AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RE
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
APPLICANT REOUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2H and general
discharge be upgraded.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: .
He was young and immature and his personal problems impaired his
ability to serve.
He was discharged for failure to finish
alcohol rehabilitation due to two related incidents of alcohol
which occurred off base. His discharge was too harsh compared to
today's standards.
In support of his request, applicant submits personal letters,
character reference letters and additional documents associated
with the issues cited in his contentions (Exhibit A).
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 13 August 1992 for
a period of 4 years. He was progressively promoted to the grade
of airman (E-21, effective 13 February 1993.
On 23 April 1993, applicant received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR)
for underage drinking on 18 April 1993.
On 6 may 1993, the applicant was entered in Track 4 of the
Substance Abuse Reorientation and Treatment Program.
On 22 September 1993, applicant was notified of his commander's
intent to impose nonjudicial punishment on him under Article 15,
UCMJ.
The misconduct applicant had allegedly committed was
wrongful consumption of alcoholic beverages while under the age
of 21, on or about 15 September 1993, in violation of Article
134, UCMJ. The applicant consulted a lawyer, waived his right to
demand trial by court-martial and accepted nonjudicial
punishment. After considering all matters presented to him, the
commander found that the applicant did commit one or more of the
The commander imposed punishment of a
offenses alleged.
suspended reduction to the grade of airman basic, forfeiture of
$100 of pay per month for 2 months and 15 days of extra duty.
Applicant did not appeal the punishment.
On 30 September 1993, the applicant declined any further group,
education or contact from the Social Actions Office. He was
officially removed from Track 4 for program failure and entered
into Track 5 of the Substance Abuse Reorientation and Treatment
Program on 30 September 1993.
On 21 October 1993, applicant was notified that his commander was
recommending he be discharged with a general (under honorable
conditions) discharge because of failure in alcohol abuse
rehabilitation. After consulting counsel, applicant submitted a
statement in his own behalf requesting an honorable discharge.
The wing staff judge advocate reviewed the case file and found it
legally sufficient. The recommended separation was approved by
the discharge authority and, on 27 October 1993, the applicant
received a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge under
the provisions of AFR 39"-10 (Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure). He
had completed 1 year, 2 months and 15 days and was serving in the
grade of airman (E-2) at the time of discharge. He received an
RE Code of 2H, which defined means "Participating in Track 4 or 5
of the Substance Abuse Reorientation and Treatment (SART) program
for alcohol, or has failed to complete Track 4 " .
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant's request for upgrade of his discharge to honorable was
denied by the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) on 1 April
A copy of the AFDRB Hearing Record is appended at
1998.
Exhibit C.
The Special Programs and BCMR Manager, HQ AFPC/DPPAES, stated
that the RE Code of 2H is correct. The type of discharge drove
assignment of the RE code (Exhibit D).
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the AFDRB Hearing Record and Air Force evaluation were
forwarded to applicant on 13 May 1998 for review and response.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit E).
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2
98- 01301
2. The application was timely filed.
3 . Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice. We
find no impropriety in the characterization of applicant's
discharge.
It appears that responsible officials applied
appropriate standards in affecting the separation, and we do not
find persuasive evidence that pertinent regulations were violated
or that applicant was not afforded all the rights to which
entitled at the time of discharge. In this respect, we note that
the applicant's discharge for failure in the alcohol abuse
rehabilitation program was the result of his own action to
decline any further group, education or contact from the Social
Actions off ice.
Consequently, the reason for applicant's
discharge correlates to the 2H reenlistment eligibility (RE) code
he received. No evidence has been provided that he completed the
program prior to his separation. We therefore conclude that the
discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the
discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances. As to
the assertion that his discharge was too harsh compared with
today's standards, we agree with the Air Force Discharge Review
Board (AFDRB) that refusal to complete rehabilitation provides a
proper basis for a less than fully honorable discharge. Although
the applicant provided documentation regarding his post-service
activities and accomplishments, we find this information to be of
limited scope.
In addition, we note that it has only been
approximately five years since his discharge. Hence, we do not
consider the passage of time sufficiently lengthy to support
favorably considering clemency in the form of an upgraded
discharge at this time. In view of the foregoing and absent
persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis
to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s)
involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice; that the application was denied without a personal
appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered
upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 15 September 1998, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
3
98-01301
Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Panel Chair
Mr. Allen Beckett, Member
Mr. Henry Romo Jr., Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Oct 9 7 , w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C . AFDRB Hearing Record, dated 1 Apr 98
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAES, dated 12 May 98.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 13 May 9 8 .
BARBARA A. W E S T G ~ E
Panel Chair
.
