RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00838
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an
honorable discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommended denial. They indicated that based upon the
documentation in the file, they believe the discharge was consistent
with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge
regulation at that time. Additionally, the discharge was within the
sound discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant did not
submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that
occurred in the discharge processing. He provided no facts warranting
an upgrade of his discharge.
The evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 10 May 2002, a copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response within thirty (30) days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
00838 in Executive Session on 9 July 2002, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Panel Chair
Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
Mr. Michael Maglio, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 April 2002, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 26 April 2002.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 May 2002.
VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ
Panel Chair
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C). The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) package shows that the applicant requested a discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. _________________________________________________________________ The following...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C). Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to her discharge are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied. As of this date, this office has received no response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
A complete copy of the Air Staff evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states the incident on the FBI report is correct, but he has since that time earned his Master's and Journeyman's license in plumbing. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 26 Jan 89. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states the applicant has not submitted any evidence nor identified any errors or injustices that occurred in the processing of his discharge. A complete...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR states the applicant has not submitted any documentation to substantiate that he was an aircrew member or that he flew in any combat mission or had any direct involvement with any mission in support of Vietnam. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. The applicant has not...
HQ AFPC/DPSAMP completed the AF Form 281 to change his name on the Air Force file for any contact purpose. The DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, is only used to correct an error on the DD Form 214 if it was in error at the time of discharge. He provided several documents to substantiate his claim of the correct spelling of his name.
His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) indicated he was board certified and his Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) had an overall recommendation of “Promote.” He was also considered but not selected by the CY02A board. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPPO concurs with DPMAF2’s findings, has nothing to add and recommends SSB consideration be denied. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01351
He received a letter of counseling (LOC) on 17 October 2001 for being late for duty. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are not persuaded that his contention of no longer being affected by “previous flaws”, in and by themselves, are sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided by the Air Force. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 8 May 03.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00737 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). In response, he provided a letter that is appended at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...