AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03486
DPPAT requested the applicant provide source documents showing that he was trained. Based on this eyewitness statement by an officer in the applicant’s chain of command, it is our opinion the applicant has provided sufficient evidence to show his injuries were sustained by actions of enemies of the United States and that it does meet the criteria for award of the Purple Heart Medal. NOVEL Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2004-03486 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03490
Both the applicant’s DD Form 214 and retirement order accurately reflect that, although he held the grade of staff sergeant on his final day of active duty on 28 February 1978, his retirement proceeded under the law that pertains to commissioned officers who have 20 or more years of active service and who also have at least 10 years of active service as a commissioned officer. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRRP recommended...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03496
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 10 Dec 04 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03498
(4) On or about 23 January 1980, applicant willfully disobeyed a lawful command from a superior commissioned officer, to return to his office. A FBI Report was forwarded to the applicant on 7 January 2005 for review and response within 15 days. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his discharge should be upgraded to honorable.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03505
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 7 January 2005, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. Therefore, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03508
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 20 Jun 77, for a period of four years in the grade of airman basic. He recommended applicant be discharged from the Air Force with a general discharge and that he be considered for rehabilitation under the provisions of AFM 39-12, Chapter 4. Applicant was discharged on 11 Jul 80, in the grade of airman, under the provisions of AFM 39-12, Unsuitable-Apathy,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03510
His medical records reveal that on 13 February 1968, he was treated for abrasions to both feet and knees. We note that the evidence of record shows that the applicant received medical treatment for abrasions to his feet and knees. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2004- 03510 in Executive Session on 24 February 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Michael J.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03511
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical consultant recommends the applicant’s request be denied. At the time of her discharge, there were several potential reasons that her commander could have discharged her for, including misconduct, drug abuse, unsuitability, and the reason he chose. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03512
The applicant provides a DVA letter, dated 5 Nov 01, addressed to the deceased member and signed by the DVA Assistant Deputy Under Secretary for Health, confirming the member’s receipt of the PH and placing him in Enrollment Priority Group 3. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant refers to the 5 Nov 01 DVA letter that “confirmed” the deceased member’s receipt of the PH, which was signed by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03515
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He enlisted in the Florida Air National Guard (FLANG) while a senior in high school. DPFOC contends ANG Instruction (ANGI) 36-2002, Enlistment and Reenlistment in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force, states airmen who graduate from BMTS may be promoted to A1C if their Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) is included on the Status of Resources and Training System (SORTS) list. DPFOC’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03516
INDEX CODE: 131.05 BC-2004-03516 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03517
INDEX CODE: 131.05 BC-2004-03517 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03518
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reiterated her original contentions that her records should be corrected to reflect her promotion to master sergeant effective as of 1 September 2004. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are not persuaded that her assertions, in and by themselves, are sufficiently persuasive...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03533
On 21 June 2000, the applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (DRB) requesting his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to honorable. (Exhibit B) _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. We note that as an act of clemency the Air Force Discharge Review Board upgraded his discharge to honorable and changed the narrative reason for separation to secretarial authority.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03534
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03534 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 MARCH 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code (K14) and reenlistment (RE) code (2H) be changed to allow him to reenter into military service. DPPRS’s evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03537
By the time he reached retirement eligibility he could no longer do the physical duties of his job. He voluntarily retired from the Air Force on 31 Dec 96, having served 21 years, 1 month, and 3 days on active duty. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance;...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03538
Although the applicant’s records reflect the battles and campaigns he participated in as New Guinea, Northern Solomons and the Bismarck Archipelago, we believe it is possible at the time the applicant was discharged and the separation document was prepared that instead of listing all the separate locations traveled by the 13th Bomber Command, they were grouped by the major location. Exhibit B. Reconstructed Personnel Records. MARTHA J. EVANS Panel Chair AFBCMR BC- BC-2004-03538 MEMORANDUM...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03539
INDEX CODE: 131.05 BC-2004-03539 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03540
INDEX CODE: 131.05 BC-2004-03540 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03541
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03541 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 20 MAY 2006 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason and related codes for his discharge on his separation document (DD 214) be changed from “Personality Disorder” to “Conditions That Interfere With Military Service –...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03542
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR indicated that after a complete review of the documentation provided by the applicant, they were unable to find any evidence of a recommendation from the applicant’s chain of command. The Secretary of the Air Force (SECAF) has designated the Commander, USCENTAF (COMUSCENTAF) as the approval authority for all Air Force decorations based solely upon service, performance, or achievements...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03544
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03544 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow him to rejoin the Armed Forces. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03546
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. However, if the decision is to grant the requested relief, applicant’s elimination record from JSUNT must be expunged to allow him to compete for CSO training. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03551
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair Attachment: Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPPPOO, dtd 3 Dec 04, with attachment AFBCMR BC-2004-03551 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that: a. Competent authority approved his...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03558
He was not notified of the change in policy of his SRB, and was miscounseled concerning whether or not he was eligible to reenlist immediately after school. In accordance with the governing instruction, AFI 36-2606, (Reenlistment in the United States Air Force) applicant had to reenlist within 30 days of class graduation date to receive the SRB that was in effect as of the date he was approved for retraining (31 July 2003). Applicant was not eligible to reenlist and receive an SRB...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03559
