4
t,
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY REC
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01374
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from
Middletown, Maryland, to St. Mary's, Pennsylvania. Applicant's
submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory bpinion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Henry C. Saunders, Mr. Henry Romo, Jr. ,
and Dr. Gerald B. Kauvar considered this application on
17 November 1998 in accordance with the
Instruction 36-2603, and the governing
Exhibits :
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C . Advisory Opinion
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
P
DEPARTMENT OF T H E A I R FORCE
H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPCDPPAE
550 C Street West, Ste 10
Randolph AFB TX 78 1 50-47 12
The applicant requests her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Middletown MD to
St. Mary’s PA. Her contention is that her recent marriage is sufficient reason to justify changing
her HOR address to St Mary’s PA, the HOR of her husband. Applicant filed a timely request
within three years of discovering the alleged injustice.
HOR is defined as the place recorded as the home of the individual when commissioned,
enlisted, or ordered into the relevant tour of active duty. It is recorded in the military personnel
record for the sole purpose of determining transportation entitlements upon separation, or those of
dependents in the event of a member’s death while on active duty. While legal addresses may
change from time to time during a member’s career, HOR remains constant. HOR can be changed
only if there has been a break in service of one full day or a bona fide error was made in recording
information given by member. The HOR must be the actual home of the member upon entering
the service, and not a different place selected for the member’s convenience. As information,
upon retirement, travel and transportation entitlements are to Home of Selection, not HOR.
Applicant has provided no documentation that shows St Mary’s PA as her home address at
the time of enlistment or when ordered to active duty. We recommend denial of request. POC is
MSgt Lopez, DSN 587-2068.
Chief, Skills Maf&nent Branch
Dir of Personnel rograms Management
STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Skills Management Branch, AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed this application and indicated that HOR is defined as the place recorded as the home of the individual when commissioned, It enlisted, is recorded in the military personnel record for the sole purpose of...
As a result, we recommend denial of the 8.. OGAN,C t,USAF Chief, Skills c \ DEPARTMENT O F THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM HQ AFPC/JA (Maj Reed) 550 C Street West Ste 44 Randolph AFB TX 78 150-4746 SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Records - c 30 January 1998 - REOUESTED ACTION: ADDlicantmxmests that her home of record OKOR) be changed fro BASIS FOR REQUEST: Applicant believes that it is an...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00304
The records indicated the applicant received an Under Honorable Conditions (General) discharge from the Pennsylvania Air National Guard for admitting under oath to numerous violations of the travel regulations which includcd falsifying receipts and submitting fraudulent travel vouchers. Applicant's Issues. About a month later, in February 2004,i was told tbat the commander directed an investigation on my travel voucher I submitted ia November 2004.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03986
According to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, associated with her 13 Jul 03 release from active duty, her HOR at time of entry is listed as 36707 San Pedro Dr., Apt 120, Fremont, CA 94536. The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant submitted a response stating when she was in contact with her recruiter she was a full-time out-of-state student at Alliant International University in California. ...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit D. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. i - - 550 C Street West, Suite 14 Randolph AFB TX 78150-4716 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. E. Applicant's Response AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINOTON, DC 22 November 1996 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ USAF/DPXFC 1040 Air Force Pentagon Washington DC 20330-1040 ction of Military...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Implementation Guidance dated 7 Mar 96, stipulated that members eligible for SGLI under section 1967 (a)(l)-(2) of title 38, United States Code, on 31 Mar 96 with continued eligibility on 1 Apr 96, would have their SGLI increased to $200,000 effective 1 Apr 96, regardless of any prior election. Members who failed to complete the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00367
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00367 IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to El Paso TX. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial of the applicant's request to change her HOR from Philadelphia, PA to EL...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000407
b. the FSM was a member of Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade and was killed in action in the Republic of Vietnam on 19 November 1967. c. he would like the FSM's DA Form 52-2 (Report of Casualty) corrected by changing the entry stating "Home of Record Middletown, Rhode Island" to read "Home of Record Brunswick, Maine." i. when the traveling Vietnam Wall came to Brunswick and the family went to view it, the FSM's name was...
98-00223 AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Deputy Director of Customer Assistance, ARPC/DR, reviewed this application and states that the member states that when he received the RCSBP information it was close to his Continuous Active Military Service Date and he incorrectly interpreted the suspense date to be 90 days from that date. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the...