DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ’ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 6732-02
28 August 2003
Your allegations of error and
appl-icable to the proceedings of this
X
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 27 August 2003.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
.,and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 26 April
1979.
The
punishments and were convicted by a summary court-martial.
offenses included an unauthorized absence
from your appointed place of duty, dereliction of duty, breaking
restriction, and disobedience of a lawful order.
A special court-martial convened on 21 January 1981 and found you
guilty of stealing a stereo, robbery of $15, and unlawfully
entering a barracks storeroom with the intent to wrongfully
appropriate.
The court sentenced you to confinement at hard
labor for five months, forfeitures of $334 per month for five
months, and a bad conduct discharge.
a fourth nonjudicial punishment for disobedience of a lawful
order, absence from your appointed place of duty, and losing your
identification card.
17 September 1982.
The record reflects that you received three nonjudicial
of,two days, absence
You received the bad conduct discharge on
Subsequently, you received
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
Accordingly, your
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
immaturity.
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
due to the seriousness of the offenses.
The names and votes of the members
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02092-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2003. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to your extensive disciplinary record which included Accordingly, your unauthorized absences totalling 13 months. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10888-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03716-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, desire to upgrade your discharge, and the passage of time. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09507-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 6 February 1975 at age 17. However, your request was denied and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09080-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2008. In this regard, there is no evidence that you previously received a general discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02884-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. duty for 14 days. However, this request was denied and on 9 May 1979, after the BCD was approved at all levels of review, you were so discharged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05252-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02379-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. January 1981 you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06434-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were discharged on 11 June 1976.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06039-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. convicted by SPCM of the four specifications of disobedience and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 75 days, a $744 forfeiture of pay, reduction to discharge (BCD). 1978 you were convicted by SPCM of two periods...