Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801297
Original file (9801297.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RE 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

DOCKET NUMBER:  98-01 
COUNSEL: NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

Applicant requests that his uncharacterized discharge be changed 
to a general discharge.  Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. 

The appropriate Air  Force offices evaluated applicant's request 
and  provided  advisory  opinions  to  the  Board  recommending  the 
application be  denied  (Exhibit C) .  The advisory opinions were 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response  (Exhibit D). 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. 

After  careful  consideration  of  applicant's  request  and  the 
available evidence of  record, we  find  insufficient evidence of 
error or injustice to warrant corrective action.  The facts and 
opinions stated in the advisory'opinions appear to be based  on 
the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant. 
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which 
entitled,  appropriate  regulations  were  not  followed,  or 
appropriate  standards  were  not  applied,  we  find  no  basis  to 
disturb the existing record. 
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. 

The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision. 
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and 
will only be  reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant 
evidence  which  was  not  reasonably  available  at  the  time  the 
application was filed. 
Members of  the Board Mr.  Henry C. Saunders, Ms. Ann L. Heidig, 
and Ms. Sophie A. Clark considered this application on 10 Dec 98 
in accordance with  the provisions of Air  Force  Instruction 36- 
2603 and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552. 

Exhibits : 
A.  Applicant's DD Form 149 
B.  Available Master Personnel Records 
C.  Advisory Opinions 
D.  SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions 

8 July 1998 
98-01 297 

MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR 

FROM:  BCMR Medical Consultant 

1535 Command Drive, EE Wing, 3rd Floor 
Andrews AFB MD  20762-7002 

SUBJECT: 

Applicant's entire case file has been reviewed and is forwarded with the following findings, 

conclusions and recom mend at ions. 

REQUESTED ACTION:  The applicant received an entry level separation under the provisions of 

AFI 36-3208 on 20 April 1998 after 20 days in basic training for a condition of chronic abdominal 
pain which existed prior to service. He applies requesting a general (sic) discharge because he 
states he is unable to collect unemployment benefits with his uncharacterized period of service. 

FACTS:  The records indicate the applicant was seen the very first day of BMT with abdominal 
pain which, when investigated, turned out to be something he had had for at least two years prior to 
entering the Air Force.  His enlistment medical history stated "Yes" to the question of ever having 
abdominal problems, but was interpreted to relate to his history of an appendectomy in childhood. 
This condition was found to be clearly disqualifying for enlistment IAW AFI 48-123, paragraph 7.2, 
and he was administratively separated.  There is no evidence of error or irregularity in the process- 
ing of his case which was properly evaluated.  Action and disposition in this case are proper and 
reflect compliance with Air Force directives which implement the law. 

DISCUSSION:  Individuals are considered in an entry level status for the first 6 months of 

service and any separation which occurs during this period of time will receive an "uncharacterized 
entry level separation."  This is precisely what happened in the applicant's case.  There is no doubt 
his condition preexisted his entry on active duty and was, therefore, disqualifying for entry into the 
Air Force.  No other characterization of service is possible under law for service members separated 
within the first 6 months of entry. 

RECOMMENDATION:  The Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the records is 

warranted and the application should be denied. 

FMDERICK 
Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR 
Medical Advisor SAF Personnel Council 

W. HORNICK, coi., USAF, MC, FS 

DEPARTMENT O F  T H E  A I R   F O R C E  

H E A D Q U A R T E R S   AIR  F O R C E  P E R S O N N E L  C E N T E R  

R A N D O L P H  AIR  F O R C E  B A S E  T E X A S  

MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR 

FROM:  HQ AFPCDPPRS 

550 C Street West, Suite 11 
Randolph AFB TX  78 150-47 13 

T:  Application for Correction of Military Records 

The applicant, while serving in the grade of airman basic, was separated from the Air 

Force on 20 Apr 98 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Entry Level Separation-Failed 
MedicaVPhysical Procurement Standards) with an uncharacterized discharge.  He served 20 days 
active service. 

Requested Action.  The applicant is requesting his uncharacterized discharge be changed 

to general discharge. He states the uncharacterized discharge makes him ineligible for 
unemployment.  This advisory will address only the discharge processing in the case. 

Conclusion and Recommendation.  Denial.  Airmen are given entry level 

separatioduncharacterized service characterization when separation action is initiated in the first 
180 days of continuous active service.  Applicant served only 20 days and therefore, the 
uncharacterized discharge is correct and in accordance with Department of Defense and Air Force 
directives.  He has filed a timely request. 

