RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00837 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code and Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C). They indicated that based upon the documentation in the file, they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation at that time. ...
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR 02-00840 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
The applicant’s responses and the state senator’s letter are provided at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/JAG notes the applicant is correct that [paragraph 11] of his contract did not obligate him to repay the costs of his education. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00849 INDEX CODE: 111.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Education/Training Report (TR), rendered for the period 2 Jun 92 through 27 Sep 93, be replaced with the revised TR provided, which include squadron commander comments on his performance as a flight commander. ++ Top report at the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00850 INDEX CODE: 102.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) to the Air Force Reserve grade of major be adjusted to reflect the time he served in the Army Reserve as a major. This credit reflected his prior commissioned service with the Army and Army Reserve, and his...
In the applicant's case, he waited almost 7 years after he states he discovered the alleged error or injustice before he filed a claim, although the applicant knew when he applied for retirement in 3 Oct 67, the highest grade he held on active duty was master sergeant (MSgt). Therefore, based on the rationale provided they recommend denying the applicant’s request (Exhibit C). In the applicant's case, the grade is MSgt (Exhibit D).
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00852 INDEX CODE: 131.09 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement pay grade advancement to staff sergeant (E-5), effective 3 June 2004, be changed to 2003 rather than 2004. AC- 021666, dated 13 September 1993, reveals that, effective 3 June 2004, the applicant will be advanced to the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00853 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) for his four years of active duty. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the...
INDEX CODE: 112.00 AFBCMR 02-00855 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
Ineligibility occurs on the date of the Secretarial determination and is effective that date, irrespective of the fact that a member may be on an announced promotion selection list awaiting promotion, or that the member may actually retire or separate for physical disability on a date subsequent to the determination. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his records should be changed to reflect that he had been promoted to...
In support of the appeal, the applicant submits copies of her DD Form 214, retirement orders, and the certificate and citation to accompany the award of the BSM. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be...
However, based on the supporting statement from the former MPF chief and the superior ratings the applicant has received before and since, the majority of the Board believes the possibility exists that the contested EPR may be flawed. Therefore, in order to offset the possibility of an injustice, the Board majority concludes that any doubt should be resolved in this applicant’s favor by voiding the 31 Jul 99 EPR from his records and granting him supplemental promotion consideration. ...
INDEX 112.07 128.05 AFBCMR 02-00860 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Mr. James W. Russell III and Mr. John E. B. Smith considered this application on 20 June 2002. RAYMOND H....
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFBCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant’s service medical record, which appears to be complete since it includes a report of his induction physical, contains no references to any hospitalization in Florida. There is no evidence in the service medical record to support the applicant’s request. Pre-existing medical conditions incurred prior to a member’s entrance on active duty are not ratable...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00862 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. The complete response is at Exhibit F. In her third letter, the applicant indicates that while detained during the discharge...
After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded at this time that the contested EPR should be amended to reflect a senior rater indorsement. We also note the applicant had completed Senior NCO Academy and, except for the report in question, received senior rater indorsements on his EPRs since 5 Nov 97. Exhibit G. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 29 May 02.
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPE recommends denial of the applicant’s request to void his OPR closing 20 Apr 99 and to place a statement in his records. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request for promotion consideration by SSB. The applicant provides information that he believes supports his contention that his duty performance never suffered from issues involving his family.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPO evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 17 May 02 for review and response. We note that the MSM (2OLC) was not required to be filed in the applicant’s records when he was considered for promotion by the CY01B Lieutenant Colonel Board. ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00868 INDEX CODE: 102.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he was promoted to the grade of captain on 2 Apr 51, to the grade of major on 19 Apr 55, and to the grade of lieutenant colonel on 1 Jul 62. ...
AFBCMR 02-00869 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
Members of the Board Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Mr. Frederick R. Beaman III, and Ms. Cheryl Dare, considered this application on 28 August 2002. ROSCOE HINTON, JR. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 9 Aug 02 AFBCMR 02-00872 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR states Public Law (PL) 99-145, established on 8 Nov 85, required as of 1 Mar 86 spousal concurrence of the SBP election, if the election was providing less than maximum spouse coverage. He declined SBP coverage prior to his 1 Apr 88 retirement. There is no evidence that the servicemember made an election for spouse coverage during either open enrollment period.
AFBCMR 02-00875 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00876 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive the difference between the 2.5 multiple Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the 1A4X1 AFSC and a 3.0 SRB for the 1A4X1D. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...
AFBCMR 02-00877 Index Number: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00883 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for her separation, Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service, be changed. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/DPZ reviewed applicant’s request and recommends...
AFBCMR 02-00888 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff...
INDEX CODE: 135.02 AFBCMR 02-00889 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit C. On 12 May 92, the Board considered and denied an application pertaining to the applicant, requesting that she be returned to active duty and promoted to the grade of major. On 15 May 95, the AFBCMR directed that her record be corrected, that she be returned to active duty, that she be promoted to major with a date of rank of 1 Sep 88, and that she not be considered nonselected for promotion to lieutenant colonel until...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit...
The coverage, by law, is automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who have a spouse and/or children, unless the member declines coverage. In addition to the letters, articles were published in the September/October and November/December 2001 Air Reserve Personnel Update explaining the change to the program. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-00894 in Executive Session on 24 July 2002...
AFBCMR 02-00898 Index Number: 108.10 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum...
After careful consideration of applicant's requests and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be...
AFBCMR 02-00908 INDEX NUMBER: 128.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the Pentagon leadership took adequate steps to inform all members of the increase in coverage and the...
AFBCMR 02-00910 INDEX CODE: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
The two periods of leave should have been time off and not charged as leave. There are commanders that take care of their careers and then there are commanders that want to be good leaders and managers. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-00919 in Executive Session on 18 Jul 02, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr., Panel Chair Mr. Mike Novel, Member Ms. Marilyn Thomas,...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that based on the documentation in the file, the discharge...
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR 02-00924 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AFBCMR 02-00926 INDEX CODE: 110.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
INDEX CODE: 102.07 AFBCMR 02-00927 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the applicant's military records (Exhibit B) and in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his UOTHC discharge should be upgraded to honorable. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 4 Apr 02.
In this regard, the applicant apparently believed that certain inactive periods with the USPHS were creditable towards satisfactory service and, as a medical officer, he would be retained until age 68. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that: a. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-00932 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...
However, the applicant appears to have made a particularly diligent effort before the CY01B board convened to have the duty title for the 28 Jun 00 entry changed from “Student” to “Air Attaché.” The Board majority agrees with the Air Force that this entry is significant enough to warrant SSB consideration. The contested Assignment History entries were administratively updated by the Air Force after the selection board convened. He was assigned as an Air Attaché in June 2000; the selection...
INDEX CODE: 112.00 AFBCMR 02-00944 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
Effective 17 July 1972, he was removed from the TDRL and transferred to the Air Force Reserve for completion of military service obligation in the grade of sergeant effective with the date of transfer and with date of rank of 1 November 1971. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00948 INDEX CODE 128.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His original reenlistment contract, authorizing a Zone B, Multiple 2.0 Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be reinstated. Two of the contracts, he had signed on the dotted line, made him morally and legally responsible to uphold his part...