Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200874
Original file (0200874.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-00874
            INDEX CODE:137.00

      APPLICANT (Deceased)   COUNSEL:  None

      SSN   HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her late-husband’s records be corrected to entitle her to  a  Survivor
Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She had only been married for three months when her  husband  retired.
She was never informed of any options regarding  SBP.   Just  recently
she was made aware of SBP upon her  husband's  death.   The  applicant
does not recall signing any documents and she was  not  aware  of  the
government newsletter until about one-year ago.  She was asked to sign
a form without any explanation.

Applicant's complete submission,  with  attachments,  is  attached  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from  the
deceased member’s  military  records,  are  contained  in  the  letter
prepared by the appropriate  office  of  the  Air  Force  attached  at
Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPTR  states   Public  Law  (PL)  99-145,  established  on 8 Nov
85, required as of 1 Mar 86 spousal concurrence of the  SBP  election,
if the election was providing less than maximum spouse coverage.  If a
spouse nonconcurred on the SBP election, coverage would be established
on the spouse's behalf by operation  of  law.   If  the  servicemember
declined to elect coverage for an eligible
spouse, coverage cannot be established in the future except during  an
authorized open enrollment period.

The servicemember and the applicant were married on  13  Nov  87.   He
declined SBP coverage prior to his 1 Apr 88 retirement.   The  records
maintained by the Finance center indicate the applicant concurred with
the servicemember's election.  The servicemember had  the  opportunity
during two open enrollments to elect coverage.   The open  enrollments
were authorized by PLs 101-89 (1 Apr 92 - 31 Mar 93), and  105-261  (1
Mar 99 - 29 Feb 00).  Each servicemember was notified by  direct  mail
of the opportunity to enroll during the open enrollment periods.  Also
the Afterburner, USAF News for  Retired  Personnel,  published  during
these  timeframes  was  forwarded  to  the   servicemember's   address
maintained by the finance center.  The Afterburner contained points of
contacts to obtain additional information regarding SBP.  There is  no
evidence that the servicemember made an election for  spouse  coverage
during either open enrollment period.  The servicemember  died  on  20
Jan 02.  Based on the information  provided  and  the  servicemember's
records, DPPTR recommends denying the requested relief.

A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the
applicant on 10 May 02, for review and response.  As of this date,  no
response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant’s complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of  the  Air
Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our  conclusion  that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or  injustice.   The
records maintained by the Finance Center have an annotation indicating
the applicant concurred with the servicemember's decision  to  decline
coverage under SBP.   The  servicemember  could  have  elected  spouse
coverage for the applicant during the 1 Apr 92 - 31 Mar 93 or 1 Mar 00
- 29 Feb 00 open enrollments but failed to do so.  Therefore,  in  the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no  compelling  basis  to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
00874 in Executive Session on 16 August 2002, under the provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

                       Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Chair
                       Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Member
                       Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Feb 02, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPTR, dated 24 Apr 02.
      Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 May 02.




                             BARBARA A. WESTGATE
                             Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9900488

    Original file (9900488.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 Jun 73, the deceased member submitted an SBP election statement during the initial enrollment period, declining coverage. Public Law (PL) 92-425, which established SBP on 21 Sep 72, authorized an 18-month enrollment period for retired members to elect SBP coverage. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that her late husband’s records should be corrected to show that he elected SBP coverage for her.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200517

    Original file (0200517.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There were no provisions in the law at that time to notify spouses if the servicemember did not elect coverage. There is no evidence that the servicemember elected SBP during any of the authorized open enrollments. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Apr 02.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0201563

    Original file (0201563.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Even though the applicant and the decedent were married at the time of his retirement (1 Apr 91), records indicate that the applicant’s valid concurrence in the decedent’s SBP election was obtained prior to his retirement. Subsequently, the decedent was eligible to provide coverage for the applicant during two SBP open enrollment periods authorized by Public Laws (PLs) 101-189 and 105-126 (1 Apr 92 – 31 Mar 93 and 1 Mar 99 – 29 Feb 00, respectively). We took notice of the applicant's...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9803442

    Original file (9803442.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence also establishes the deceased member’s efforts to provide the applicant with all the benefits she was entitled to as the spouse of a retired service member. Microfiche records verify SBP enrollment packets and newsletters were mailed to the address the decedent provided to the finance center during the 1981-1982 and 1992-1993 open enrollment periods. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01037

    Original file (BC-2002-01037.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR states Public Law (PL) 99-145, established on 8 November 1985, required as of 1 March 1986 spousal concurrence of the SBP election, if the election was providing less than maximum spouse coverage. According to the Defense Finance and Service - Cleveland Center (DAFS- CL) the servicemember elected full spouse and child coverage under SBP, but later submitted a corrected election to decline SBP...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00667

    Original file (BC-2002-00667.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the very least the retiree should be given the opportunity to accept or decline further SBP enrollment when the new spouse is enrolled in DEERS. In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a letter from his spouse, his retiree account statements (dated 11 and 24 January 2002), and a letter from DFAS. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION: Through his member of Congress, applicant provided a personal statement,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9800419

    Original file (9800419.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Retiree Services Branch, AFPC/DPPTR, reviewed this application and states Public Law (PL) 99-145 (8 Nov 85 but effective 1 Mar 86) requires a spouse’s written concurrence be obtained whenever a married retiree elects less than full spouse SBP coverage. DPPTR further states that the applicant’s claim that her husband declined SBP coverage because he believed his retired pay would be offset by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00419

    Original file (BC-1998-00419.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Retiree Services Branch, AFPC/DPPTR, reviewed this application and states Public Law (PL) 99-145 (8 Nov 85 but effective 1 Mar 86) requires a spouse’s written concurrence be obtained whenever a married retiree elects less than full spouse SBP coverage. DPPTR further states that the applicant’s claim that her husband declined SBP coverage because he believed his retired pay would be offset by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200667

    Original file (0200667.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the very least the retiree should be given the opportunity to accept or decline further SBP enrollment when the new spouse is enrolled in DEERS. In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a letter from his spouse, his retiree account statements (dated 11 and 24 January 2002), and a letter from DFAS. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION: Through his member of Congress, applicant provided a personal statement,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0202706

    Original file (0202706.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    They stated the laws controlling the SBP preclude a married member, who declined spouse coverage at the time of retirement, from providing SBP former spouse coverage following divorce unless Congress authorizes an open enrollment. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt...