RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00837
INDEX CODE: 112.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His separation code and Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letters prepared by
the appropriate offices of the Air Force (Exhibit C & D).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRSP recommended denial. They indicated that the applicant was
separated under a strength reduction program. He received a
reenlistment code of “2X - First-term, second-term, or career airman
considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP.” Since
the member was not reenlistment eligible, he was discharged for
strength reduction. His separation code and narrative reason for
separation would not be a reason for the member to be denied reentry
into the military.
Based upon the documentation in the file, they believe the discharge
was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the
discharge regulation. Additionally, the discharge was within the
sound discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant did not
submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that
occurred in the discharge processing. Additionally, he provided no
facts warranting a change in his separation code.
The evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAE recommended denial. They indicated that the applicant
separated 2 January 1990, after serving 3 years, 6 months, and 1 day
active service. The Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2X, “First-
term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for
reenlistment under SRP” is correct.
The evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 19 July 2002, copies of the evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant for review and response within thirty (30) days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of substantial evidence to the contrary, we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
00837 in Executive Session on 28 August 2002, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
Mr. Frederick R. Beaman III, Member
Ms. Cheryl Dare, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 March 2002.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRSP, dated 4 April 2002.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 24 June 2002.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 July 2002.
ROSCOE HINTON, JR.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03701
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03701 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to show a favorable discharge and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code and to either be compensated monetarily or be credited for 20 years of service. ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02924 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that he may reenlist in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 9 January...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03256
Therefore, we have no basis to conclude that the corresponding RE code that was assigned at the time of his separation does not accurately reflect the circumstances of his separation. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03330
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03330 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. However, the code he received had its basis in his nonselection for reenlistment. We therefore agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02137
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 21 Nov 03 for review and response. No evidence has been provided which would lead us to believe that the applicant’s evaluators were unable to render an unbiased evaluation of his performance or that the ratings on the contested report were based on...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02572 INDEX CODE: 100.03 HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed so that he may reenlist. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01193
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01193 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2X” be changed. The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03532 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code be changed to allow him to enlist in the Mississippi Air National Guard. Applicant's EPR profile reflects the following: PERIOD ENDING OVERALL EVALUATION 17 Dec 95 2 2 Aug 96...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01902
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his discharge separation and reenlistment code should be changed. We therefore agree with the recommendations of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden that he has suffered either an error or an injustice.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00095 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code of 2x “first-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to a code that will permit him to reenter...