AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect
service in Vietnam and award of all decorations to which he is
entitled. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request
and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on
the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The 'Board staff is'directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Henry C. Saunders, Ms. Ann L. Heidig,
and Ms. Sophie A. Clark considered this application on 10 Dec 98
in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-
2603 and the governing statute, 10 U . S . C . 1552. /
/
Y C. SAUNDERS
Exhibits :
A . Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinions
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions
D E P A R T M E N T OF THE A I R FORCE
H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FQRCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E T E X A S
--
21 August 1998
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPC/DPAPPl
550 C Street West, Ste 32
Randolph AFB TX 78 150-4734
SUBJECT:
Reco
Requested Action: The applicant is requesting his military record be corrected to show
that he performed TDY’s to Vietnam during 1969/70 while assigned to Clark Air Base,
Philippines.
have a
s he wants this for personal satisfaction and to
am..
Background: During our review we were unable to locate any documents that indicated
to review his personal file for documents that we
TDYs to Vietnam. We asked
might use to verify TDYs to Vietnam. He did not respond to our requests; therefore, we assume
he has no additional documents we can use support his request.
Facts: His records reflect he had one overseas tour to duty (Clark AB, PI, 22Jun69-
22Dec70).
Recommendation: Request be denied no available source documents to veri@ TDYs.
WILLIAMB. WARD
Assignment Advisor
Directorate of Assignments
I
A
DEPARTMENT O F T H E A I R FORCE
‘
.
H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H AIR F O R C E B A S E TEXAS
MEMORANDUM~OR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPCDPPPRA
550 C Street West Ste 12
Randolph AFB TX 78150-4714
25 August 1998
rG; (DD Form
49)
I,
1. REQUESTED ACTION. Applicant requests “to see Vietnam vet on my paperwork, with up-
dates on all decorations I am entitled to.”
2. BASIS FOR REQUEST. Applicant served overseas at Clark AB Philippines, saying he “was
in direct mission support.”
3. FACTS.
0
a. Applicant served on Active Duty 3 Oct 68-7 Jul72, with an overseas tour at Clark AB 22
Jun 69-22 Dec 70. He received the National Defense Service Medal, Small A r m s Expert
Marksmanship Ribbon, and Air Force Good Conduct Medal.
b. None of the units to which the applicant was assigned earned any unit awards while he
was assigned to them. He is not eligible for, or entitled to, any unit awards.
c. There is no indication the applicant served in Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia or Thailand dur-
ing his service. He failed to respond to a request for documentation to substantiate his claims.
He is not eligible for, or entitled to, any additional individual awards or decorations, especially
those pertaining to service in Vietnam.
4. DISCUSSION. Since the applicant did not provide any documentation to substantiate his
claims, and there is nothing in his records, we can not verify his eligibility for any additional unit
or individual awards or decorations.
5. RECOMMENDATION.
c
We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request to have his records reflect “Vietnam
vet” and any additional awards or decorations.
FOR THE COMMANDER && --
1
GEORGK A.%SE, DAFC
Recognition Programs Branch
Promotions, Eva1 & Recognition Div
The appropriate Air Force off ice evaluated applicant I s request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit D). Applicant requests DD Form 214 reflect his Vietnam Service by adding the Vietnam Service Medal and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinions D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions E. Applicant’s Response D E P A R T M E N T OF T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E TEXAS AUG 3 11998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS 550 C...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant f o r review and response (Exhibit D). Enlistment grades were determined by the N P S grade policy and DOR was the date of enlistment in the Regular Air Force.
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-01852 COUNSEL : HEARING DESIRED: NO FFB ' 9 l99F I Applicant requests that his DD Form 214 be amended to reflect the country at the end of each overseas tour ribbon. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the The advisory opinion was application be denied (Exhibit C ) . Applicant requests his DD Form 2 14...
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. Asia Service request The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant requests award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal. The applicant’s records do not contain any documents showing he was in the 0 consecutive days [TDYJ, and he did not provide any, even when requested to ut documentation showing he was in the Area of Responsibility for...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Applicant’s master personnel record does not contain the discharge case file however, his DD Form 2 14 indicates his discharge was for misconduct- sexual deviation. Applicant did not identi@ any specific errors in the discharge processing nor provide facts which warrant an upgrade of the discharge he received over 15 years ago and...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01806 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO Form 214 (Certificate of be corrected to show his listed and the Vietnam Release Vietnam Service Applicant requests that his DD or Discharge From Active Duty) service dates and all schools Medal. The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board- -recommending the application be denied...
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. code be The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. Based on the above, we recommend denial of applicant’s request for correction of RE code.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97-00744 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: rtment of the Air Force be corrected to show that on 4 November 1996, but on that date, his enlistment of 5 November 1990 was extended for a period of 61...