Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06764-02
Original file (06764-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 6764-02
13 November 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section  1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered  your application on 13 November 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1 ’133 Ser  
attached.

33/undated, a copy of which is

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained

 

in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to 

keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND

MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE

5722 INTEGRITY DR.
 
38054-5057

IN REPLY REFER TO:

1133
Ser 

33/

From:
To:

Commander,
Executive Director,

Navy Recruiting Command

Board for Correction of Naval Records

Subj:

BCNR REQUEST ICO

Ref:

(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST  

1130.8F

Encl:

(1) BCNR Docket Nr.   06764-02

Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).

1.
individuals who complete
of college credits may be enlisted/reenlisted in
The applicant has   50.30  clock hours, which do not convert to
semester/quarter hours,and does not qualify for

  45  semester hours, or

  E-3.

Per reference (a),

  67 quarter   hours ,

 

paygrade  E-3 ’.

This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for

3
Y.
Correction of Naval Records only.

Enclosure (1) is returned.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03844-01

    Original file (03844-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum which is attached. S. equivalent of 20 semester paygrade E-2. Per enclosure (l), applicant took Per reference (a), This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05383-09

    Original file (05383-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01488-03

    Original file (01488-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on 28 October 2003. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06813-01

    Original file (06813-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05291-02

    Original file (05291-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02861-01

    Original file (02861-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04180-00

    Original file (04180-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. completed six semester hours of college.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02154-01

    Original file (02154-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01436-01

    Original file (01436-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00115-01

    Original file (00115-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.