AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03625
His DOR to SSgt was changed to his enlistment date. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air National Guard office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03629
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03629 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 May 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation document be corrected to include the award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03633
He loved military life but was discharged for Personality Disorder due to his method of relieving stress [self-mutilation]. The applicant continued counseling at the Kadena MHC. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated on the circumstances of their separation.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03635
The appeal authority, the Air Combat Command Vice Commander, denied the appeal. Additionally, the applicant was advised of his right to counsel and consulted counsel prior to accepting nonjudicial punishment proceedings. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03638
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03638 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 23 Nov 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her record, to include an accurate career history brief, citation to accompany award of the Meritorious Service Medal, First Oak Leaf Cluster (MSM, 1 OLC), and the Officer...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03641
INDEX CODE: 137.04 BC-2004-03641 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03643
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board, Messrs. Michael J. NOVEL Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPPO, dtd 11 Feb 05, w/atchs AFBCMR BC-2004-03643 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03646
AFBCMR BC-2004-03646 INDEX CODE: 121.03 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03648
AFBCMR BC-2004-03648 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03652
INDEX CODE: 128.00 AFBCMR BC-2004-03652 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board Ms. Martha J. Evans, Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, and Mr. Gregory A. Parker...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03653
INDEX CODE: 121.03 BC-2004-03653 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03658
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 28 May 04, the applicant requested her conditional release from the Army Reserve to enter the Air Force Reserve. Eligibility for promotion to the grade of captain had to be established prior to that date. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 29 Dec 04 for review and...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03660
Applicant’s complete submissions are at Exhibit A. Applicant has not provided credible evidence why these awards were not placed in official channels and has not provided justification as to why these issues were not addressed until six years after the fact. However, other than his own uncorroborated assertions, no evidence has been submitted to show that recommendations for the AFAM and AFCM were placed into official military channels during the time periods in question but were not acted...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03661
INDEX CODE: 135.02 BC-2004-03661 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03663
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03663 INDEX CODE: 135.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be changed to reflect the period of service from 10 September 1992 to 9 September 1993 be changed from a combination of Regular and Reserve service, to Reserve service only, and that he be made eligible for transfer to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03669
The commander recommended the applicant receive a general (under honorable conditions) discharge based on the following: On 7 and 30 November 1984, the applicant wrongfully used marijuana, a scheduled I controlled substance. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommended denial and based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03672
DPPPR states that after a complete review of the applicant’s official military record and provided documentation, they were unable to verify his entitlement to the AM. The DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He applied for the AM at the suggestion of several Berlin Airlift veterans who had received the award for flying 100 missions or more on the Airlift. It is not awarded for peace...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03674
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP2 recommends the application be denied. DPAPP2 states there are no records in the applicant’s Military Personnel Records to verify he was TDY to Vietnam.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03678
INDEX CODE: 131.05 BC-2004-03678 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03679
INDEX CODE: 131.05 BC-2004-03679 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03681
The officers being considered by these promotion boards have OPRs with different closeout dates. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14 Jan 05, for review and comment within 30 days. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair AFBCMR 2004-03681 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03682
As such, DPPP is not convinced the contested report is not accurate as written and they do not support the request for removal and replacement DPPP further states the applicant agrees with the decision that the time to dispute an EPR is before it became a matter of record. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant disagrees with the DPPP and ERAB assessments...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03683
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2004-03683 INDEX CODE: 131.01 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 June 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His two nonselections to lieutenant colonel be removed; he be granted a waiver of date of rank provisions to allow sufficient time to build a competitive...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03684
At the time of her discharge from the Navy on 4 September 2001, she held the rank of E-5; however, when she enlisted in the Air Force on 8 May 2003, she was enlisted in the grade of E-4. She is currently serving in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5), with a date of rank of 1 February 2005, and an effective date of 24 February 2005. The applicant contends she should have received a waiver for the time she spent in the Navy and been allowed to enlist in the Air Force in the grade of staff sergeant.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03688
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03688 INDEX CODE: 131.00, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 JUN 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY04B (12 July 2004) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board, with a...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03690
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03690 INDEX CODE: 129.04 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 JUNE 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retired pay be recalculated to reflect his Air National Guard service he performed after retirement. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03695
The discharge authority approved the separation and directed that applicant be discharged with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge without P&R. Items 11, 10 and 9 had to do with reading the newspaper on duty. Prior to being under Sergeant Z---‘s command, he enjoyed the military and working with patients, which he still does today.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03696