JOHN C. WOOTEN, DAF 
Mil Personnel Mgt Spcl 
Separations Branch 
Dir of Personnel Program Mgt 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE 

WASHINGTON, DC 

MEMORANDUM FOR  SAFBCMR 

. 

FROM:  HQ AFDPRCL 

1040 Air Force Pentagon 
Washington, DC 20330-1040 
p1 

SUBJECT:  Ap  lication for Correction of Military Record 

The attached file is forwarded to you for final action.  Our ofice has primary responsibility 
for establishing Air Force policy on unemployment compensation for ex-servicemembers (UCX). 
We interpret the law and determine which separation narratives fall within the statutory eligibility 
criteria. 

Title 5, United States Code, is the legal basis for Air Force policy.  It establishes basic 
UCX eligibility by providing conditions of separation that would qualifl for unemployment 
compensation. Members who separate without completing their first full term must have 
separated for convenience of the government under an early release program; hardship; medical 
disqualification, service incurred injuqddisability, parenthood or pregnancy; or inaptitude or 
personality disorder.  The Air Force determines which separation narratives would qualify for 
UCX under these criterion. 
for unemployment benefits. 

eparation narrative is not among those that qualify 

separation narrative, as validated by AFPC was “Failed MedicaWhysical 

Procurement Standards.”  As such, the separation narrative is not among those making an ex- 
servicemember eligible for UCX.  We do not have authority to recommend approval or 
disapproval of a request to change a narrative reason for separation.  If the board elects to change 
the member’s separation reason and questions arise concerning the UCX eligibility of the proposed 
new separation narrative, we will-advise the board on the UCX status of the proposed narrative. 

EUGENE J. McGRATH, Major, USAF 
Chief, Special & Incentive Pay Policy 
Directorate of Personnel Resources Division 

695-0060 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801043

    Original file (9801043.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant voluntarily requested early separation from the Air Force by submitting an AF Form 3 1 which indicated her reason for requesting early separation was miscellaneous reason. However, with the applicant’s desire to separate 01 Jan 98 (as indicated in her application), she still would not have been eligible for a separation “to attend school” because her normal expiration term of service (ETS) was 980328, more than 90 days allowed by Air Force Instructions. The Air Force approved...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800061

    Original file (9800061.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The applicant voluntarily requested early separation from the Air Force for miscellaneous reasons and the request was approved for his separation to be effective 06 Aug 97.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9802267

    Original file (9802267.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801881

    Original file (9801881.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . RECOMMENDATION: None; -oes not have the required time on active duty to qualify for educational benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs. The applicant is requesting her DD Form 214 to state that her discharge was for the good of the government.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802338

    Original file (9802338.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed. The applicant is requesting his uncharacterized character of service be changed to honorable.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9802338

    Original file (9802338.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed. The applicant is requesting his uncharacterized character of service be changed to honorable.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801305

    Original file (9801305.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Separations Branch, Directorate of Personnel Program Management, AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed this application and states that they concur with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant's recommendation that the applicant's reason for separation should be changed to "Secretarial Authority" with a SPD of "KFF." The Board notes that the AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends changing the narrative reason for separation on the DD Form 214...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01763

    Original file (BC-2007-01763.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Separations from the Air Force based on those reasons would be detailed on the DD Form 214 as reasons for separation, and for ex-service-members who did not complete their first full term of service, a “Miscellaneous” separation generally would not serve as an exception for qualifying for UCX. Had she realized the importance of the narrative reason for discharge, she would have filed for early separation with her main reason, that being education. In order to provide the relief she seeks,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801331

    Original file (9801331.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    She applies now to change the reason for discharge “from personality disorder” to “adjustment disorder.” FACTS: Early in basic military training the applicant was evaluated by the mental health section of Wilford Hall Medical Center with a resulting diagnosis of “Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood DSM-IV Code 309.0.” Details of the evaluation are missing from the records, but the condition is noted on the letter of notification to the applicant that she was being recommended for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801185

    Original file (9801185.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01185 SEP 2 9 1998 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES Applicant requests that (1) her Calendar Year 1998 (CY981 Lieutenant Colonel, Nurse Corp, Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) be replaced with a new PRF and (2) she be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY98 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. The appropriate Air...