NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06626-02
Although the date of discharge is not shown in available records, Petitioner indicates she was discharged on 30 April 2000. e. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Director, He pointed out that there is a VA Naval Council of Personnel Boards (NCPB) advised the Board, in effect, that the PEB made its findings on 5 January 2000, which was approximately nine months after the 9 April 1999 TDRL examination, rather than one year as claimed by Petitioner. That Petitioner's naval record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06629-00
Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 7000 Ser of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06629-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that naval record be corrected to show, in effect, that he was discharged for medical reasons, vice fraudulent enlistment. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Mcculloch and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 January 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06636-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06639-01
Copies of these replies are forwarded as Enclosure (3) is a copy of a letter forwarded 1993 regarding his entitlement to (1) and (2) _ During the period he served in the Marine Corps, the Purple Heart 2. was authorized for award to those who were wounded or injured as a direct result of action by an enemy of the United States or an opposing armed force of a foreign country in which the Armed Forces of the United States was engaged. and enlisted Marines who were assigned to his former unit...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06639-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner earned Pass Not Advanced 2001 Exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Harrison, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06642-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06645-01
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BO ARD FOR CORRE CT ION OF N AV AL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TJR Docket No: 6645-0 1 13 May 200 2 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. sitting in executive session, considered your A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, application on 7 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06649-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 6649-02 16 October 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) premiums...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06651-01
considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Heart was authorized for award to those who were wounded or injured as a direct result of action by an enemy of the United States or an opposing armed force of a foreign country in which the Armed Forces of the United...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06656-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2003. In the absence of evidence which shows that you were physically qualified for further service at that time, and that your discharge by reason of physical disability was therefore erroneous, there is no basis for changing your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06662-01
considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Awards Branch, Headquarters Marine Corps dated 12 February 2002, a copy of which is attached. VIRGINIA 22 134-S 10 3 IN REPLY REFER TO: 165 0 MMMA3 12 Feb 02 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS SUBJ: EST FOR ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF FORMER MARINE During the period 1. Headquarters fails to reveal any documentation to substantiate his entitlement to the Purple Heart award.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06662-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Minimum average marks of 3.0 in conduct and 2.8 in overall traits were required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of your separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06668-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. Gilbert, McCormick, and Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. and especially in light...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06669-01
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser 31 of 7 November 2001 (3) Subject ’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to void the discharge issued on 21 January 2000. The Board, consisting of Mr. Brezna, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 5...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06671-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION CASE OF SEAMAN
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06673-01
1552 (b) BUPERSINST 1900.8 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting a change in the RE-4 reenlistment code issued to her on 14 January 1997. Since her performance of The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06674-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 2 October 2002 6674-01 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06676-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Headquarters Marine Corps In this connection, the Board substantially Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. VIRGINIA 221 34-51...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06678-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2003. The member alleges the report is unjust because his input was not documented in the report and some opinions are not supported by facts. c. Reference (a), Annex S, paragraph S-3 states, "A member has the right to submit fitness or evaluation report input, and has the duty to do so if requested by the rater or reporting senior".
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06681-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370.5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 668 l-02 22 August 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. Gilbert,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06683-01
1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments Series of Documents Subject’s naval record I. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the reenlistment executed on or about 5 April 2001 is for a term of 2 years, vice 4 years. The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed 2002 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06689-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 HD:hd Docket No: 06689-02 4 November 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : LCD REV Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. He was not considered, as he was not commissioned as an SC officer until after this promotion board had convened. (4), NPC Code Pers-8023, having reviewed the ’s failure of g. The memorandum for the record at enclosure (5)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06696-02
Although the enlisted performance board initially recommended discharge, this decision was changed after you submitted evidence that you had met the weight standards. The fitness report for the period 13 September 1986 to 14 February 1987 states as follows:(He) is leaving the Marine Corps after nineteen years of dedicated service, including an extended tour in the Republic of Vietnam. Consequently, the Board concluded that a correction to your record to show that you retired from the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06699-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. When informed of the recommendation, you elected to waive your right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06702-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the (BCNR) 3. use by the Board for correction...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06707-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change a 12 month extension agreement to 4 months. The Board, consisting of Mr. Brezna, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 5 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06715-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. upon a majority vote of the board members, his record was not competitive with the records of the Marines selected for promotion.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06717-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 6312. The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 13 November 2002 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06718-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. was granted and, as a result of this action, you were spared the stigma of a court-martial conviction and the potential penalties of a punitive discharge and confinement at hard labor. not sufficient to warrant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06721-00
t for the period 960914 to 970710 (TR) was Removal of Reference (b) is the performance evaluation directive requested. evidenced in the final paragraph of enclosure (6) to reference REPORTING SENIORS HERE WILL BE (a) (i.e., "FITNESS REPORTS. THE FITNESS REPORTS.").
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06722-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. estab-lish the existence of probable material The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 15 September 1989. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06730-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enclosure (1) shows member served four years of active enlisted service from 1 June 1993 to 31 May 1997, Reserves until he joined the Air Force Reserves on 17 August 1998. a nator: Date of Report: 10/24/01 33 Statement of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06732-00
118(11)"e", page 11 entry plication and Sergeant P1070.12J, Marine Corps Individual Records Administration (IRAM), authorizes commanders to make entries on page 11 One of the many leadership tools that a commander has at Marine Corps policy is that reasonable efforts at MC0 2. equest for removal 118(11)"e" page 11 b. Disapprove Staff Sergeant equest that the statement dated (2), be This document does not meet the guidelines 4010.2e of the IRAM and paragraph 6106 of 17Jun00,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06732-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures Board. a fourth nonjudicial punishment for disobedience of a lawful order, absence from your appointed place of duty, and losing your identification card. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06736-01
When you did not enlist as you agreed, The record shows that you voluntarily enlisted in It is clear from the regulations that your discharge from the USAFR was required when you enlisted in the Naval Reserve. The Board noted the comments made by AFBCMR to the effect that the Navy attempted to resolve your status by sending information concerning your active duty to the address you provided. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06737-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 (2) Subject ’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, show that he was assigned a reenlistment code more favorable than the RE-4 code he received on 15 March 2001. in effect, that his naval record be corrected to b. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Harrison, Shy and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner 3 allegations of error and injustice on 25 April 2002 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06743-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06744-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8 11 of 7 December 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06748-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 6748-02 16 October 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy rw~~+:&~~’ ~-~~~~~.~ Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he declined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06749-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06753-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. Gilbert, McCormick, and Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06758-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 1 November 2001, a copy of which is attached. It was amended and d. A member who was eligible for retired pay under United States Code, Chapter 1223, on 30 September or who received by 30 June Title 10, 1978, but who was under age 60, 1979, a notification of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06759-01
require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an enlistment is voided or if an individual is separated by reason of erroneous enlistment due to alcohol abuse. Concerning Petitioner's request for a change in his reenlistment code, an RE-4 reenlistment code is appropriate in Petitioner's case since he was separated prior to completing recruit training by reason of erroneous enlistment due to alcohol dependency. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he received...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06760-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TJR Docket No: 6760-02 23 April 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. At the time of his discharge Petitioner’s conduct average of 4.0 was sufficiently higher than the average mark of 3.25 normally required for a fully honorable characterization of service. Based on the foregoing, the Board concludes...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06764-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1 ’133 Ser attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06770-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06771-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 June 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Although it is possible that you would have been prescribed vitamin B-6 had you disclosed your history of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06772-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 6 February 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 1 April 1983 the discharge authority directed discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. that the foregoing factors and contentions were insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06773-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. entry level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...