DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 6642-00
6 April 2001
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 April 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
of this
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
A
psychiatr,ic evaluation, conducted on 7 July 1987,
passive-
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 29 June 1987 at
age 19.
revealed that you had an adjustment disorder and a
aggressive personality disorder.
officer directed your separation based on your failure to adapt
to the Navy due to your adjustment problems.
received an entry level separation by reason of entry level
At that time you were assigned a
conduct and performance.
reenlistment code of RE-4.
On 10 July 1987 the commanding
On 17 July 1987 you
An RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance
and normally assigned to individuals who fail to complete recruit
training.
injustice in your reenlistment code.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board thus concluded that there is no error or
The names and votes of the members
Accordingly, your
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08385-00
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were so separated on 17 June At that time you were not recommended for reenlistment and Subsequently, the separation t:Lme you stated "I do not At that You desire a change in the reenlistment code so that you can again serve in the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a cor:cection of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01476-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You On 24 January 2001 your commanding officer forwarded the separation action, to the discharge authority. supported the RE-4 reenlistment code due to your failure to adapt to the Marine Corps.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03990-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board found no evidence that the diagnosis of adjustment disorder was incorrect. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01908-01
1908-01 19 July 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. contend that you became worried while in recruit training that you would not be able to pay your bills after you learned...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04718-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 1 July 1987 at the age of 19 and served for nearly five years without...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00941-10
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice: You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on 25 July 2001. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change to your RE-4 reenlistment code given your NUP and diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01863-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were so discharged on 15 May 2000 and assigned and waived the right to Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment. Since you have been treated no differently than others discharged under similar...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07126-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 April 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00601-03
If your le A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Nava Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2003. approved your separation and on that same day, you were discharged with an entry-level separation by reason of e enlistment due to the diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07178-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Therefore, given your pre-service suicidal ideation and threat to kill yourself while at recruit training, and since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. ...