RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00849
INDEX CODE: 111.01
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Education/Training Report (TR), rendered for the period 2 Jun 92
through 27 Sep 93, be replaced with the revised TR provided, which
include squadron commander comments on his performance as a flight
commander.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His performance as a flight commander is not documented on any
training reports or Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) due to an
oversight during the base closure process at George AFB, CA.
In support of his request, applicant submits a copy of an AF Form 77
(Supplemental Evaluation Sheet), rendered for the period 2 Jun 92
through 20 Aug 92, and a revised TR. The applicant’s complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 1 Jun 83, the applicant was commissioned a second lieutenant in the
Regular Air Force. He was progressively promoted to the grade of
lieutenant colonel, effective and with a date of rank of 1 Oct 99.
Applicant's profile for the last 10 reporting periods follows:
Period Ending Evaluation
20 Nov 91 Meets Standards (MS) - Captain
# 1 Jun 92 MS
* ## 27 Sep 93 Education/Training Report (TR)
### 8 Jun 94 TR
8 Jun 95 MS - Major
4 May 96 MS
+ 6 Jun 97 TR
++ 6 Jun 98 MS
6 Jun 99 MS
14 May 00 MS - Lt Col
* Contested TR
# Top report at the time he was considered and nonselected for
promotion Below-the-Promotion Zone (BPZ) to major by the CY92C Central
Major Selection Board, which convened on 7 Dec 92.
## Top report at the time he was considered and nonselected for
promotion Below-the-Promotion Zone (BPZ) to major by the CY93B Central
Major Selection Board, which convened on 6 Dec 93.
### Top report at the time he was considered and selected for
promotion In-the-Promotion Zone (IPZ) to major by the CY94A Central
Major Selection Board, which convened on 22 Aug 94.
+ Top report at the time he was considered and nonselected for
promotion to lieutenant colonel by the CY97C and CY98B Central
Lieutenant Colonel Selection Boards, which convened on 21 Jul 97 and 1
Jun 98 respectively.
++ Top report at the time he was considered and selected for promotion
to lieutenant colonel by the CY99A Central Lieutenant Colonel
Selection Board, which convened on 19 Apr 99.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPPE recommends the application be denied. DPPPE stated that
the proposed Training Report (TR) does not mention the applicant
performing as a flight commander, but embellishes on information
previously addressed. Based on the comments in Section III, Other
Comments, of the contested TR, the rater did obtain information about
the previous assignment and it was considered when making the initial
assessment and commented upon in the TR. The retrospective views of
facts and circumstances, 7 years after the closeout of the AF Form 77,
Letter of Evaluation, do not overcome the presumption that the
original TR is correct and do not add new information that was not
previously known or addressed in previous evaluation reports. The HQ
AFPC/DPPPE evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on
19 April 2002 for review and response. As of this date, no response
has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case.
However, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as
the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain
his burden that he has suffered either an error or an injustice. In
view of the above and absent sufficient evidence to the contrary, we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 5 June 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Vice Chair
Mr. John B. Hennessey, Member
Mr. Michael Maglio, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Feb 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPE, dated 10 Apr 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Apr 02.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Vice Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02040 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 16th AF Intel Officer of the Year 1990 award comments contained in his 19 Jun 92 Training Report (TR) be removed and added to his 4 Mar 91 Officer Performance Report (OPR), and he receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03931
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03931 INDEX CODE: 111.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The duty title on his Officer Performance Report (OPR), rendered for the period 17 May 01 through 16 May 02, be corrected to read “Bioenvironmental Engineering Flight Commander” rather than “Bioenvironmental Engineer”; and, that he...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03569 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of major by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY96A (4 Mar 96) Major Selection Board (P0496A), with inclusion of the corrected Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) provided; the citations...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-02883
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02883 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Professional Military Education (PME) recommendations on his Officer Performance Reports (OPRs), closing 19 Mar 94 and 25 Nov 94, be changed from Intermediate Service School (ISS) to Senior Service School (SSS). The...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01894
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01894 (Case 2) INDEX CODE: 131.00, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Referral Officer Performance Report (OPR), rendered for the period 5 July 1990 through 4 January 1991, be declared void and removed from her records. Prior to the applicant’s break in service, during the period...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2001-03039
On 15 Sep 99, applicant was notified of his commander's intent to impose nonjudicial punishment on him under Article 15, UCMJ. JAJM stated that a set aside should only be granted when the evidence demonstrates an error or a clear injustice. A complete copy of this evaluation is appended at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPASC states that, if and only if, the applicant’s request is approved, they would recommend removal of the job entry titled, “Commander, HQ Squadron Section” from his duty history and...
Rather, the PRF is a reflection of the senior rater’s opinion of whether the applicant was ready at that time for promotion. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the advisory opinions and furnished a response which is attached at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00890
His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for consideration by the Calendar Year 1999B Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board be voided and replaced with a reaccomplished PRF. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and furnished a detailed response and additional documentary evidence which are attached...
He also believes he may have been nonselected because of a perception among the board members that he spent too much time at Kirtland AFB, NM. DPPPA stated that it was the applicant’s responsibility to notify the board of the circumstances surrounding his extended tenure at one location, and the omission of the duty title effective 18 Dec 93 from his OSB if he believed them important to his promotion consideration. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02881
He is currently serving on active duty in the grade of lieutenant colonel, with an effective date and date of rank of 1 February 2002, having been selected for promotion to that grade by the CY00A selection board. In view of the statements provided by the evaluators of the contested report, and having no basis to question their integrity, we conclude that the applicant’s records should be corrected to substitute the reaccomplished OPR, closing 26 May 1999, for the one currently in his...