AFBCMR BC-2004-03559 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03562
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement and documentation associated with his CRSC application. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his shoulder condition, limited motion in cervical spine and back condition are not combat related. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03563
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPWB recommended denial noting the applicant was administratively demoted from TSgt to SrA with a DOR of 15 Jul 03. His commander also served him with a letter of reprimand (LOR), established an unfavorable information file (UIF), and his name was placed on a control roster for this conviction. Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03565
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03565 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 May 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, degenerative arthritis and knee condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03569
The applicant had completed a total of 4 years, 1 month and 14 days of active service and was serving in the grade of sergeant (E-4) at the time of separation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued in conjunction with his 29 August...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03571
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant was appointed a second lieutenant, Reserve of the Air Force on 8 Feb 73 and was voluntarily ordered to extended active duty on that same date. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03576
INDEX CODE: 121.03 AFBCMR BC-2004-03576 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03577
Examiner’s Note: Members, like the applicant, whose DIEUS is on or after 1 Aug 85 and are eligible for the CSB are notified with a “Notification of Career Status Bonus REDUX Eligibility” that they may make a choice of retiring under REDUX (40% at 20 years plus the CSB) or under High-3 (50% at 20 years). A member must submit the prescribed CSB/REDUX election form and any other required forms as directed in the eligibility notification no later than six months after they received eligibility...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03580
Therefore, DPFOC specifically recommends denial of his request to reenlist, to be restored to the grade of TSgt, consideration for promotion to the grade of master sergeant (MSgt), and his request for a discharge certificate. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are not persuaded that his uncorroborated assertion of command retribution denying him reenlistment, in and by itself, sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03584
INDEX CODE: 137.04 AFBCMR BC-2004-03584 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03587
The applicant’s Enlisted Performance Reports (EPRs) do not show any evidence of impairment of duty performance and there are no duty limiting profiles in his medical records. Further, active duty servicemembers who develop medical problems during the final 12 months of their active duty period are presumed fit for continued active duty unless there is clear and convincing evidence to the contrary. The Medical Consultant further states the evidence of record does not indicate that...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03588
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03588 INDEX CODE: 110.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 MARCH 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of discharge be changed from 15 September 1967 to 17 September 1967, and his record be corrected to show he served 4 years on active duty, rather than 3 years, 11 months and 28...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03589
It is DPPPWB’s opinion that the applicant’s request should be time barred since he waited 34 years to appeal to the Air Force Board for Corrections of Military Records; however, if the Board chooses to decide the case, they recommend denial of the applicant’s request based on lack of official documentation and rationale provided. Based on the evidence provided and the evidence of record, we notice that the applicant was considered for promotion to the grade of SMSgt in CY 1970; however, he...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03593
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPB recommends the application be denied. He was on the Reserve Active Status List and required to be considered for promotion. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03594
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03594 INDEX CODE: 131.03 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 May 2006 ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be reconsidered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion to lieutenant colonel with the academic information masked on his Officer Selection...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03596
Headquarters 5th Air Force legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient and recommended applicant’s request for discharge for the good of the service be approved and he be discharged in lieu of court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 19 January 2005, the applicant provided a letter stating none of the incidents were facts. The only incident that should be on this report is number 2, and by law that must be cleaned off in July.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03598
By authority of that order, he served in the grade of colonel until he was told he had to revert to the rank of lieutenant colonel due to overgrade considerations but would be retired at the grade of 0-6 since that was the highest grade held. He was promoted to the grade of colonel twice, and again asks that his records reflect he retired as a colonel. In April 1993, the Air Reserve Personnel Center Promotion Eligibility Branch received a letter dated 15 March 1993 signed by the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03608
INDEX CODE: 121.03 AFBCMR BC-2004-03608 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03614
AFBCMR BC-2004-03614 INDEX CODE: 36.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03618
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. On 19 July 2005, the Board reconsidered the applicant’s request and again denied his application for correction of military records. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing this application and the additional evidence provided in support of his appeal, it remains our opinion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03618-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03618 INDEX CODE: 110.03 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was assigned to the Non-Obligated Non- Participating Reserve Personnel Section (NNRPS) on 1 May 2001 rather than 22 October 2004. The Board also notes the applicant did not perform any...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03620
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He attained the grade of SSgt while in the US Navy and contends he should receive credit for the time in grade he held in that rank. He was promoted to staff sergeant (SSgt) with a date of rank (DOR) of 22 March 2004. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air National Guard office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03622
INDEX CODE 121.03 AFBCMR BC-2004-03622 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03623
Members of the Board, Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Ms. Cheryl V. Jacobson, and Ms. Josephine L. Davis, considered this application on 10 November 2005. The Board determined that the military records should be corrected as set forth in the attached copy of a Memorandum for the Chief of Staff United States Air Force. RALPH J. PRETE Chief Examiner Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS CASE TRANSMITTAL / COORDINATION RECORD IN THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03624
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, ANG/DPFOC, dtd 18 Oct 05, w/atch AFBCMR 1535 Command Drive EE Wing, 3rd Floor Andrews AFB, MD 20762-7002 APPLICANT Dear APPLICANT Your application to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-03624, has been finalized. The Board determined that the military records should be corrected as set forth in the attached copy of a Memorandum for the Chief of Staff United States Air Force. Copy of...