AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1 4 1998
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01330
COUNSEL :
HEARING DESIRED: NO
~
Applicant requests his 23 March 1960 general discharge be upgraded
to honorable. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
Applicant's military personnel records were destroyed by fire in
1973. Therefore, the facts surrounding his separation from the Air
Force cannot be verified.
Documentation provided by the applicant indicates that he appeared
before the Air Force Discharge Review Board on 22 May 1967, and his
undesirable discharge was upgraded to general (under honorable
conditions) .
His report of separation reflects that he was
discharged under the provisions of AFM 39-12, Chapter 2, Section B,
for unfitness.
After careful consideration of applicant's request, we found
insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. Based upon the
presumption of regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs
and without evidence to the contrary, we must assume that the
applicant's discharge was proper and in compliance with appropriate
directives. Therefore, we find no basis upon which to favorably
consider this application.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board, Messrs. Douglas J. Heady, Joseph G. Diamond,
and Henry Romo Jr., considered this application on 11 August 1998,
in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-2603
and the governing
statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
Exhibit:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
DOUGLAS J. HE&
Panel Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02273 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Applicant has provided, through his Senator’s office, documentation regarding his post service activities. We also find insufficient...
8 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 5 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01442 COUNSEL: NONE AUG 2 4 W8 HEARING DESIRED: NO c I. b )P honorable. On 1 Mar 94, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant's request that his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. E. Applicant's Response SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The applicant voluntarily requested early separation from the Air Force for miscellaneous reasons and the request was approved for his separation to be effective 06 Aug 97.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03512 INDEX CODE: A61.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. In support of his appeal, the applicant provided several post-service letters. Exhibit B.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
A complete copy of the Report of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E. In a letter dated 22 August 1998, applicant stated the following: “On my DD214 it states the reason for my discharge was due to a Court Martial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02423 INDEX CODE: 110 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING: NO The applicant requests that his general under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. Applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit F. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. ...