His CRSC application was disapproved on 21 Oct 04 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be combat- related. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03698
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03698 INDEX CODE: 110.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES Mandatory Case Completion Date: 7 Jun 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of separation be changed to reflect an effective date of 18 Feb 76, rather than 1 Sep 77. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03700
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03700 INDEX CODE: 105.01, 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 Jun 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1994 dishonorable discharge be upgraded to general. The applicant and his family underwent family counseling for marital difficulties and behavioral problems with the stepmother...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03703
He received four Airman Performance Reports (APRs) closing 28 July 1981, 18 July 1982, 3 February 1983 and 26 August 1983, in which the overall evaluations were “9,” “9,” “9,” and “8.” On 16 September 1983, applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending discharge from the Air Force for misconduct. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03711
To do so will subject you to forfeiture of travel pay.” In addition to the memo, the member received an EAD order, AF Form 766, that clearly states (in block 13) in bold letters “Do not begin travel prior to your effective date of duty.” All detachment commanders are required to provide the aforementioned memo. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03718
In order to establish eligibility for Reserve retired pay at age 60, he must complete 20 years of satisfactory service with the last 6 qualifying years in a Reserve component. If he obtains/or has a waiver for age, he would be unable to obtain 20 years satisfactory service for a Reserve Retirement by age 67. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPP recommended denial and stated the member will not complete 20 years of satisfactory...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03720
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03720 INDEX NUMBER: 104.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The DD Form 785, “Record of Disenrollment from Officer Candidate-Type Training,” prepared on him, dated 13 Jan 01, be amended in Section IV, “Evaluation to be Considered in the Future for Determining Acceptability...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03722
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAMF2 states the applicant signed a statement of understanding, which reads “I understand that I must be on the Active Duty List in order to be considered for active duty promotion by a central selection board. Had he remained on active duty, he would have been promoted to major on 3 December 2001. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03723
We can, however, if the evidence warrants, make a recommendation to the approving authority that a member be considered for the Medal of Honor. It appears the authorities at the time determined the DFC was the more appropriate award for the former member’s extraordinary achievement and we find no basis upon which to disagree with that determination. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03728
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. Once he reaches age 60 (Apr 2008), he may reapply and will be considered for CRSC under the guidelines in place at that time. c. Is entitled to retired pay, notwithstanding that such retired pay may be reduced due to receipt of Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) disability compensation.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03730
AFBCMR BC-2004-03730 INDEX CODE: 100.06 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03731
On 14 April 1999, an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, was initiated not recommending his reenlistment. The DPPAE evaluation, with attachments, at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Feb 2005 for review and comment within 30 days. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03732
The efficiency index ratings for incidental assignments should not be included because insufficient time is available for proper evaluation. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPO recommends denial. Effective 13 December 1945,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03733
______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the applicant’s records is warranted. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In spite of the Air Force advisory opinion, she still contends she does not have Bipolar Disorder and the symptoms she was having, while on...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03742
He applied for both pilot and navigator training with the active Air Force and was selected for SUNT. When he declined active duty navigator training, he also turned in separation paperwork in order to fly with the Reserves. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was not considered for pilot and navigator training by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03743
INDEX CODE: 137.04 AFBCMR BC-2004-03743 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03744
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03744 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive a constructive reenlistment effective 1 March 2004 for 4 years and 13 months and that he be authorized a Zone B, multiple 2.0, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for four years. IAW AFI 36-2606 (Reenlistment in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03752
INDEX CODE: 137.04 BC-2004-03752 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03760
Based on the available documentation the following facts are provided. Now he would like to upgrade his service record. Applicant's complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. Applicant provided a statement in regards to his FBI Report stating after 1961 he found a good job and has straightened his life out.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03761
The applicant does not offer evidence in support of the claim as required by AFI 36-2603, Air Force for Correction of Military Records, and AFP 36-2607, Applicant's Guide to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR). The applicant did not participate in VEAP, therefore, does not qualify under the law to participate in VEAP or convert to the MGIB under the current statues. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03763
INDEX CODE: 112.05 AFBCMR BC-2004-03763 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03768
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAC evaluated the applicant’s claim that he was assigned outside his career field for four years and should have been retrained. The applicant’s claim he should have been afforded the opportunity to retrain into another career field because he was performing duties outside his primary AFSC for four years is also without merit. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03774
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03774 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 JUN 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, right knee prothesis, left knee condition, and individual unemployability, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under...