4
98-01301
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R FORCE
H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E T E X A S
1 2 MAY 1998
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPC/DPPAES
550 C Street West Ste 10
Randolph AFB TX 78 150-471 2
SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Record
~
We conducted a review of applicant’s case file. The Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code
“2H’ is correct. The type of discharge drove assignment of the RE code.
Special Programs and BCMR Manager
Dir of Personnel Program Management
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
E'D-98-00017
(Former AMN)
1 . MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 9 3 / 1 0 / 2 7 UP AFR 39-10,
para 5-32 (Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure). Appeals for Honorable Disch.
2 . BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 7 4 / 0 1 / 0 3 .
AFQT: N/A M-85, A-79,
Dispatcher. DAS: 9 2 / 1 0 / 2 8 .
Enlmt Age: 18 5 / 1 2 .
G-37,
Disch Age: 1 9 9 / 1 2 . Educ: HS DIPL.
E-62. PAFSC: 60330 - Apprentice Vehicle Operator
b. Prior Sv: AFRes 9 2 / 0 6 / 1 2 - 9 2 / 0 8 / 1 3
( 2 months 1 day)(Inactive)
3 . SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enld as: AB 9 2 / 0 8 / 1 3 for ( 4 ) Yrs. Svd: 1 Yrs 2 Mo 1 5 Das, all AMs.
b. Grade Status: AMN - 9 3 / 0 2 / 1 3
c. Time Lost: none.
d. Art 1 5 ' s :
(1) 93/09/24, Elmendorf AFB, AK - Yo1 did, o/a 15 Sep 93,
wrongfully consume alcoholic beverages while under the
age of 21 in violation of Alaska Statute Section
04.16.050, as made applicable by the Federal
Assimilative Crimes Act 18 U.S.C. 1 3 . Rdn to AB (susp
til 23 Mar 941, forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month for
two months, and fifteen days extra duties. (No
appeal) (No mitigation).
I
e. CM: none.
f. Record of SV: none.
(Discharged from Elmendorf AFB)
g . Awards & Decs: AFTR, NDSM.
h. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (1) Yrs ( 4 ) Mos ( 1 5 ) Das
TAMS: (1) Yrs ( 2 ) Mos ( 1 5 ) Das
4 . BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fin 2 9 3 ) dtd 97/10/21.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF
ATCHS
1. Applicant's Issues.
2. Applicant's Letter to DRB.
3. Letter to Senator.
4. Letter to Congressman.
5. Two Letters of Recommendation.
6. Resume.
7. Letter from NPRC.
8. DD Form 214.
9. DD Form 149.
98/01/08/ia
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
FD98-00017
(Former AMN)
S U P P L E M E N T A L
The following was rec’d in AFDRB, 98/02/05:
1. Resume
2. Air Force Discharge Review Board Notice w/3 Atchs
3. Letter to President, January 27, 1998
4. Letter to Senator, January 25, 1998
5. Letter to Congressman, January 25, 1998 w/l Atch
6. Letter to Board for Correction of Air Force Records, RE: Discharge Upgrade November 6, 1997
7. Letter to Board for Correction of Air Force Records, RE: Discharge upgrade/DD form 293,
November 6, 1997
8. Letter to U. S. Senator, November 8, 1997
9. Letter to congressman, November 8, 1997
10. Cy of SAFMIBR Letter w/2 Atchs
1 1. Letter from National Personnel Records Center, Apr 25 1997
98/02/1 O/les
FROM: 3 TRNSS/CC
21900 2nd St
Elmendorf AFB AK 99506-3385
SUBJ: Notification Letter
TO :
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for
failure in alcohol abuse rehabilitation. The authority for this action is AFR
39-10, Section F, paragraph 5-32. If my recommendation is approved, your
service will be characterized as honorable or general. I am recommending that
your service be characterized as general.
2. My reasons for this action are:
a. On 18 Apr 93, you were found under the influence of alcohol. You were
also in violation of Article 92 by failing to obey a lawful general regulation
punishable under the UCMJ as evidenced by a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), 23 Apr
93 (Atch 1).
b. On 6 May 93, you were entered in Track 4 of the Substance Abuse
Reorientation and Treatment Program as evidenced by AF Form 2731, date
annotated 6 May 93 (Atch 2) and AF Form 2745, dated 6 May 93 (Atch 3).
c. On 12 Aug 93, your counselor noted that your participation was
minimal, that you didn't attend AA as required and that once you were sent
back to your First Sergeant for refusing to do an aesignment.
handed in your homework assignments late. This is evidenced by AF Form 2745
dated 12 Aug 93 (Atch 4).
