RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01506
INDEX CODE 131.00 107.00
COUNSEL: BRENT WINTERS
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
In two applications to the Board, dated 3 April and May 2002, the applicant
requests that he be retired from the Air Force Reserve in the grade of
major, rather than retired from the Regular Air Force as a senior master
sergeant (E-8), with back pay from 1979, and awarded the Purple Heart (PH).
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
When he turned 62 years old in 1979, he should have received pay as a
major, but instead received the retirement of an E-8. He retired from the
Regular Air Force on 1 January 1963 and was promoted to the grade of major
in the Air Force Reserve on 1 July 1962.
He should have received the PH for being wounded in action during World War
II when his B-17 aircraft was shot-down deep in enemy territory and he was
brutally beaten into a senseless condition resulting in contusions and
broken bones (i.e., broken jaw, face and head lacerations, and multiple
bruises and contusions on his arms, legs, and buttocks), prior to being
interned as a Prisoner-of-War (POW).
In support of the appeal, applicant submits his personal statement and a
statement from the former co-pilot of his aircrew.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served on active duty as a second lieutenant during the
period 23 October 1943 through 24 November 1945, as a B-17 bombardier.
While on a mission over Germany on 20 June 1944, his aircraft was shot down
and he was captured and interned as a Prisoner-of-War (POW).
He was returned to United States control on 29 April 1945.
The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action
(i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced
aircraft bail out injuries, etc.) that required or received treatment by
medical personnel. The criteria was later amended to add persons wounded
or injured at the hands of their captors while held as POWs before 25 April
1952.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by
the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
AFPC/DPPRRP recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that
all criteria of the pertinent laws (i.e., Section 8914, 8964 and 8961,
Title 10, United States Code) have been met and no error or injustices
occurred in the applicant’s retirement, grade determination, or advancement
in grade action. The applicant applied for voluntary retirement from the
Regular Air Force as an E-8 and indicated that he did not desire to be
assigned to the Retired Reserve Section and placed on the United States Air
Force Reserve Retired List in his Reserve commissioned officer status
concurrently with his retirement as a Regular enlisted member. Effective 1
January 1963, he retired in the grade of senior master sergeant and his
orders indicated that the highest pay grade he held on active duty was a
second lieutenant. Upon completion of 30 years service, he was eligible
for advancement to the grade of second lieutenant; however, since
advancement to the grade of second lieutenant would result in his receipt
of less retired pay, he was provided an opportunity to choose the grade and
pay scale under which he would receive retired pay. While there is no
documentation in his records to indicate what his exact election was,
according to the Personnel Data System, he elected not to be advanced to
the grade of second lieutenant.
The AFPC/DPPRRP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that
the applicant’s Report of Separation shows that he received no wounds as a
direct result of enemy action. In addition, his own statement shows that
civilians, not his German captors, beat him. Furthermore, he has not
provided any medical or personal statements to substantiate his claims.
Although the co-pilot of the aircraft has provided a statement, the
statement only testifies to the extent of the injuries, not that he
witnessed the injuries being incurred. As such, the statement is not an
eyewitness account.
The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
Complete copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 19 July 2002 for review and response within 30 days. However,
as of this date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice warranting award of the PH. The applicant
contends he should be awarded the PH for wounds he received when his B-17
aircraft was shot-down deep in enemy territory and he was brutally beaten
prior to being interned as a POW. As a result of the beating, his jaw was
broken, he received lacerations to his face and head, and multiple bruises
and contusions on his arms, legs, and buttocks – all of which required
medical treatment. The Recognition Programs Branch recommends denial of
this request because the applicant received injuries at the hands of
civilians, not his German captors, as indicated in his personal statement.
We disagree. In this respect, we note that based on the applicant’s
personal statement, it is apparent the German soldiers allowed the
civilians to beat him. While the applicant may not have been beaten by the
German soldiers themselves, he was beaten while under their control. As
such, we believe his injuries were the direct result of enemy action.
