RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00900
INDEX CODES: A73.00, 100.06
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be
upgraded and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the
letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of
Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS reviewed this application and recommended denial.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAE reviewed this application and indicated that the RE code of
2B (“separated with a general or under-other-than-honorable-conditions
discharge) is correct (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and furnished a response which
is attached at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After careful consideration of
applicant's requests and the available evidence of record, we find
insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective
action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear
to be based on the evidence of record and have not been adequately
rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was
denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not
followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis
to disturb the existing record.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
00900 in Executive Session on 14 Aug 02, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr., Panel Chair
Mr. Thomas J. Topolski, Jr., Member
Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Feb 02, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 4 Apr 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 18 Jun 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Jun 02.
Exhibit F. Letter, applicant, dated 4 Jul 02, w/atchs.
ALBERT F. LOWAS, JR.
Panel Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00236 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00129 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge code be changed. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantiive requirements of...
The military mental health providers had followed the applicant for several months and were fully aware of his pattern of behavior over a prolonged period of time and were thus able to confidently make the diagnosis of personality disorder. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 21 June 2002, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02030
On 25 March 2002, the applicant's commander notified him that he was being discharged for mental disorders, specifically a personality disorder. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE indicates that based on the review of his case file, his RE code 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” is correct. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01755 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be given a higher Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) entitlement. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE states that the applicant received the multiple that was in effect...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-03419
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03419 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The separation code of KBK on his DD Form 214 and reflected in the personnel system be changed to MBK _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: After his separation from active duty on 28 January 2001, he...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02443
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02443 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His entry-level separation be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 25 Jun 02, applicant received an uncharacterized entry-level separation, by reason of “Entry Level Performance and Conduct,” and was issued an RE code of 2C...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01902
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his discharge separation and reenlistment code should be changed. We therefore agree with the recommendations of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden that he has suffered either an error or an injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01422
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant states that an entry level separation does not attempt to characterize the type of service as either good or bad. In order for a member discharged by entry level separation to receive an honorable characterization, there must be unusual circumstantces of personal conduce and performance of military duty that warrants consideration by the Secretary of the Air Force. Therefore,...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant states that an entry level separation does not attempt to characterize the type of service as either good or bad. In order for a member discharged by entry level separation to receive an honorable characterization, there must be unusual circumstantces of personal conduce and performance of military duty that warrants consideration by the Secretary of the Air Force. Therefore,...