Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03618
Original file (BC-2004-03618.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

SECOND ADDENDUM TO
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-03618
            INDEX CODE:  110.03

      XXXXXXXXXXXXXX   COUNSEL: XXXXXXXXXXXXX

      XXXXXXXXXXXXXX   HEARING DESIRED:  NO

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to show he was assigned to the Non-Obligated  Non-
Participating Reserve Personnel Section (NNRPS) on 1 May 2001  rather  than
22 October 2004.

___________________________________________________________________


STATEMENT OF FACTS


On 28 March 2005, the applicant's request that his records be corrected  to
show he was assigned to the NNRPS on 1 May 2001,  rather  than  22  October
2004, was considered and denied by the Board.  For  an  accounting  of  the
facts and circumstances  surrounding  the  applicant’s  request,  and,  the
rationale of  the  earlier  decision  by  the  Board,  see  the  Record  of
Proceedings at Exhibit F.

On 22 May 2005, the applicant submitted additional supporting documentation
for reconsideration.  In his request, he provided a personal  statement,  a
copy of an email from the Air Force Doctrine Center (AFDC) informing him of
the status of his assignment to the AFDC,  a  letter  from  the  Air  Force
Information Warfare Center (AFIWC), a letter from the AFDC on the Status of
Hiring, and a series of emails to the Air Reserve Personnel Center.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G.

On 19 July 2005, the Board reconsidered the applicant’s request  and  again
denied  his  application  for  correction  of  military  records.   For  an
accounting of the  facts  and  circumstances  surrounding  the  applicant’s
request, and the rationale of the decision by the Board, see the Record  of
Proceedings at Exhibit H.

On  27  August  2005,  the  applicant   submitted   additional   supporting
documentation for reconsideration.  In his request, he provided a  personal
statement, a matrix, which separates what he believe are factors and  time-
line sequences, Air Force Manual 36-8001, Reserve
Personnel Participation and Training Procedures, Second Deferral
for Promotion Memorandum, and a series of emails.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit I.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

After again reviewing this application and the additional evidence provided
in support of his appeal, it remains our opinion that the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. In further support of his  appeal
the applicant provided documentation  which  appears  to  be  refuting  the
assertion that only after being faced with discharge did he make any effort
to secure a paid assignment  or  reassignment  to  the  Non-Obligated  Non-
Participating Reserve Personnel Section.  His contentions  are  duly  noted
and since the documentation he provided has been  previously  addressed  by
the Air Force office of primary responsibility, we see no need  to  further
comment on this issue.  Having reconsidered all the matters before  us,  it
remains our opinion that the applicant  has  not  provided  evidence  which
would  show  that  the  actions  taken  by  the  Air  Force  Reserves  were
inappropriate, not in accordance with the governing regulations, or that he
was denied rights to which he  was  entitled.  Therefore,  it  remains  our
opinion that the  applicant  has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or
injustice.   Accordingly,  the  applicant’s  request   is   not   favorably
considered.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence  not
considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2004-03618
in Executive Session on 7 November 2005, under the provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

                       Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
                       Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
                       Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:


    Exhibit H.  Record of Proceedings, dated 15 Aug 05,
                with Exhibits A through G.
    Exhibit I.  Applicant's Submission, dated 27 Aug 05, w/atchs.




                             THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                             Chair



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03618-3

    Original file (BC-2004-03618-3.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    THIRD ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03618-3 INDEX CODE: 110.03 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: XXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was assigned to the Non-Obligated Non- Participating Reserve Personnel Section (NNRPS) on 1 May 2001 rather than 22 October 2004. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03618-2

    Original file (BC-2004-03618-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03618 INDEX CODE: 110.03 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was assigned to the Non-Obligated Non- Participating Reserve Personnel Section (NNRPS) on 1 May 2001 rather than 22 October 2004. The Board also notes the applicant did not perform any...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00419

    Original file (BC-2006-00419.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00419 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 AUG 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, dated 8 August 2005, be removed from her records and her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03564

    Original file (BC-2004-03564.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03564 INDEX CODE: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NONE xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 MAY 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show restoration of lost points, lost pay, compensation for lost promotion opportunities, consideration for retirement eligibility,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2004-00944-2

    Original file (BC-2004-00944-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit H. On 8 September 2006, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration (Exhibit I), as the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit had provided a decision in the aforementioned case (Exhibit J). JAA provided an advisory on 19 September 2006 that recommended denial of the applicant’s reconsideration...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-01103-2

    Original file (BC-2005-01103-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS On 21 February 2006, the Board considered and denied his request but because of ongoing litigation (Doe v. Rumsfeld) surrounding the Anthrax Vaccination Program (AVIP) the Board provided a caveat that should the plaintiffs in the aforementioned case prevail against the Secretary of Defense, the Board would reconsider the applicant’s request. After careful and deliberate review of the HQ USAF/JAA advisory...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2000-00012-3

    Original file (BC-2000-00012-3.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Second Addendum to the Record of Proceedings is at Exhibit W. In his most recent request for reconsideration, applicant contends he should not have been assigned to the Non-participating Ready Reserve Section (NNRPS) in January 1998. At the time he was assigned to NNRPS, he was and still is not qualified for worldwide duty in accordance with ARPC/SGPA memorandum dated 21 May 97. After careful consideration of the applicant's submission it is our opinion that the Air Force Reserve...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03651

    Original file (BC-2005-03651.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03651 INDEX CODE: 131.01 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 JUN 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His non-selections for the FY03 and FY04 Major Special Selection Boards (SSBs) be set aside and that he be allowed to participate in the Air Force Reserve. At the time of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01279-2

    Original file (BC-2006-01279-2.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit D. On 15 August 2006, he requested reconsideration based on new evidence provided by his commander. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to applicant be corrected to show that he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00737-2

    Original file (BC-2007-00737-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant was credited with 11.30 years of active duty service for pay at the time of his discharge. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation, and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F. In Jun 06, the applicant submitted a request questioning Defense Finance and Accounting Service’s (DFAS’s) authority to recoup the severance pay he received at discharge and requested they provide him...