Therefore, we recommend he be awarded the PH.
4. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice warranting his retirement from the Air
Force Reserve in the grade of major. The applicant voluntarily retired
from the Regular Air Force in the grade of senior master sergeant. At the
time of his retirement, he indicated that he did not desire to be assigned
to the Retired Reserve Section and placed on the United States Air Force
Reserve Retired List in his Reserve commissioned officer status
concurrently with his retirement as a Regular enlisted member. His
retirement orders indicate the highest pay grade he held on active duty was
a second lieutenant. Upon his completion of 30 years service, he was
eligible for advancement to the grade of second lieutenant; however, since
his advancement to the grade of second lieutenant would result in his
receipt of less retired pay, he was provided an opportunity to choose the
grade and pay scale under which he would receive retired pay (i.e., senior
master sergeant or second lieutenant). While there is no documentation in
his records to indicate what his election was, the Personnel Data System
indicates that he elected not to be advanced to the grade of second
lieutenant. In view of this, and since there has been no showing that any
errors or injustices occurred in the processing of his retirement, grade
determination, and advancement in grade action, we find no basis upon which
to recommend favorable consideration of this portion of his application.
5. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to
our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a
hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart for
injuries received in action against an enemy of the United States during a
mission over Magdeburg, Germany on 20 June 1944.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-01506 in
Executive Session on 12 September 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Panel Chair
Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Forms 149, dated 3 Apr & May 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRRP, dated 14 Jun 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 19 Jun 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jul 02.
JACKSON A. HAUSLEIN
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 02-01506
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple
Heart for injuries received in action against an enemy of the United States
during a mission over Magdeburg, Germany on 20 June 1944.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00533
The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He did suffer the atrocity of beatings to his lower back while a POW at Stalag Luft IV and the DVA has determined his lower back condition is service-connected for the injury received while a POW. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the Board finds...
While receiving treatment, he was informed that he was to receive the PH Medal for service-connected injuries at the hands of the enemy. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. 2 AFBCMR 96-03428 APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and indicated that he is extremely disappointed in DPPPRA' s recommendation to deny his application. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 23 Feb 98.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-03224
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the PH medal. AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the PH medal. The applicant has not provided any documentation or corroborating evidence that he suffered any injuries or wounds while a POW in Germany.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03192
He was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) on 8 April 1945, for wounds received in the ETO on 24 March 1945. The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19 March 2004 for review and response. The applicant was awarded the PH on 8 April 1945, for wounds he received during a forced aircraft bail out on 24 March 1945.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04015
After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the statement from the former POW, the majority of the Board is not persuaded the applicant was wounded as a direct result of enemy action. The applicant is a former Army Air Corps B-17, Flying Fortress, navigator who seeks award of the Purple Heart (PH) for wounds received during a bombing mission over Berlin, Germany, on 20 February 1944. The majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence to demonstrate that he was injured...
The applicant has not provided any documentation showing that he received medical treatment for either injury and there is no documentation in his medical file mentioning either of these injuries. Therefore, we conclude that any doubt should be resolved in this applicant’s favor and recommend he be awarded the PH for injuries sustained after bailing out of his B-24 bomber on 9 Feb 45. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, dated 31 Jul 02, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01675
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01675 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal for an injury he sustained when his aircraft was shot down on 4 Aug 44, and any other awards to which he may be entitled. His available records reflect he enlisted in the Army on...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03304
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that applicant has provided no medical evidence showing that he was injured while a POW, and there is no evidence in his military medical records to indicate he was injured while a POW. Additionally, in 1988, the Veterans Administration determined the evidence of record did not show right ankle or right knee injuries. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00806
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00806 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Purple Heart (PH). The complete HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He states his...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00937
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR advises that, to be awarded the PH, a member must provide detailed evidence/documentation to support he was wounded as a direct result of enemy action and received treatment by medical personnel. By the time he was liberated from the POW camp nine months later, his wounds had healed and no further treatment was necessary. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 13 Jun 04, w/atchs.