two additional months, his satisfactory service time would have been completed. The applicant asserts that based on having over 18 years of service at the time of his discharge, he should have been placed in sanctuary and allowed to serve the time needed to retire.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02928
The Board recommended the applicant be discharged from the Air Force for unsatisfactory performance/exceeding weight standards with an honorable discharge, but that he be offered probation and rehabilitation opportunities with a conditional suspension of the discharge. Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommended denial indicating testimony of...