Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06683-01
Original file (06683-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 6683-01
8 January 2002

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Ref: (a)

Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl:

(1)
(2)
(3)

DD Form 149 w/attachments
Series of Documents
Subject’s naval record

I.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show that the reenlistment executed on or about 5 April 2001 is for a term of 2
years, vice 4 years.

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed
2002 and, pursuant to its
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 January
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

 

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice, finds as follows:

’s allegations

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

showing that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.

In correspondence attached as enclosure  

(2), Petitioner submitted documentation

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
contents of enclosure  
following corrective action.

(2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the

Docket No: 6683-01

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

a. The reenlistment executed on or about 4 April 2001 is for a term of 2 years, vice 4

years. Member reenlisted under the provisions of the PRISE III program.

b. He was discharged on 21 October 2001 and reenlisted on 22 October 2001

(graduation from  “A” school). The term is 6 years.

C. The above changes will entitle member to a zone  “A” SRB, award level 5.0, for the

FC rating.

d. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner

’s naval record.

4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

-W-

GL
G. L. ADAMS
Acting Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures

5.
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with  
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

,its provisions, it is hereby announced that the

8 January 

2002

Executive Direct



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08222-01

    Original file (08222-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Cooper, Mr. Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06749-01

    Original file (06749-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment. 2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05687-01

    Original file (05687-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the SH rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06821-01

    Original file (06821-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone GSM rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06975-01

    Original file (06975-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05968-01

    Original file (05968-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 5968-01 8 January 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to Bonus (SRB) for NEC...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08001-01

    Original file (08001-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD ANNEX NAVY 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy S MEH : ddj Docket No: 8001-01 20 February 2002 Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone MM rating. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07947-01

    Original file (07947-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone 5326. The Board, consisting of Mr. Cooper, Mr. Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07062-01

    Original file (07062-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone IT rating (NEC 2735). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06963-01

    Original file (06963-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for the PR rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Cooper, Mr. Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...