RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01422
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: JACK QUINN
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His discharge be changed from uncharacterized to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant states that an entry level separation does
not attempt to characterize the type of service as either good or bad.
In order for a member discharged by entry level separation to receive
an honorable characterization, there must be unusual circumstantces of
personal conduce and performance of military duty that warrants
consideration by the Secretary of the Air Force. His uncharacterized
entry level separation during the first 6 months was proper, and that
no error or injustice occurred in this case. Therefore, he is of the
opinion that no change in the records is warranted.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with
the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge
regulation. Additionally, the discharge was within the sound
discretion of the discharge authority. They also agree with the
AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommendation that no change is warranted
in his narrative reason for separation and application should be
denied.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 21 June 2002, a complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. As
of this date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Staff
and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. The Board
notes that there is no stigma attached to an entry-level
characterization of service. An entry level separation, in and of
itself, is not a reflection of the individual’s character or
performance but, rather, an indication of the length of time an
individual served. In accordance with Department of Defense and Air
Force Instructions, all airmen are given entry-level
separation/uncharacterized service characterization when separation is
initiated in the first 180 days of continuous active service,
regardless of the reason for separation. In this case, the applicant
served 1 month and 20 days of total active military service.
Therefore, an entry level separation was appropriate in this case and
we find no basis upon which to recommend changing the character of
service.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application on 14
August 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr., Panel Chair
Mr. Thomas J. Topolski, Jr., Member
Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Apr 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 29 May 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 17 Jun 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 21 Jun 02.
ALBERT F. LOWAS, JR.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01422
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant states that an entry level separation does not attempt to characterize the type of service as either good or bad. In order for a member discharged by entry level separation to receive an honorable characterization, there must be unusual circumstantces of personal conduce and performance of military duty that warrants consideration by the Secretary of the Air Force. Therefore,...
The military mental health providers had followed the applicant for several months and were fully aware of his pattern of behavior over a prolonged period of time and were thus able to confidently make the diagnosis of personality disorder. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 21 June 2002, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02030
On 25 March 2002, the applicant's commander notified him that he was being discharged for mental disorders, specifically a personality disorder. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE indicates that based on the review of his case file, his RE code 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” is correct. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00236 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-01539
The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Complete copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 21 November 2003 for review and response within 30 days. Furthermore, RE code 4C is a code that can be waived for prior service enlistment consideration, provided he meets all other requirements for enlistment under an existing prior service program. Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02443
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02443 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His entry-level separation be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 25 Jun 02, applicant received an uncharacterized entry-level separation, by reason of “Entry Level Performance and Conduct,” and was issued an RE code of 2C...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01104
On 23 Jul 02, she was notified of her commander’s intent to recommend an entry-level separation (ELS) from the Air Force. She received an RE code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge or ELS without characterization of service). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00129 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge code be changed. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantiive requirements of...
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant was discharged on 18 February 1999, after 6 months on active duty and after being identified with an adjustment disorder. He indicated that the applicant had an adjustment disorder with personality traits that interfered with his military duties/training and was the cause of his discharge. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00231 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: a. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed applicant's request and states that he was separated from the Air Force based on a diagnosis of...