DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 6773-02
3 September 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 28 August 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 29 February
1984.
atopic dermatitis.
entry level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment.
On 22 March 1984 a medical board diagnosed you as having
Subsequently, on 5 April 1984 you received an
such as your youth and
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
immaturity.
not sufficient to warrant an honorable discharge.
separation is routinely assigned to individuals separated within
the first 180 days of active duty.
Therefore, the entry level
separation was appropriate since you served only 37 days of
active duty.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
An entry level
The
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
can‘not be taken.
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07849-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 3 February 1984 you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of entry level performance and conduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03798-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and Board. months of service in the Air Force from August 1974 until February 1976 and more than two years of service in the Army National Guard from December 1981 until February 1984. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is' on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02585-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 WMP Docket No: 19 August 2002 2585-02 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. considered your A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 14 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06798-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7412-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2014. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03374-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your prior honorable service and post service conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01439-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06179-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. received NJP for failure to go to your appointed place of duty, and assault. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08314-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04835-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The The On 18 September 1984 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of the serious nature of your repetitive drug use,...