Also, you
d. On or about 15 Sep 93, you wrongfully consumed alcoholic beverages
while under the age of 21. For this offense, you were reduced to the grade of
airman basic (euspended), forfeited $100 pay per month for two months and were
required to perform 15 days extra duty as evidenced by an Article 15, dtd
24 Sep 93 (Atch 5).
e. On 30 Sep 93, you declined any further group, education or contact
from the Social Actions Office as evidenced by AF Form 2746, Substance Abuse
Reorientation and Treatment Program Case Notes (Atch 6). Also, on 30 Sep 93,
a Commander's Decision or Intervention Meeting Review (AF Form 2745) was held.
On the reverse side of the AF Form 2745, you comaented on not wanting to go to
group and that you would go to AA on your own as evidenced by AF Form 2745
(Atch 7). Additionally, on 30 Sep 93, you were officially removed from
Track 4 for program failure and entered into Track 5 of the Substance Abuse
Reorientation and Treatment Program as evidenced by AF Form 2731, annotated on
30 Sep 93 (see Atch 2).
Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in
support of this recommendation are attached. The commander exercising SPcM
jurisdiction or a higher authority will decide whether you will be discharged
or retained in the Air Force; and, if you are discharged, how your service
will be characterized. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible for
reenlistment in the Air Force.
3. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel has been
obtained to assist you. I have made an appointment for you to consult Capt
w , -,
You may consult civilian counsel at your own expense.
a / O& 9 3 a t
at Bldg 6-920, Rm 330 on
t+oO
4. You have the right to submit statement in your own behalf. Any statements
you want the separation authority to consider must reach me by
unless you request and receive an extension for good cause show*ill
them to the separation authority.
send
5. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit Statements in your own behalf,
your failure will constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
6. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to 3rd
Aerospace Medicine Squadron, Building 24-850 at 0715 on 2% o& 93 .
(Fast (drink water only) for 14 hours prior, no alcohol 72 hours prior, no
tobacco products 6 hours prior to examination, bring eyeglasses, and contact
solution if using contacts. You must be in uniform for the examination.)
7. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy
Act Statement as explained in AFR 39-10, Attachment 2. A copy of AFR 39-10 is
available for your use at your Squadron Orderly Room.
commander
USAF
7 Atchs
1. LOR, 23 Apr 93 w/l Atch
2. AF Form 2731
3. AF Form 2745, 6 May 93
4. AF Form 2145, 12 Aug 93
5. Article 15 w/8 Atch
6. AF Form 2746, 30 Sep 93
7. AF Form 2745, 30 Sep 93
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00825
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommended applicant’s request be denied. They also noted applicant did not submit any evidence or facts warranting a change to his separation code or reenlistment eligibility code. At the time a member is separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE Code predicated upon the quality of their service and the circumstances of their separation.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00167
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN Alc PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ~ COUNSEL :- : YES | NO xX [ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTE. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0167 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In addition, he received three Letters of Reprimand and two Records of Individual...
When it was time for him to go on terminal leave, he had one final team meeting to discuss his progress with his supervisor, counselor, first sergeant, commander, and the officer overseeing the SART program. After a thorough review of the available records, we found no evidence that the RE code assigned at the time of applicant’s separation was in error or contrary to the governing regulation. Accordingly, we recommend that the records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02290
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial indicating that individuals who have been entered into an alcohol rehabilitation and treatment program, then either fails to complete the program or demonstrates evidence of recurrent use of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03685
DPSOA cannot support the applicants request since he has failed to provide sufficient evidence that calls for a change in his RE code. The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00394
Additionally, member had an Article 15 for making a false official statement to a military police officer, and a vacation of his suspended reduction for two incidents of failure to go. At the time of the discharge, member consulted counsel and submitted a statement agreeing with the discharge action but criticizing the treatment program and requesting his service be characterized as honorable. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enld as AB 16 Nov 94 for 4 yrs.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions d+L@+ VAUGH E. SCHLUNZ Panel Chair V MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: BCMR Medical Consultant 1535 Command Drive, EE Wing, 3rd Floor Andrews AFB MD 20762-7002 14 April 1998 98-00580 P * REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant was discharged after...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02810 INDEX 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1996 general discharge be upgraded to honorable so he can join the Air National Guard or the Reserves. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: After a personal hearing on 3 September 1998,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02923
On 14 September 1993, she was notified by her commander that she was being recommended for discharge due to failure in alcohol abuse rehabilitation. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that getting out of the Air Force was one of the biggest mistakes she has made. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03271
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 14 December 1984 in the grade of airman basic. He had not completed the program at the time of his discharge from active duty. The evidence of record indicates the applicant had been entered into the Alcohol Rehabilitation program and had not completed the program at the time of his separation.