Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06759-01
Original file (06759-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

CRS
Docket No: 6759-01
16 January 2002

From:
To:
Subj:

Ref:
Encl:

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

ORD 0

(a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3), Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve, filed enclosure (1)
with this Board requesting, in effect, that his reenlistment code
be changed.
2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Hare, Mr. 
Novello, and Mr.
McPartlin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 15 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record.
Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Although it appears that enclosure (1) was not filed in
timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to waive the
statute of limitations and review the application on its merits.
C . Petitioner enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 20 April 1994.

He reported to active duty on 11 August 1994.
1994 he was diagnosed as being alcohol dependent.

On 10 November

d. On 17 November 1994 he received nonjudicial punishment for

an unauthorized absence of 12 days.

e. On 29 November 1994 the commanding officer directed a void

enlistment by reason of erroneous enlistment due to alcohol

abuse.
time he was assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.

Petitioner was separated on 2 December 1994.

At that

However, even if

an individual so diagnosed may be

f. Title 10 U.S.C. 978 states that an enlistment may be voided
only if an individual is diagnosed as drug or alcohol dependent
within 72 hours of reporting to active duty.
this time limit is not met,
separated with an entry level separation by reason of erroneous
Additionally, regulations
enlistment due to alcohol abuse.
require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an
enlistment is voided or if an individual is separated by reason
of erroneous enlistment due to alcohol abuse.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants partial
In this regard, it is clear that Petitioner was not
relief.
diagnosed as alcohol dependent within 72 hours of his entry on
active duty.
Therefore, the Board concludes that the record
should be corrected wherever necessary to show that he was
separated with an entry level separation.
Concerning Petitioner's request for a change in his reenlistment
code, an RE-4 reenlistment code is appropriate in Petitioner's
case since he was separated prior to completing recruit training
by reason of erroneous enlistment due to alcohol dependency.
Such a code is required under these circumstances.
In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an
injustice warranting the following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he

received an entry level separation on 2 December 1994 vice the
void enlistment now of record.

b. That Petitioner's request for a change in the reenlistment

code be denied.

c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

d. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's
together with this Report

naval record be returned to the Board,
of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file maintained
for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of
Petitioner's naval record.

2

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
and that the foregoing is a true and
review and deliberations,
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

17

Acting Recorder

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
has been approved by the Board on
authority of reference (a),
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Executive 

Di



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02764-01

    Original file (02764-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 CRS Docket No: 2764-01 15 January 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Subj: Secretary of the Navy OF2 ECORD .-, (a) 10 U.S.C. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants partial In this regard it is clear that Petitioner was not relief. That any material or entries inconsistent...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06707-97

    Original file (06707-97.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 12 January 1996. Such a code is required under these An RE-4 reenlistment code is Absent a Accordingly, In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. That Petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08432-01

    Original file (08432-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. Petitioner was then advised that administrative separation action was being initiated by reasons of erroneous enlistment as evidenced by the diagnosis of alcohol dependence. Additionally, the applicable regulation requires the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of "erroneous entry-alcohol abuse. " That Petitioner's naval record be corrected'by issuing him a new DD Form 214 which reflects that he served on active duty from 8 February to 8 March...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05561-06

    Original file (05561-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs.reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the availabl& evidence of record. On 20 February 1999 Petitioner was issued a void enlistment due to alcohol dependence and was assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.e. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that he was separated on 20 February 1999 with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05187-01

    Original file (05187-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, Board requesting, in effect, by changing the reenlistment code assigned on 29 June 1993. that his naval record be corrected filed enclosure (1) with this 2. the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9805169

    Original file (NC9805169.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ivins, Rothlein, and Taylor, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 July 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Therefore, the Board concludes that the record should be corrected to show that he was discharged with an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment. That Petitioner's naval record be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02684-01

    Original file (02684-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2684-01 21 August 2001 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that the reason for discharge and his reenlistment code be changed. Thereafter, the discharge authority directed that Petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04247-06

    Original file (04247-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100TJR Docket No: 4247-06 16 January 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his discharge be upgraded and his reenlistment code and narrative reason for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05747-06

    Original file (05747-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 2O37O-5100TJRDocket No: 5747-06 26 February 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs.reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03047-01

    Original file (03047-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Schnittman, Mr. Mazza, and Mr. Novello, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. within that time frame, Petitioner should have been processed for an entry...