AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RE
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his uncharacterized discharge be changed
to a general discharge. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request
and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C) . The advisory opinions were
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory'opinions appear to be based on
the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Henry C. Saunders, Ms. Ann L. Heidig,
and Ms. Sophie A. Clark considered this application on 10 Dec 98
in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-
2603 and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
Exhibits :
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinions
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions
8 July 1998
98-01 297
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: BCMR Medical Consultant
1535 Command Drive, EE Wing, 3rd Floor
Andrews AFB MD 20762-7002
SUBJECT:
Applicant's entire case file has been reviewed and is forwarded with the following findings,
conclusions and recom mend at ions.
REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant received an entry level separation under the provisions of
AFI 36-3208 on 20 April 1998 after 20 days in basic training for a condition of chronic abdominal
pain which existed prior to service. He applies requesting a general (sic) discharge because he
states he is unable to collect unemployment benefits with his uncharacterized period of service.
FACTS: The records indicate the applicant was seen the very first day of BMT with abdominal
pain which, when investigated, turned out to be something he had had for at least two years prior to
entering the Air Force. His enlistment medical history stated "Yes" to the question of ever having
abdominal problems, but was interpreted to relate to his history of an appendectomy in childhood.
This condition was found to be clearly disqualifying for enlistment IAW AFI 48-123, paragraph 7.2,
and he was administratively separated. There is no evidence of error or irregularity in the process-
ing of his case which was properly evaluated. Action and disposition in this case are proper and
reflect compliance with Air Force directives which implement the law.
DISCUSSION: Individuals are considered in an entry level status for the first 6 months of
service and any separation which occurs during this period of time will receive an "uncharacterized
entry level separation." This is precisely what happened in the applicant's case. There is no doubt
his condition preexisted his entry on active duty and was, therefore, disqualifying for entry into the
Air Force. No other characterization of service is possible under law for service members separated
within the first 6 months of entry.
RECOMMENDATION: The Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the records is
warranted and the application should be denied.
FMDERICK
Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR
Medical Advisor SAF Personnel Council
W. HORNICK, coi., USAF, MC, FS
DEPARTMENT O F T H E A I R F O R C E
H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR F O R C E P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H AIR F O R C E B A S E T E X A S
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPCDPPRS
550 C Street West, Suite 11
Randolph AFB TX 78 150-47 13
T: Application for Correction of Military Records
The applicant, while serving in the grade of airman basic, was separated from the Air
Force on 20 Apr 98 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Entry Level Separation-Failed
MedicaVPhysical Procurement Standards) with an uncharacterized discharge. He served 20 days
active service.
Requested Action. The applicant is requesting his uncharacterized discharge be changed
to general discharge. He states the uncharacterized discharge makes him ineligible for
unemployment. This advisory will address only the discharge processing in the case.
Conclusion and Recommendation. Denial. Airmen are given entry level
separatioduncharacterized service characterization when separation action is initiated in the first
180 days of continuous active service. Applicant served only 20 days and therefore, the
uncharacterized discharge is correct and in accordance with Department of Defense and Air Force
directives. He has filed a timely request.
JOHN C. WOOTEN, DAF
Mil Personnel Mgt Spcl
Separations Branch
Dir of Personnel Program Mgt
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
MEMORANDUM FOR SAFBCMR
.
FROM: HQ AFDPRCL
1040 Air Force Pentagon
Washington, DC 20330-1040
p1
SUBJECT: Ap lication for Correction of Military Record
The attached file is forwarded to you for final action. Our ofice has primary responsibility
for establishing Air Force policy on unemployment compensation for ex-servicemembers (UCX).
We interpret the law and determine which separation narratives fall within the statutory eligibility
criteria.
Title 5, United States Code, is the legal basis for Air Force policy. It establishes basic
UCX eligibility by providing conditions of separation that would qualifl for unemployment
compensation. Members who separate without completing their first full term must have
separated for convenience of the government under an early release program; hardship; medical
disqualification, service incurred injuqddisability, parenthood or pregnancy; or inaptitude or
personality disorder. The Air Force determines which separation narratives would qualify for
UCX under these criterion.
for unemployment benefits.
eparation narrative is not among those that qualify
separation narrative, as validated by AFPC was “Failed MedicaWhysical
Procurement Standards.” As such, the separation narrative is not among those making an ex-
servicemember eligible for UCX. We do not have authority to recommend approval or
disapproval of a request to change a narrative reason for separation. If the board elects to change
the member’s separation reason and questions arise concerning the UCX eligibility of the proposed
new separation narrative, we will-advise the board on the UCX status of the proposed narrative.
EUGENE J. McGRATH, Major, USAF
Chief, Special & Incentive Pay Policy
Directorate of Personnel Resources Division
695-0060
The applicant voluntarily requested early separation from the Air Force by submitting an AF Form 3 1 which indicated her reason for requesting early separation was miscellaneous reason. However, with the applicant’s desire to separate 01 Jan 98 (as indicated in her application), she still would not have been eligible for a separation “to attend school” because her normal expiration term of service (ETS) was 980328, more than 90 days allowed by Air Force Instructions. The Air Force approved...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The applicant voluntarily requested early separation from the Air Force for miscellaneous reasons and the request was approved for his separation to be effective 06 Aug 97.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E A I R F O R C E H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . RECOMMENDATION: None; -oes not have the required time on active duty to qualify for educational benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs. The applicant is requesting her DD Form 214 to state that her discharge was for the good of the government.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed. The applicant is requesting his uncharacterized character of service be changed to honorable.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed. The applicant is requesting his uncharacterized character of service be changed to honorable.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Separations Branch, Directorate of Personnel Program Management, AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed this application and states that they concur with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant's recommendation that the applicant's reason for separation should be changed to "Secretarial Authority" with a SPD of "KFF." The Board notes that the AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends changing the narrative reason for separation on the DD Form 214...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01763
Separations from the Air Force based on those reasons would be detailed on the DD Form 214 as reasons for separation, and for ex-service-members who did not complete their first full term of service, a “Miscellaneous” separation generally would not serve as an exception for qualifying for UCX. Had she realized the importance of the narrative reason for discharge, she would have filed for early separation with her main reason, that being education. In order to provide the relief she seeks,...
She applies now to change the reason for discharge “from personality disorder” to “adjustment disorder.” FACTS: Early in basic military training the applicant was evaluated by the mental health section of Wilford Hall Medical Center with a resulting diagnosis of “Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood DSM-IV Code 309.0.” Details of the evaluation are missing from the records, but the condition is noted on the letter of notification to the applicant that she was being recommended for...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01185 SEP 2 9 1998 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES Applicant requests that (1) her Calendar Year 1998 (CY981 Lieutenant Colonel, Nurse Corp, Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) be replaced with a new PRF and (2) she be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY98 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. The appropriate Air...